⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Boyle v. Merrill Lynch”

Boyle v. Lynchpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2014-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 5 F. Supp. 3d 425; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35629; 2014 WL 1056409
DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff James P. Boyle (“Boyle” or “Plaintiff’), represented by counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201 et seq. (“ADA”), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 et seq. (“HRL”), alleging that his former employer,
Boyle v. Boylepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012-12-06 · Published · cited 39× · 231 Ariz. 63; 290 P.3d 456; 649 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4; 2012 Ariz. App. LEXIS 201
OPINION HOWE, Judge. ¶ 1 Robert Carter Boyle (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s award of spousal maintenance to Patricia Joanne Boyle (“Wife”). FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2 After a thirty-three year marriage, Wife petitioned for dissolution. The family court dissolved the parties’ marriage and allocated their property. The dissolution decree equitably distrib
Supreme Court of the United States · 1982-05-03 · Published · cited 761× · 72 L. Ed. 2d 182; 102 S. Ct. 1825; 456 U.S. 353; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 100; 50 U.S.L.W. 4457
456 U.S. 353 (1982) MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. v. CURRAN ET AL. No. 80-203. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 2, 1981. Decided May 3, 1982.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *354 Richard P. Saslow argued the cause for pe
Turner v. Boylepublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015-07-15 · Published · cited 35× · 116 F. Supp. 3d 58; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91582; 2015 WL 4393005
ORDER AND RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge. This case arises from the State of Connecticut’s arrest and prosecution of the pro *68se plaintiff, .Harold Turner,.after he published to his website commentary denouncing two Connecticut legislators for then-purported role in “infring
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995-12-15 · Published · cited 15× · 911 F. Supp. 754; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18762; 1995 WL 746866
911 F.Supp. 754 (1995) In re MERRILL LYNCH, et al. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civ. No. 94-5343 (DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 15, 1995. *755 *756 Karen Morris, Morris & Morris, Wilmington, DE, Paul Dillon, Greenberg, Dauber & Epstein, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiffs. <
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00505-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/23/2015 6:28:32 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/23/2015 6:28:32 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk an Order of Foreclosure as required under Tex. R. Civ. P. 7 2. On or about March 21th, 2015 the lower court granted
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 441 F. Supp. 2d 665; 2006 WL 2167202
441 F.Supp.2d 665 (2006) Douglas M. BOYLE and Anthony J. Gouveia, Plaintiffs, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-CV-4463 (DMC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 2, 2006. *666 *667 Ari R. Karpf, Karpf, Karpf & Virant, Bensalem, PA, for Plai
Michigan Supreme Court · 1952-09-04 · Published · cited 3× · 54 N.W.2d 626; 334 Mich. 508; 1952 Mich. LEXIS 421
334 Mich. 508 (1952) 54 N.W.2d 626 LEVENBURG v. MERRILL, LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & BEANE. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 45,043. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided September 4, 1952. *509 Maxwell M. Lowe (Richard G. Eubank, of counsel), for plaintiffs. Dickinson, Wright, Davis, McKea
Boyle v. Boylepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987-04-15 · Published · cited 18× · 735 P.2d 669; 55 Utah Adv. Rep. 51; 1987 Utah App. LEXIS 535
735 P.2d 669 (1987) Vanza Eckersley BOYLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Mark K. BOYLE, Defendant and Respondent. No. 860004-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 15, 1987. *670 Bruce E. Coke, Larry A. Kirkham, Beaslin, Nygaard, Coke & Vincent, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant. Paul H. Liapis, Kent M. Kasting, G
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990-04-27 · Published · cited 14× · 901 F.2d 1124; 284 U.S. App. D.C. 72; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6442; 1990 WL 51885
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge TIMBERS. TIMBERS, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellants Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) and William J. Grace, Jr. appeal from an order entered June 19, 1989, in the District Court for the District of Columbia, Royce C. Lam-berth, District Judge, which
Thompson v. Boylepublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 1980-07-08 · Published · cited 25× · 499 F. Supp. 1147
