Cases

PER CURIAM: Douglas Alan Jarvis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for preliminary injunction. An order granting or denying injunctive relief is immediately appealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000). However, “[t]o qualify as a case fit for federal-court adjudication, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review .... ” Toms v. Allied Bond & Collection Agency, Inc., 179 F.3d 103, 105

LoConto J. Theplaintiffsbroughtthisactionintortforfraudulentmisrepresentation and nondisclosure of the condition of the siding on the house they purchased from the defendants. The plaintiffs claimed to be aggrieved by the'Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment that there was no fraudulent misrepresentation. At the close of the evidence the court responded to requests entitled ridings of law, as follows:

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ January 11, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A18D0232. JARVIS WARE v. WHITFIELD SUPERIOR COURT. On August 11, 2017, the superior court entered an order denying filing of a mandamus petition submitted by prisoner Jarvis Ware.1 Ware filed an application for discretionary appeal on November 6, 2017.2 We lac

S. Miller, J.P., concurs, with the following memorandum: I agree wholeheartedly with my colleagues’ decision to affirm insofar as appealed from the order denying the motion of the defendant School District for summary judgment, and their conclusion that the holding in Barton v Bee Line (238 App Div 501) is inapplicable to the instant action. I add this concurrence solely to observe that, in citing Barton, the

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 24, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A23A1778. JARVIS SENTELL EVERETT v. THE STATE. Jarvis Sentell Everett entered Alford Pleas to one count each of simple battery - family violence and terroristic threats and acts. Everett was sentenced to five years, with the first 60-90 days to be served in a

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _________________________ No. 94-2215 IN RE: DONALD JARVIS and JOYCE JARVIS, Debtors. __________________________

342 Mich. 100 (1955) 68 N.W.2d 768 FAWLEY v. DOEHLER-JARVIS DIVISION OF NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 45,987. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided March 9, 1955. *101 Joseph E. Arsulowicz, for plaintiff. Warner, Norcross & Judd (Conrad Bradshaw, of counsel

105 U.S. 231 (____) CHATFIELD v. BOYLE. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. John D. McPherson and Mr. Jeremiah W. Clapp in support of the motion. Mr. William M. Ramsey, contra. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court. Boyle & Co., a mercantile firm doing business at Memphis, Tenn., being insolvent, made, on the 17th of Novem

McWhorter, Judge: By deed dated March 31, 1884, Claude S. Jarvis conveyed to his mother, Ann M. Jarvis, certain real estate, as follows: “For and in consideration of natural love and affection, the said party of the first part does grant unto the said partv of the second part the following described real estate, situated in the town of Grafton, Taylor county, West Virginia, consisting of three town lots fronting on Wilfred s

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, District Judge. Plaintiff Janet Jenkins, for herself and as next friend of her daughter Isabella Miller-Jenkins, has brought suit against several individuals and organizations, alleging that they kidnapped and conspired to kidnap Isabella. Plaintiffs assert claims of commission of and conspiracy to commit an intentional tort of kidnapping, violations of

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs, Gary and Rebecca Woodson, brought this civil action against defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), asserting claims for breach of contract and unfair trade practices based on Allstate’s denial of the Woodsons’ insurance claim for flood-related damages to their property following Hurricane Irene

Levin, J. The question presented concerns statutory coordination of weekly worker’s compensation benefits with a lump sum paid to the employee pursuant to his election for early withdrawal, in full liquidation of his interest, from a pension or retirement program established or maintained by his employer. The statute1 provides that the employer’s obligation to remit weekly worker’

[Cite as State v. Pettis, 2024-Ohio-574.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112629 v. : AARON T. PETTIS, :

312 Ga. 801 FINAL COPY S21G0429. GEORGE v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Presiding Justice. After a 2018 jury trial, Harold William George was convicted of two counts of child molestation and related offenses. He appealed to the Court of Appeals of Georgia, which affirmed his convictions in an unpublished opinion. See George v. State, 357 Ga. App. XXIV (Case No. A20A0993) (October 23, 2020). In addressing one of George’s four enumerations of error, the Court of Appeals reje

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. Petitioner Antonio S. Avent (hereinafter “petitioner”) petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pet., D.E. 1. The matter is before the court on respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Resp’t’s Mot. for Summ. J., D.E. 9. Petitioner was given notice of the motion, but did not file any response. See Docket at D.E. 11

Mark S. Davis, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *453This matter is before the Court on Defendant Daryl G. Bank's ("Defendant" or "Bank") Motion to Dismiss for Double Jeopardy Violation. Def.'s Mot., ECF No. 139. Defendant moves to dismiss the pending indictment against him in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kokesh v

[Cite as Schmitz v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn., 2016-Ohio-8041.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103525 STEVEN SCHMITZ, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777

[Cite as State v. Walker, 2021-Ohio-580.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109142 v. : JALEN J. WALKER,

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of