Cases

767 F.Supp.2d 575 (2009) Raven RAY, Plaintiff, v. Robin L. BOWERS, in his individual Capacity, and the College of Charleston, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-3512-PMD. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. November 23, 2009. *576 Charles L. Henshaw, Jr., Furr, Henshaw and Ohanesian, Columbia,

474 S.E.2d 658 (1996) 222 Ga. App. 550 BOB v. HARDY et al. HARDY et al. v. BOB. Nos. A96A0980, A96A0981. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 8, 1996. Reconsideration Denied August 20, 1996. Certiorari Denied November 22, 1996. *660 Barham & Dover, J. Carol

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II. through XI. OPINION Ramon Alfonso Zanoletti (Alfonso) and his wife Magdalena Rosalis Zanoletti (Magdalena) appeal from the judgments entered upon their convictions by jury of insurance fraud. Specifically, Alfonso was convicted of 19 counts of felony ins

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II. through XI. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 5

05/27/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 21, 2021 Session NELSON E. BOWERS, II v. ESTATE OF KATHERINE N. MOUNGER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Roane County No. 13-CV-76 Michael S. Pemberton, Judge No. E2020-01011-COA-R3-CV Thi

OPINION INTRODUCTION After conducting a preliminary hearing, the magistrate held defendants Burl and Judy Looney to answer on, inter alia, four counts of forgery based upon their actions in inducing Joseph Wickers, who was mentally infirm, to execute several testamentary-related documents. (Pen. Code, § 470, *Page 244 subd. (c).)

ACCEPTED 03-15-00096-CR 4624542 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/24/2015 3:32:14 PM

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

OPINION AND ORDER CLYDE H. HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge, J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ second motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and permanent injunction. In their first motion for TRO, filed June 11, 2012, Plaintiffs sought either to have their names restored to the ballot

OPINION & ORDER SWEET, District Judge. Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2012, 41 actions stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public *528offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Face-book” or the “Company”) are presently before this

BLACK, Circuit Judge: This case involves claims of race discrimination at the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library System (AFPLS) brought by Ap-pellees, seven Caucasian female librarians, against Appellants, members of the AFPLS Board of Trustees and the Director of the AFPLS. Appellees (the Librarians) claim Appellants transferred them from their jobs at Central Library to dead-end jo

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. In a span of less than two months, Plaintiff Paul Renfro Harbison, Jr., a pro se litigant, filed three complaints in this Court against dozens of federal and state officials, government agencies, members of the Judiciary, law firms, and private citizens. One complaint has already been r

OPINION & ORDER SWEET, District Judge. Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2012, 41 actions stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Face-book” or the “Company”) are presently before this Court. The instant motion relates to Plai

969 F.2d 1572 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Izeal RIDEAU, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-4172. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 14, 1992. Donald E. Sample, Beaumont, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant. Paul Naman, Kerry M. Klintwort

515 S.E.2d 909 (1999) Earl Ray CAMP, and wife Joyce Dianne Camp, Plaintiffs, v. Mitchell H. LEONARD, and wife, Kimberly B. Leonard, d/b/a Mitch Leonard Construction, and Industrial Federal Savings Bank, Defendants. No. COA98-588. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 15, 1999. *910 W.L. Stafford, Jr., Salisbury, for plaintiff-

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [filed 11/25/13; Docket No. 15] JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge. On November 25, 2013, Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“Toyota”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“Motion”). On December 9, 2013, Plaintiffs Tae Hee Lee (“Lee”) and Alan Quan (“Q

COZORT, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from judgment denying recovery in quantum meruit. Plaintiff (a telephone utility) located its underground cable lines for defendant (a water utility), after normal business hours, over a period of approximately fourteen months. Defendant then refused to pay for the after-hours cable locations, claiming it was under no obligation to make such payment pursuant to the Underground Damage P

SIMEONE, Presiding Judge. This cause involves the construction of the recently enacted dissolution of marriage law adopted by the general assembly, §§ 452.300-452.415, RSMo Supp.1973, and specifically involves the interpretation of the term “marital property” as used in that act. While the facts are rather simple, the legal issues are complex and are not easily resolved. This is an appeal by the appellant

248 P.3d 614 (2011) 2011 WY 25 Terry CASH; Richard J. Maturi; Craig McCune and Rhonda McCune; and Rich Nelson and Rebecca Hilliker, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. GRANITE SPRINGS RETREAT ASSOCIATION, INC., a Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation; Lynn Williams-Haas; Ted and Emma Esquibel; J.T. and Aimee Walsh; John and Sylvia Passehl; Marty and Gail Gill; Cheryl and Doug Brown; Jacque Cash; Mary Maturi; Craig Folsom and April Walton;

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this toxic tort case, Plaintiffs, a number of refinery workers and their wives, allege that they were exposed to excessive amounts of benzene due to the intentional and negligent actions of Defendants and that this exposure caused numerous health problems. The district court excluded the testimony of Plaintiffs’ expert witness that was proffere