Cases

Opinion issued December 3, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00039-CV ——————————— MMR CONSTRUCTORS, INC., Appellant V. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellee

2020 WI 2 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2361 COMPLETE TITLE: Chris Hinrichs and Autovation Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. The DOW Chemical Company d/b/a Dow Automotive, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. REVIEW OF

CORRIGAN, J. The 173 plaintiffs in this matter have asked to represent a putative class of thousands in an action against defendant, The Dow Chemical Company. Their core allegation is that Dow’s plant in Midland, Michigan, negligently released dioxin, a synthetic chemical that is potentially hazardous to human health,1 into the Tittabawassee flood plain w

198 B.R. 214 (1996) In re DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-20512. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. July 16, 1996. *215 *216 *217 *218 Barbara J. Houser, Dallas, TX, Craig J. Lit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On January 5, 2016, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Plaintiff LTJ Enterprises, Inc.’s (“LTJ”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 61], Defendant Custom Marketing Co., LLC’s (“CMC”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 75], CMC’s Motion to Exclude E

505 F.Supp. 903 (1981) CHRISTENSEN HATCH FARMS, INC., Alvin G. Ayers and Donald M. Schmitt, Plaintiffs, v. PEAVEY COMPANY, Cayman Associates, Inc., Cayman Associates-Murlas Brothers Commodities, Inc. and Ralph Goelz, Defendants. No. Civil 3-80-287. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. January 13, 1981. *904

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

838 So.2d 821 (2003) AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY v. TEXACO, INC., et al. No. 02-240. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. January 29, 2003. Rehearing Denied March 19, 2003. *825 J. Michael Veron, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Jr., Scofield, Gerard, Veron, Singletary & Pohorelsky, Lake Charles, LA, Anthony J. Fo

Western Atlas & Coastal v. Randolph & Kutash NUMBER 13-02-00244-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

647 F.Supp. 303 (1986) Woodrow STERLING, et al, Plaintiffs, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 78-1100. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, E.D. August 1, 1986. *304 *305 *306 James S. Wilder, III, Somerville, Tenn., Sidney W. Gilrea

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand and Memorandum in Support Thereof, filed March 23,-2016 (Doc. 8)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on July 11, 2016. The primary issue is whether the Court should remand the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) for, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, b

Opinion issued August 30, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00621-CV ——————————— SUPPLY PRO, INC. AND HARMON K. FINE, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. ECOSORB INTERNATIONAL, INC. D/B/A

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM H. BARBOUR, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motions of Plaintiff to Remand. Having considered the pleadings, the attachments thereto, as well as supporting and opposing authorities, the Court finds the Motions are not well taken and should be denied. I. Factual Background and Procedural History In June of

263 S.W.3d 827 (2008) COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY v. John G. MORGAN et al. No. M2006-00591-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 4, 2008 Session. September 9, 2008. *832 Ron L. Quigley, Davis, Matthews & Quigley, P.C., and Stephen H. Price, Stites & Harbison, PLLC, for the appellee, Colo

067-250449-11 FILED TARRANT COUNTY 4/30/2015 5:03:18 PM THOMAS A. WILDER CAUSE NO. 067-250449-11

249 F.Supp.2d 622 (2003) ID SECURITY SYSTEMS CANADA, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.A.99-577. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 28, 2003. *629 Rudolph Garcia, J. Clayton Undercofler, III, William A. De Stefano, Kara H. Good child, Saul Ewing LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for ID Secur

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 79, 81, 86, 87 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint alleges that defendants created a complex criminal enterprise involving fake companies, fake identifications, and large-scale illegal taping of reproductive health care conferences and private meetings in order to advance their goal

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

348 B.R. 111 (2006) In re ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 00-4471. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 14, 2006. *112 Rebecca L. Booth, Mark D. Collins, Jason M. Madron, Rebecca Lee Scalio, Deborah E. Spivack, Shannon Stacy Frazier, Richards, Layton & Finger, Joanne Bianco

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri