Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Bownes v. International Game Technology PLC”

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus B.V.public domain

District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-11-02 · Published · cited 9× · 144 F. Supp. 3d 530; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148322; 2015 WL 6674818

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: On March 11, 2014, Regeneron filed twin patent infringement actions: one against Merus B.V. (“Merus”), a company based in the Netherlands, and another against Ablexis LLC (“Ablexis”). (See ECF No. 1.) In short complaints, each consisting of a few substantive paragraphs, Regeneron accused both companies of infringing U.S. Patent No.

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals → · find the judge →

In Re Pharmatrak, Inc. Privacy Litigationpublic domain

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003-05-09 · Published · cited 11× · 329 F.3d 9; 29 Communications Reg. (P&F) 136; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8758; 2003 WL 21038761

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This case raises important questions about the scope of privacy protection afforded internet users under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511, 2520 (2000). In sum, pharmaceutical companies invited users to visit their websites to learn about their drugs and to obtain rebates. An enterprising compa

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →