Cases

327 S.W.3d 5 (2010) Kris KOMSKY, Pat Ford, Diane Komsky, Next Friend of Alexandra Komsky, a Minor, and of Victoria Komsky, a Minor, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Mick J. Howard, Respondents, v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Intervenor/Appellant. No. ED 94562. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. October 1

218 S.W.3d 527 (2007) Curtis BURROWS, Respondent, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, Appellants. No. ED 87314. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. January 23, 2007. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 6, 2007. Application for Transfer

882 N.E.2d 522 (2008) 227 Ill.2d 377 EAGLE MARINE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 102462. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 25, 2008. *523 Thomas E. Jones, Heath H. Hooks, of Thompson Coburn LLP, Belleville, Hugh C. Griffin, Stevie A. Starnes, of Hall

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Dustin D. Hess ("Hess"), appeals from a grant of summary judgment by the district court 1 in favor of Union Pacific Railroad, a Delaware Corporation ("Union Pacific"). Hess claims that he was terminated for engaging in a protected activity. Union Pacific countered, and the district cou

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. The Union Pacific Railroad Company seeks a refund of about $75 million in taxes that it paid the federal government from 1991 to 2007 under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. UP maintains that the RRTA did not require it to pay taxes when it paid employees in stock or made what are called ratification payments to union-member employees. The district court

SWANSTROM, Judge. This appeal comes to us from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad. The plaintiff, Donald Dustin, brought suit under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. (FELA) to recover for back and knee injuries sustained during his employment with Union Pacific. The railroad moved for summary judgment based on a release of claims signed by Dustin.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3574 ___________________________ Union Pacific Railroad Company, in its own capacity and in its capacity as successor to Union Pacific Railroad Company lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v.

598 F.Supp.2d 955 (2009) Robert DAVIS, Plaintiff v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 4:07CV00521 BSM. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. February 18, 2009. Edward T. Oglesby, Oglesby Law Firm P.A., Little Rock, AR, Nelson Gregory Wolff, Andrew S. Williams, Julia M. Eades, Roger Clark Denton, Schlichter, Bogard & Den

MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Craig E. Coash appeals the district court’s order granting Union Pacific Railroad Company’s motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of record, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the thorough report and recommendations issued by Magistrate Judge Boyle.1 Coash is hereby ordered to file a brief within fourteen (14) d

Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Reversed and Remanded; Opinions of October 5, 2004 Withdrawn and Opinion on Rehearing filed November 29, 2005 Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Reversed and Remanded; Opinions of October 5, 2004 Withdrawn and Opinion on Rehearing filed November 29, 2005.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF SURVEILLANCE MATERIALS BROOKS, United States Magistrate Judge. On April 24, 2000, this Court heard oral arguments on Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application to Compel Production of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Surveillance Materials. Thomas Peters of Fogel, Feld-man, Ostrov, Ringler & Elevens, appeared on behalf of Plaintiff

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska denied.

591 F.3d 1311 (2010) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-7102. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 5, 2010. *1312 Sarang V. Damle, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division (Michael F. Hertz, Acting As

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-2006 Filed December 15, 2021 MARK BENSON d/b/a BENSON BORDER MATERIALS, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. BOYLE BUILT ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., and ANDREW BOYLE, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Van Buren County, Crystal S. Cronk, Judge.

Case Number: 14-02-00688-CV 10/06/2010 Letter Filed 04/19/2010 Letter Filed 02/10/2010 Case stored in record room 01/15/2010 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed Denied with Justice not sitting. 01/15/2010 Mandate issued 12/10/2009 Motion for Rehearing for pet #2 - Filed 12/10/2009 Case forwarded to Court 11/06/2009 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed Granted 11/05/2009 M/E/T to file motion for rehearing 11/03/2009 Description of document returned to Supreme Court 10/23/2009 Opinion issued

246 P.3d 867 (2011) 2011 WY 24 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. CABALLO COAL COMPANY, Appellee (Defendant). Caballo Coal Company, Appellant (Defendant), v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Appellee (Plaintiff). Nos. S-10-0112, S-10-0113. Supreme Court of Wyoming. February 14, 2011.

453 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2006) David CONNOLLY, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 4:05-CV-1905 CAS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. September 21, 2006. *1105 *1106 Thomas C. Jones, Davis and Bethune, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff.</

COLLET, Circuit Judge. The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, hereafter referred to as the Rio Grande, filed a complaint with the Interstate Commerce Commission requesting the Commission to order the Union Pacific Railroad Company (and other lines comprising the Union Pacific System, together with connecting carriers comprising, in all, 221 railroads, which will be referred to as the Union Pacific) to file joint

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co., 2012 IL App (5th) 100504 Appellate Court WALTER FENNELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL Caption RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Fifth District Docket No. 5-10-0504 Filed January 3, 2012 Held

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-2039 Filed February 19, 2020 RICHARD J. WERMERSKIRCHEN and CAROL M. WERMERSKIRCHEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD, a/k/a CN, a/k/a CN RAILWAY; CHICAGO CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD, a/k/a CCP ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY; TIM DORSEY, and JOSH YOKEM, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________