Cases

398 F.3d 1322 Elizabeth A. PRICE, Petitioner,v.SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 04-3062. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 17, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Michael J. Kator, Kator, Parks & Weiser, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Kelly

401 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2005) Anthony S. BLANKS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 05-G-0212-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. November 14, 2005. *1224 Darryl W. Hunt, Clark & James LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Lane H. Woodke, U.

Reversed and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge KEENAN joined. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Constance L. Patterson (“Patterson”) appeals from a district-court order affirming the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) decision to deny her application for disability

734 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Corliss Larsen BAUER, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil No. 08-6088 (RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 24, 2010. *776 Corliss Larsen Bauer, Lino Lakes, MN, pro se. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendan

MEMORANDUM *** Marilyn Howell appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The panel’s review is “essentially the same as that undertaken by the district court.” Stone v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 530, 532 (9th Cir.1985

MEMORANDUM *** Marilyn Howell appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The panel’s review is “essentially the same as that undertaken by the district court.” Stone v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 530, 532 (9th Cir.1985

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1394 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1394 DAWN M. DRUMGOLD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant –

535 F.Supp.2d 604 (2008) Jerry L. SHINABERRY, Plaintiff; v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:07CV28. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. March 7, 2008. *605 Judith C. Walz, Lewisburg, WV, for Plaintiff. Helen Campbell. Altmeyer, U.S. Attorney's Office, Wheeling, WV

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR PATRICK BLANKS, et al., ) No. ED97810 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER William H. Baughman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge Introduction Before me1 is an action by Denise Renee Sito under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits.2 The Commissioner has

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Michele Laverne Brooks brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for Social Security Disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. “Our Tigger.” That is what Austin Manning’s parents called him when he was a little boy, because he bounced around like Tigger from the classic tale, Winnie the Pooh. He never sat still for more than a second. At the time, the family thought it was cute. Little did they know of the problems to come.

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff appeals from a denial of disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). The action is one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *615§ 405(g) to review the filial determination of the Commissioner. On September 9, 2011, plaintiff fi

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Heartfield, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits. The court heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Paulette Griffin seeks review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final determination denying her concurrent applications for disability insurance benefits and disabled widow’s benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423, as well as supplemental security income under Title XVI, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. Griffin’s applications were denied at all

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (docket no. U), GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 9), DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 12) AND REMANDING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying Plaintiff Dav

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Paulette Griffin seeks review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final determination denying her concurrent applications for disability insurance benefits and disabled widow’s benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423, as well as supplemental security income under Title XVI, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. Griffin’s applications were denied at all

OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge: Claimant John P. Bergstad seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner 1 of the Social Security Administration denying him disability insurance benefits (SSD) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. This court has jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g

614 F.3d 611 (2010) William FERRIELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-5597. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 20, 2010. *612 ON BRIEF: Julie Atkins, Atkins Law Office, Harlan, Kentucky, for Appellant. J. Patrick Powers, Mary Ann Sloan, Dennis R. Williams, Dougl

728 F.Supp.2d 297 (2010) Ernesto RIVERA, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Respondent. No. 06 Civ. 1354(RJS)(HBP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 21, 2010. *303 William Peairs Gottlieb, Axelrod and Gottlieb, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher, United States Attorney's Of