Cases

BROWN, Judge. [1] State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) appeals the trial court’s order on verdict and judgment in favor of Sean Woodgett. State Farm raises three issues, one of which we find dispositive and which we revise and restate as whether the court abused its discretion in excluding certain evidence. We reverse and remand.

GRIMM, Judge. I respectfully dissent. The policy language determines the rights and obligations of the parties. Three sections deserve special mention. First, the Reames’ policy states: “Defined words are printed in bold face italics.” In this opinion, bold print is used where the policy uses bold face italics. Second, the policy defines the term “insured.” It says “ins

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, FOR PUBLICATION September 3, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:05 a.m. v

685 S.E.2d 263 (2009) 286 Ga. 23 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATON et al. No. S09G0348. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 19, 2009. *264 Cubbedge Snow III, Thomas P. Allen III, Martin Snow, LLP, Macon, for appellant. David F. Guldenschuh, John A. Owens, J. Clinton Sumner Jr.,

218 S.W.3d 517 (2007) Joseph J. KELLY, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., et al., Appellants. No. WD 66408. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 23, 2007. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 27, 2007. Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2007.

120 Ga. App. 740 (1969) 172 S.E.2d 139 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DILBECK et al. 44477. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued June 4, 1969. Decided November 12, 1969. Rehearing Denied December 1, 1969. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr., for appellant. <

GRIMM, Judge. Relator seeks a writ of prohibition against respondent prohibiting him from denying a motion to quash and dismiss the case for improper venue. We grant the writ by making our preliminary order in prohibition permanent. The underlying action involves an automobile accident. Plaintiff Charles Hyatt allegedly sustained personal injuries when his vehicle collided with a vehicle driven by Charlotte

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 559 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 560 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY

549 S.E.2d 740 (2001) 250 Ga. App. 100 GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WILKERSON. No. A01A0811. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 29, 2001. Reconsideration Denied June 14, 2001. *741 Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, Glenn Whitley, Tifton, for appellant. James W. Hurt,

SAUFLEY, C.J. [¶ 1] Denise and David Bowden appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) on York Insurance Company of Maine’s complaint for a declaratory judgment. The Bowdens contend that the court erred in declaring that they were not entitled to recover pursuant to their York underin-sured vehicle policy. Because we conclude that the vehicle that collided with the Bow

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1979 ___________________________ Matthew Achey; Jessica Achey Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; Ohio Security Insurance Company

247 S.W.3d 690 (2008) Kathryn Aylor BOWDEN, Beulah Poorman Vick, Omer F. Poorman, Monte Cluck, Royce Yarbrough, and Benny Ted Powell, Petitioners, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, GPM Gas Corporation, Phillips Gas Marketing Company, Phillips Gas Company, and GPM Gas Trading Company, Respondents. No. 03-0824. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 1, 2004. Decide

HEARD, Judge. This is a tort action by Homer Vascoe, doing business as National Motors, against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, liability insurer of Nell Bowden. On October 2, 1970 at about 6:00 o’clock A.M. the Vascoe vehicle, driven by Harold W. Zumwalt, stalled on Linwood Avenue. It is undisputed that Zumwalt was neither agent nor servant of Vascoe. As the shoulders on Linwood

300 S.W.3d 671 (2009) Tom SPEARS, et al. v. TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. M2008-00842-COA-R3-CV Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. October 17, 2008 Session. July 17, 2009. Published Pursuant to R. 11, Tennessee Court of Appeals. *672 Tim L. Bowden, Good

150 So.2d 655 (1963) Gwendolyn T. BOWDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 800. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 5, 1963. Gravel, Sheffield & Futhrer, by James S. Gravel and Leonard Fuhrer, Alexandria, McKeithen, Mouser & McKinley, Columbia, for plaintiff-appellant. Gist,

136 Ga. App. 499 (1975) 221 S.E.2d 832 COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOWDEN et al. 50987. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted September 8, 1975. Decided October 20, 1975. Rehearing Denied November 10, 1975. Richter & Birdsong, A. W. Birdsong, Jr., for appellant. Bray &

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 30, 2010 Session ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DIANA LYNN TARRANT, et al. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 08-10-463 Hon. Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor No. E2009-02431-COA-R3-CV - FILED OCTOBER 21, 2010 Plaintiff insurer brought this declaratory judgment action to determine which of the two policies issued to de

OPINION MOISE, Justice. We are here called upon to determine the relative rights of two insurance companies in connection with a loss covered by policies issued by each. At all material times the plaintiff, Maryland Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as “Maryland,” had in force a comprehensive general liability policy insuring R. R. Burke and

In October 1994, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed an interpleader action against Debra C. Barbee and several other defendants. The action arose from a multiple-vehicle accident involving William Michael Bowden, State Farm's insured. State Farm interpleaded $89,500, the balance of the policy limits after other settlements, into the trial court. Following a hearing, the trial court entered a judgment disbursing the funds among several defendants, including Barbee. In

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON BOWDEN BUILDING CORPORATION, ) ) FILED Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Shelby Chancery No. 108519-2 R.D. ) July 20, 1999 VS. ) Appeal No. 02A01-9807-CH-00175 )