⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Boutin v. Exxon Mobil Corporation”

District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-07-30 · Published · cited 7× · 730 F. Supp. 2d 660; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77095; 2010 WL 3056818
730 F.Supp.2d 660 (2010) Kimberly BOUTIN, Plaintiff, v. EXXON MOBIL CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-0322. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 30, 2010. *663 Melissa Moore, Moore & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Ethel J. Johnson, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Housto
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 213 A.3d 877
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-07-30 · Published · cited 33× · 795 F.3d 1057; 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13273; 2015 WL 4568722
OPINION FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Porfiria Yocupicio appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to remand this matter to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles (“Superior Court”) after PAE Group, LLC, and Arch Resources Group, LLC (collectively, “Arch”) removed 1
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018-02-14 · Published · cited 4× · 293 F. Supp. 3d 600
ROBERT G. JAMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 22] filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Plaintiff Jerry L. Johnson opposes the motion. [Doc. No. 27]. For reasons assigned below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant employed Plaintiff, an Army veteran who served in the
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015-04-07 · Published · cited 8× · 102 F. Supp. 3d 867; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45335; 2015 WL 1539274
ORDER KURT D. ENGELHARDT, District Judge. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 61). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Rec. Doc. 65), and Defendant filed a reply (Rec. Doc. 75). For- the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Rec. Doc. 61) is hereby GRANTED. I. Background
District Court, Virgin Islands · 2014-11-12 · Published · cited 8× · 73 F. Supp. 3d 588; 2014 WL 5859168
MEMORANDUM BARTLE, District Judge. In these consolidated civil actions, plaintiffs Jose Illaraza (“Jose”) and Luis Illara-za (“Luis”),1 who are brothers, bring claims against defendant HOVENSA, LLC (“HOVENSA”) for wrongful discharge, slander and defamation per se, tortious interference with contractual relationship, abuse of process, malicious prosecution; and
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 5× · 416 B.R. 801; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 77; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2374; 2009 WL 2710266
416 B.R. 801 (2009) In re ELECTRIC MACHINERY ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. Electric Machinery Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc., The Clark Construction Group, Inc., and Construct Two Construction Managers, Inc., individually and as joint venturers trading as Hunt/Clark/Construct Two, a Joint Venture, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 8:03-bk-11047-MGW. Adversary No. 8:03-ap-00811-MGW.