Cases

Bradshaw v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 07060) Bradshaw v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 07060 Decided on December 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

Bradshaw v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 07060) Bradshaw v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 07060 Decided on December 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

Read, J. (dissenting). Today’s decision brings to mind the New York State Lottery’s slogan: “Hey, you never know.” My colleagues in the majority, unlike Lottery officials, are not trying to encourage participation in a game of chance, but our trial judges might well be forgiven for concluding that the Court has now transformed the taking of an appeal waiver into something equally uncertain of outcome. This is perha

Sloane v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 00488) Sloane v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 00488 Decided on January 23, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

[Cite as State v. Bradshaw, 2023-Ohio-1244.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT LOGAN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 8-22-09 v. DENNIS J. BRADSHAW, JR., OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Logan County Common Pleas Court Trial C

Appellate Case: 23-5074 Document: 72-1 Date Filed: 12/17/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 17, 2024

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Walter Carver appeals from an April 1, 2009 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sifton, /.), dismissing his complaint for lack of standing. As a recipient of public assistance from the City of New York, Carver was required to work for the City, and was paid minimum wage, under a program funded in whole or part by the State of New York. State

*633Applying “the narrowly restricted level of appellate review governing ‘insufficiency-as-a-matter-of-law’ challenges” to jury verdicts (see Campbell v City of Elmira, 84 NY2d 505, 509-510 [1994]), we find that the jury’s verdict apportioning liability for plaintiffs injuries 40% to the City and 60% to Brian Morales was rationally supported by the evidence. Contrary to the City’s content

Wiltz v New York Univ. (2023 NY Slip Op 03215) Wiltz v New York Univ. 2023 NY Slip Op 03215 Decided on June 13, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Wiltz v New York Univ. (2023 NY Slip Op 03215) Wiltz v New York Univ. 2023 NY Slip Op 03215 Decided on June 13, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered September 8, 2010, which, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiff a total of $1,003,649, including $268,000 for past pain *429and suffering and $600,000 for future pain and suffering for 40 years, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the awards for past and future pain and suffering and order a new trial solely as to those da

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered February 6, 2006, upon a jury verdict, in favor of defendants-respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict was properly denied since, based on the trial evidence, the jury could have rationally concluded (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]) that on the occasion in question defendant taxicab ope

779 F.Supp.2d 289 (2011) T.K. and S.K., Individually and on Behalf of L.K., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. No. 10-CV-00752. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 25, 2011. *292 Gary S. Mayerson, Brianne Nicole Dotts, Mayerson and Associates, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Patricia Y. Lashley-Smith and Allwin Smith, Appellants, againstJoy Bradshaw, Respondent, et al., Undertenants. Syntyche Stephenson, Esq., for appellants. The Legal Aid Society (Alexander J. Stone-Tharp and Adriene Holder of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Michael L. Weisberg, J.), dated February 27,

JOHN K. BUSH, Circuit Judge. A recantation is not always a good reason for a new trial. The recanting witness, in fact, may have told the truth the first time. Other evidence may corroborate the earlier testimony over the recantation. Such is the case here. Ian Davis is currently incarcerated for the assault and murder of Marsha Blakely. His conviction was based on

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered June 21, 2001, which, upon granting the respective motions of the defendants pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the plaintiffs case, is in favor of the defendants and against her, dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law,

Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2015 NCBC 76. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 14 CVS 14445 JAMES W. BRADSHAW, CARLA O. BRADSHAW, RESORT RETAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., E.C. BROADFOOT, CHRISTINA DUNN CHANDRA, JAMES DOYLE, THOMAS F. EGAN, CHARLES EGGERT, MARK P. GARSIDE, CLARK GREEN, DR. JAMES J. GREEN, JR., ROBERT K. GRUNEWALD, RONALD HOLMES, DAVID LAUCK, CUR

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants City of New York and Joseph Aragona and Sons, Inc., doing business as Cin-Mar Developers, Inc., separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated July 27, 2001, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against each of the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. Introduction This habeas action has a lengthy history. At the center of this case is the sad but all-too-common thread of drug addiction and drug-trafficking violence. In 1996, a jury convicted Petitioner Alfred Cleveland of aggravated murder for the 1991 slaying of Marsha Blakely. Three other individuals

Saxe, J. (dissenting in part.) This Court has today expanded the legal duty of physicians beyond the boundaries established by recent Court of Appeals’ pronouncements that have strictly limited the parameters of tort responsibility where a defendant has no direct, legally defined relationship with the plaintiff. While well intentioned and well presented, the majority’s determination could have a detrimental impact on the practice o