Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION BEATY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Anna Beck’s and Roger and Ella Townsend’s Motions to Dismiss [Documents # 33 & # 35] and Plaintiffs Gordon and Connie Shinn’s Motion for Leave to Amend the [First] Amended Complaint [Document #56], I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On April 29, 2001, Plaintiff Gordon Shinn was

360 S.C. 413 (2004) 602 S.E.2d 51 Richard ADKINS, Shakur Ali, Kelly Ayers, Phillip Barnett, Terry Beachum, Phillip Bennett, Bobby Boozer, John Brannon, Christopher Brown, Norman Bryson, Bernard Byrd, Sirrico Burnside, Bradley Cain, Donnie Clark, Francis Coker, John Cosby, Robert Davila, Billy Joe Davis, Bobby Davis, Terry Elliott, David Ellison, Robert Elmore, Garnell Evans, Anthony Frazier, Calvin Garrett, Charles Gove, Willie Gr

595 F.3d 1258 (2010) William CLARK, Thomas Figures, Joe L. Reed, Dr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bob RILEY, Governor, in his official capacity, Elton Dean, in his official capacity as Chair of the board of Trustees of Alabama State University, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-11978. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 4, 2010.

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of former Deputy Commissi

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Decision and Order except for minor modifications; therefore, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner.

[Cite as Conley v. Wapakoneta City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 2022-Ohio-2915.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY TREY R. CONLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 2-21-18 v. WAPAKONETA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 952 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 953 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–0827 Filed July 11, 2014 IOWA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, IOWA RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION, and IOWA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION, Appellants, and AGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA, ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, IOWA CATTLEMEN’S ASSOCIATION, IOWA INSTITUTE FOR COOPERATIVES, IOWA LIMESTONE PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, IOWA PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, IOWA POULTRY ASSOCIA

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ KCPA And Unjust Enrichment Claims (Doc. # 2705) filed November 1, 2011. Defendants argue that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Kansas law specifically authorizes the sale of motor fuel without disclosing or adjusting f

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT WILLIAMS, Judge. This dispute arises under a contract for the replacement of the electrical distribution system at Keesler Air Force Base (AFB) in Biloxi, Mississippi (the Contract). Plaintiff claims that the Contract gave it the right to become a cable television operator on base and that the Navy breached its implied duty to cooperate and not to hi

46 Cal.3d 796 (1988) 760 P.2d 399 251 Cal. Rptr. 202 FAR WEST FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. D & S COMPANY, INC., et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S000606. Supreme Court of California. September 15, 1988. *798 COUNSEL

In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST Nos. 19-1115C; 19-1162C; 19-1168C; 19-1169C; 19-1178C; 19-1189C; 19-1296C (Consolidated) (Filed Under Seal: June 4, 2020 | Reissued: June 25, 2020) ∗ ) TECHNOLOG

OPINION YOCK, Judge. These consolidated civilian pay cases1 are before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of certain plaintiffs on collateral estoppel grounds and on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ seven claims.2 For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of 227

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV