Cases

ACCEPTED 15-24-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/17/2025 3:56 PM No. 15-24-00101-CV CHRISTOPHE

ACCEPTED 15-24-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/4/2025 10:42 AM No. 15-24-00101-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-24-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/7/2025 4:53 PM No. 15-24-00101-

ACCEPTED 15-24-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/24/2025 2:10 PM No. 15-24-00101-CV

July 3, 2025 JUDGMENT The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00101-CV MIKE MORATH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, Appellant V. PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH INDEPENDENT SCHO

MANDATE The Fifteenth Court of Appeals THE STATE OF TEXAS TO THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: On July 3, 2025, the Court of Appeals for the Fifteenth District of Texas considered the appeal in the following case: Mike Morath, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Education v. Pecos-Barstow-Toyah Independent School District, et al.3 Court of Appeals No. 15-24-00101-CV Tri

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion and Concurring and Dissenting Opinion filed July 3, 2025 In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00101-CV MIKE MORATH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, Appellant V. PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ATHENS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, BEEVILLE

Reversed and Rendered and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed July 3, 2025. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00101-CV MIKE MORATH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, Appellant V. PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ATHENS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, BEEVILLE

August 13, 2025 JUDGMENT The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00109-CV BRANDON HODGES, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF DISTRICT FOR MIDLAND ISD; DR. MARY BONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A TRUSTEE OF ROUND ROCK ISD; AND

ACCEPTED 15-24-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS January 22, 2025 AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/22/2025 10:05 PM ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQ

THIS was an action of assumpsit on an account for $258.85 with interest from the 1st day of January 1862. In the year 1861 the defendants, W. A. Thatcher, were engaged in building a gunboat in the City of Wilmington under a contract with the Government of the United States, and *Page 33 through an agent in that city, purchased of the plaintiff, Edwin M. Barstow, who was engaged in the ship-chandler business in the City of New York, the bill of goods in q

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-4077.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-296 (C.P.C. No. 18CR-2499) v. :

115 Cal.Rptr.2d 503 (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 346 Paula WRIGHT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BEVERLY FABRICS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. F035445. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. January 17, 2002. Rehearing Denied February 4, 2002. Review Denied May 1, 2002.[*] *50

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Deandre J. Gre-goire appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from his vehicle during a traffic stop. See United, States v. Gregoire, No. 2:02 CR 756 DB, 2003 WL 23355738, Memo. Op. & Order (D.Utah Dec. 2, 2003). Mr. Gregoire pleaded guilty to possession with intent to dis

187 P.3d 679 (2008) 2008-NMCA-066 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William DEMONGEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,453. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. February 29, 2008. Certiorari Granted March 16, 2008. *681 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Katherine Zinn, Assistant Attorney Gen

114 Cal.Rptr.2d 482 (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1216 36 P.3d 21 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Bau A. MOOC, Defendant and Appellant. No. S090666. Supreme Court of California. December 24, 2001. As Modified January 29, 2002. *485 Jeffrey Wilens, Mission Viejo, under

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: A Latin cross sits atop a prominent rock outcropping known as “Sunrise Rock” in the Mojave National Preserve (“Preserve”). Our court previously held that the presence of the cross in the Preserve — ■ which consists of more than 90 percent federally-owned land, including the land where the cross is situated — violates the Establishment Clause of the Unit

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges: The opinion in this case announces the rule that Congress cannot cure a government agency’s Establishment Clause violation by ordering sale of the land upon which a religious symbol previously was situated. Because such a novel rule contravenes go

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANK BUONO,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIRK KEMPTHORNE,* Secretary of No. 05-55852 the Interior, in his official D.C. No. capacity; JONATHAN B. JARVIS, CV-01-00216-RT Regional Director, Pacific West Region, National Park Service,  ORDER

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1263 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1264 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO