⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Boydstun v. Galey”

Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 814 P.2d 941; 120 Idaho 209
BURNETT, Judge. This appeal arises from a dispute between a farmer and a seed producer. The issues are whether the district court correctly (a) ruled that the Uniform Commercial Code was applicable to this case; (b) found that the seed producer had breached an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose under the UCC; (c) determined the extent of the farmer’s damages; and (d) awarded attorney fees to the farmer. For
Idaho Supreme Court · 1991-06-14 · Published · cited 22× · 814 P.2d 917; 120 Idaho 185; 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 799; 1991 Ida. LEXIS 114
814 P.2d 917 (1991) 120 Idaho 185 CLEMENTS FARMS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BEN FISH & SON, and Paul L. Dompe, Defendants-Appellants, and Shields of Idaho, Inc.; Reed Grain & Bean Co.; and John Does I through V, Defendants. No. 19047. Supreme Court of Idaho, Caldwell March 1991 Term. June 14, 1991.