Cases

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an action filed by nine professional football players and one prospective football player (“the Players”) against the National Football League and its thirty-two separately-owned clubs, more commonly known as football teams (collectively, “the NFL” or “the League”). On March 11, 2011, a collective bargaining agreement between the League and a union representing professional foo

640 F.3d 785 (2011) Tom BRADY; Drew Brees; Vincent Jackson; Ben Leber; Logan Mankins; Peyton Manning; Von Miller; Brian Robison; Osi Umenyiora; Mike Vrabel; Carl Eller; Priest Holmes; Obafemi Ayanbadejo; Ryan Collins; Antawan Walker, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC; Atlanta Falcons Football Club, LLC; Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership; Bu

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0066p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ AARON SALTER, │ Plaintiff-Appellee

R. STEVEN WHALEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Relevant to Plaintiff's Monell Claim, as well as the Individual Defendants' Personnel Files, Disciplinary records, Training Records, and Handwritten Notes [Doc. # 39]. For the reasons and under the terms discussed below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. On September 17,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0050p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GREEN GENIE, INC.; ALVIN ALOSACHI, │ Pl

723 N.W.2d 464 (2006) 271 Mich. App. 692 Gary A. BROWN and Harold C. Nelthrope, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MAYOR OF DETROIT and City of Detroit, Defendants-Appellants. Gary A. Brown and Harold C. Nelthrope, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mayor of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant, and City of Detroit, Defendant. Docket Nos. 259911, 259923. Court of Appeals of Michigan.

46 F.3d 528 66 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1569 N.A.A.C.P., DETROIT BRANCH; The Guardians, Inc.; BradyBruenton; Cynthia Martin; Hilton Napoleon; SharronRandolph; Betty T. Roland; Grant Battle; Cynthia Cheatom;Evin Fobbs; John H. Hawkins; Helen Poelinitz, on behalfof themselves and all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIO

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS APEX LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL FOR PUBLICATION INC., January 2, 2020 9:00 a

Opinion Regarding Eligibilitg STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. The Congress shall have Power To ... establish ... uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.... Article I, Section 8, United States Constitution No ... law impairing the obligation of contract shall be enacted. Article I, Section 10, Michigan

Memorandum Regarding: I. Certification Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) (2) (A) (i) II. Recommendation on Whether Direct Appeals Should Be Authorized and III. Parties’ Request to Recommend Expedited Consideration of Appeals STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Summary Under

353 Mich. 243 (1958) 91 N.W.2d 257 BRADY v. CITY OF DETROIT. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 46,466. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided July 15, 1958. *245 Daniel G. Shea and Harry E. Warning, for plaintiffs. Nathaniel H. Goldstick, Corporation Counsel, and Robert Reese, Assis

714 F.Supp.2d 708 (2010) Nathaniel Maurice HATCHETT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Kenneth Williams, Hilton Napoleon, City of Sterling Heights, Michael Reece, Scott Lucas, Richard Van Sice, Jeffrey Plaunt, County of Macomb, Carl Marlinga and Eric Kaiser, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-CV-11864. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 10, 2010.

Per Curiam. In these consolidated appeals, defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s decision denying their motions for summary disposition based on MCR 2.116(C)(8). We reverse. i. facts and proceedings The political subdivision plaintiffs in this case are among the numerous political subdivisions nationwide that have filed suit against firearms manufacturers, distributors, and retaile

454 F.Supp.2d 645 (2006) Darell Deon CHANCELLOR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, a municipal corporation, P.O. William "Robo Cop" Melendez, P.O. Troy Bradley, and P.O. Jeffrey Weiss, individually and in their official capacity, Defendants. Civil Case No. 03-40344. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2006.

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, American Casualty Company (“American”), appeals from a judgment holding it liable as surety on a performance bond for two construction contracts between Brady Mechanical, Inc. (“Brady”) and the City of Detroit (“City”). In a consolidated case, the City of Detroit as defendant and third party plaintiff, appeals the district court’s denial of its

OPINION GILMORE, District Judge. Absent action by the Court of Appeals,1 with this opinion, this Court closes the books on this long-going litigation that commenced in 1980. Before the Court is a motion by Plaintiffs seeking a determination that they are entitled to reinstatement of an award of fees made by this Court in 19852

676 F.Supp. 790 (1988) NAACP, DETROIT BRANCH; The Guardians, Inc.; Brady Bruenton; Cynthia Martin; Hilton Napoleon; Sharron Randolph; Betty T. Roland; Grant Battle; Cynthia Cheatom; Evin Fobbs; John Hawkins; Helen Poelinitz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (DPOA); Thomas Schneider; President of the DPOA; City of Detroit, a Michigan Municipal Corporation; Mayor Coleman A

OPINION GILMORE, District Judge. In its most recent opinion in this case1, this Court held, on remand from the Court of Appeals, 821 F.2d 328, that plaintiff could maintain an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant City of Detroit (City), and that the defendant Detroit Police Officers Association’s (DPOA) motion for summary judgment on a

620 F.Supp. 1173 (1985) NAACP, DETROIT BRANCH; the Guardians, Inc.; Brady Bruenton; Cynthia Martin; Hilton Napoleon; Sharron Randolph; Betty T. Roland; Grant Battle; Cynthia Cheatom; Evin Fobbs; John Hawkins; Helen Poelinitz; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (DPOA); David Watroba, President of the DPOA; City of Detroit, a Michigan Municipal Corporation; Mayor Coleman A.

Cavanagh, J. I. respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a cause of action created by defendant’s city charter and brought against the city of Detroit would contravene the governmental tort liability act (gtla), MCL 691.1407. I further object to the majority’s assertion that plaintiff must plead in avoidance of governmental immunity. In reaching its