499 F.Supp. 1147 (1980) Dorothy M. THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. John J. BOYLE, Public Printer, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 74-1101. United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 1, 1979. On Issue of Relief May 20, 1980. As Amended July 8, 1980. *1148 Nora A. Bailey, Ivins, Phillips &a;
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984-08-06 · Published · cited 126× · 41 B.R. 985; 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 196; 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5258; 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 44
41 B.R. 985 (1984) In re INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. In re UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, aka National Clearing House Company, a Trust, Debtor. In re ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. Robert D. MERRILL, Trustee, v. David ABBOTT, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 81A-02886, 81A-02887 and 81A-03704, Adv. No. 83PA-0986. United States Bankruptc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998-01-30 · Published · cited 44× · 135 F.3d 266
135 F.3d 266 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,130Kenneth E. NEWTON; MLPF & S Cust. Bruce Zakheim IRA FBO Bruce Zakheimv.MERRILL, LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.; PaineWebberInc.; Dean Witter Reynolds.Jeffrey Phillip KRAVITZv.DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.MLPF & S Cust. FPO-Bruce Zakheim Ira FBO Bruce Zakheim,Jeffrey Phillip Kravitz, And Gloria Binder, Appellants. No. 96-5045.
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2008-03-17 · Published · cited 3× · 553 F. Supp. 2d 680; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21501; 2008 WL 865090
553 F.Supp.2d 680 (2008) SUPER FUTURE EQUITIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., as Trustee of the Certificate Holders of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors CMBS Pass Through Certificates Series 1999-C1, Orix Capital Markets, LLC, Orix Capital Markets Partnership, John Dinan, Michael Wurst, Clifford Weiner, and James R. Thompson, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06-Cv-0271-B. United St
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-07-27 · Published · cited 40× · 615 F.3d 496; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15305; 2010 WL 2901049
615 F.3d 496 (2010) CITY OF CLEVELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.; Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; Countrywide Securities Corporation; Credit Suisse First Boston LLC; Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.; Goldman Sachs & Co.; Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.; Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc.; GMAC-RFC; HSBC Securities (USA), Inc.; JP Morgan Acquisition Corp.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-07-01 · Published · cited 5× · 2021 Ohio 2267
[Cite as Estate of Battle-King v. Heartland of Twinsburg, 2021-Ohio-2267.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ESTATE OF MARY BATTLE-KING, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110023 v. :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 2023 Ohio 1893
[Cite as JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Loseke, 2023-Ohio-1893.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111983 v. : NANCY L. LOSEKE, ET AL.,
O'Connor v. Corypublic domain
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2019-01-03 · Published · cited 0× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 534
JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs sold their company to the Defendants' company. A purchasing agreement memorialized the transaction. Plaintiffs bring claims for securities fraud and common-law fraud against Defendants based on alleged misrepresentations in this Agreement. Defendants now move for summary judgment on a number of grounds. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motions because (1) Plaintiffs
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 2018 Ohio 2049; 113 N.E.3d 1007
Timothy D. Smith, Karen Lefton, The Lefton Group, L.L.C., 3480 W. Market Street, Suite 304, Akron, Ohio 44333, ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS. Barbara Langhenry, Director of Law, City of Cleveland, William M. Menzalora, Chief Assistant Director of Law, 601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 106, Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Jon M. Dileno, Jessi L. Ziska, Zashin & Rich Co., L.P.A., 950 Main Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 4411
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011-09-22 · Published · cited 0× · 820 F. Supp. 2d 695; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121750; 2011 WL 5009535
820 F.Supp.2d 695 (2011) SHEARLINE BOATWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Peter Alvin TROST, III, Defendant. No. 4:11-CV-71-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. September 22, 2011. *696 Russell Clayton Alexander, Wesley A. Collins, Harvell & Collins, P.A., Morehead City, NC, for Plaintiff. Do