Cases

APPENDIX A pro se see Davis v. Geithner et seq See Davis v. Geithner et seq. et seq. et seq. Id. Id. See Davis id. id. id. id. id. id. id. id. id.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, Audrey Easaw, a former employee of the American Association of Retired Persons (“AARP”), brings this action against defendants Debbie Newport and Calade Partners, LLC (collectively, the “defendants”), alleging a violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. Code §§ 2-1

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge *5Mary Tyes-Williams, an African-American woman, has worked in various chaplaincy positions for the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) since 2004. She describes the first decade of her career as a steady climb marked by superior performance reviews and robust skills development. After 11 years with BOP, however, she ran into trouble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARY TYES-WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1191 (TJK) MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Mary Tyes-Williams, an African-American woman, has worked in various chaplaincy positions for the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) since

GURICH, J. Facts & Procedural History {1 Wilson Paving & Excavating, Inc. was one of several subcontractors retained to perform services in connection with a renovation project at Sand Springs Memorial Stadium at Charles Page High School. Specifically, Wilson Paving contracted to dig trenches and lay pipe for a storm drainage system being installed under the school's athletic field. Wilson Paving util

Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Pamela Carter-Frost ("Ms. Carter-Frost") brings three claims against Defendant District of Columbia ("District") for events arising from her employment with the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department ("MPD"). Her complaint alleges (1) gender discrimination; (2) retaliation; and (3) a hostile work environment-all i

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. July 30, 2012, ECF No. 6. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, plaintiffs opposition, ECF No. 13, defendant’s reply, ECF No. 16, applicable law, and the record in this case,

GURICH, J., with whom COLBERT, J., joins, concurring specially: ¶ 1 The bottom fine in the case before us is this: The state of Oklahoma can either, allow an employer to opt out1 of the state’s workers’ compensation system entirely and lose exclusive remedy protections; OR the state can,require an employer to provide coverage for work-place injuries under the state’s workers’ c

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) PAMELA CARTER-FROST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) Civil Action No. 15-930 (EGS) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION [Dkt. # 4] RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Albert V. Peyus, Jr. (“plaintiff’) brings this suit against the defendant Ray Lahood, Secretary for the U.S. Department of Transportation (“defendant”), alleging discrimination based on age and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Righ

EDMONDSON, J. I. Introduction T1 Petitioner, a former employee, filed a workers' compensation claim and alleged she was injured on-the-job and needed surgery. Her former employer (employer) argued that she was barred from receiving workers' compensation because she alleged a cumulative-trauma injury and she had not worked a continuous 180-day period for that employer. The administrative law judge denied her

979 So.2d 997 (2008) SDG DADELAND ASSOCIATES, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Violet C. ANTHONY, Appellee. No. 3D05-2666. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 13, 2008. Rehearing and Rehearing Denied April 22, 2008. *998 Luks, Santaniello, Perez, Petrillo & Gold and Paul S. Jones a

OSCN Found Document:VASQUEZ v. DILLARD'S, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

OSCN Found Document:BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Re

Re Document No.: 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting in Part and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Leslie M. Cornish (“Cornish”), an employee at the Superior Court of th

OSCN Found Document:TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLC OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge. Alfreda Hyson brings this action against the Architect of the Capitol, alleging that the Architect and its employees discriminated against her on the basis of her gender, retaliated against her for undertaking protected activities, and harassed her, creating a hostile work environment, in v

552 F.Supp.2d 74 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Matthew D. WEST, Defendant. Criminal Action No. 06-10281-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 7, 2008. John T. McNeil, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for United States of America. SENTENCING MEMORANDUM[1] YOUNG, District Judge.