Cases

OPINION DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL E. WILES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is a motion to dismiss (the “Motion to. Dismiss”) filed by BP 399 Park Avenue LLC (the “Landlord”) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding brought by Blue Dog at 399 Inc. (the “Debtor”). Among other things, the Landlord takes the position that this Court is precluded from considering the claims

OPINION Opinion by Justice Garza This case involves personal injuries allegedly caused by a contract working dog (“CWD”) on a United States military base in Afghanistan. Appellant LaTasha Freeman argues that the trial court erred in granting a plea to the jurisdiction dismissing her suit against appellees, American K-9 Detection Serv

OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. This appeal is the latest chapter in an ongoing dispute between Ingrid Anderson *346 and the City of Blue Ash, Ohio, over whether Anderson can keep a miniature horse at her house as a service animal for her disabled minor daughter, C.A. C.A. suffer

ACCEPTED 13-14-00726-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 6/4/2015 3:59:2

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Curt O. Hall, Plaintiff, v. UBS Financial Services Inc. and Mary Lucy Reid, Defendants. Appellate Case No. 2020-001195 CERTIFIED QUESTION ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Timothy M. Cain, United States District Judge

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents a challenge to J.S.’s suspension from Blue Mountain Middle School after she created from her home computer a MySpace.com Internet profile featuring her principal, James McGonigle. The profile did not state McGonigle’s name, but included his photograph from the website of Blue Mountain School District (the “School District”), as well as profani

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 8 Docket: Cum-21-117 Argued: October 6, 2021 Decided: January 27, 2022 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. PATRICIA SARCHI, et al. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. HORTON, J. [¶1] Uber Tech

OPINION SCIRICA, Circuit Judge The National Labor Relations Board certified a collective-bargaining unit comprised of FedEx Freight, Inc. drivers at FedEx’s South Brunswick Terminal in Monmouth Junction, New Jersey. To test the appropriateness of the unit, FedEx refused to bargain with the unit’s certified bargaining representative, Local 701, contending the terminal’s dockworkers must aiso be included in

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Players Place II Condominium Association, Inc. v. K.P. (A-60/61-22) (088139) Argued November 6, 2023 -- Decided March 13, 2024 RABNER, C.J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court consi

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs bring this putative class action alleging that they have been discriminatorily denied benefits under their employer-offered prescription drug benefit plans. The complaint names two sets of defendants: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC., and Caremark California Specialty Pharmacy, LLC (collectively "CVS"), and Amtrak, Lowe's Companies, and Time Warner, Inc. (collectively "Employ

ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Smartling, Inc. ("Smartling") and Defendant Skawa Innovation Ltd. ("Skawa") are both translation technology companies that provide language translation services for mobile and internet-based clients.1 On November 4, 2015, Smartling filed its First Amended Complaint asserting six causes of action against Skawa for alleged acts of trademark and trade dres

ORDER ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Freight Bulk Pte Ltd’s (“FBP”) Appeal to *756District Court of Memorandum Opinion and Order of Magistrate Judge Leonard. ECF No. 404. Because Judge Leonard’s ruling survives both de novo and clearly erroneous or contrary to law review, the Court

372 F.Supp.2d 248 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 32 MEDLEY LANE, BRANFORD, CONNECTICUT, With all Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon, Defendant. [Claimants: Harold E. VON HOFE and Kathleen M. Von Hofe] No. 3:01CV2290MRK. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 31, 2005.

OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This is a post-trial decision on liability in a timber-sale case.1 The relevant timber-sale contracts pertained to the “Jigsaw,” ‘White-bird,” and “Pigout” timber areas located in the Umpqua National Forest in Southern Oregon, within Region 6 of the National Forest System. Stip. ¶ l.2 On June 30, 2005,

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-18-2005 Interfaith Comm Orgn v. Honeywell Intl Precede

*1159ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on January 6, 2012 by Defendant United-Health Group Incorporated [“Defendant” or “United Health”]. A response was filed on March 13, 2012, and a reply was file

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TROUTMAN, District Judge. The federal labor policy favoring arbitration as the mode which the parties to a collective bargaining agreement have selected to resolve disputes renders “narrow in the extreme” the permissible scope of judicial review of an arbitration award,1 which will be sustained as long as it “draws its essence” from the collective bargaining agr

526 F.Supp.2d 746 (2007) Filiberto Robles ALVARADO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHIPLEY DONUT FLOUR & SUPPLY CO., INC., d/b/a Shipley Do-Nuts, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-06-2113. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 30, 2007. *747 *748

463 F.Supp.2d 583 (2006) Elmira PRESTON, et al. v. TENET HEALTHSYSTEM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 06-3179. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. November 21, 2006. *584 *585 Christopher James Bruno, David Scott Scalia, Joseph M. Bruno, Bruno & Bruno, Gera

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MOUNTAIN WEST SERIES OF LOCKTON ) COMPANIES, LLC (formerly known as DENVER ) SERIES OF LOCKTON COMPANIES, LLC) and ) LOCKTON PARTNERS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0226-JTL