Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brandy L Watson”
WISE, Justice. Debora Willingham, as the administrator of the estate of Brandy Matthews, deceased (“Willingham”), appeals from a summary judgment entered by the DeKalb Circuit Court (“the trial court”) on her complaint for a judgment declaring the rights, duties, and liabilities of the parties under § 43-8-253, Ala.Code 1975, which is known as “the Slayer’s Statute.”
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division BRANDY B. SHADDOX, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD38318
United States v. Gary Cardacipublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. The government has been trying to collect unpaid taxes assessed against Gary S. Cardaci, and, to that end, it sought the judicial sale of the home he owns in New Jersey with his wife, Beverly. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey concluded that a forced sale would be inequitable and ins
Willie C. Johnson v. Brandy N. Thomaspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CT-01210-SCT WILLIE C. JOHNSON v. BRANDY N. THOMAS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND, JOHN POLATSIDIS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOSEPH H. LOPER, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WINSTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
Danny Flores v. City of San Gabrielpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANNY FLORES; ROBERT BARADA; Nos. 14-56421 KEVIN WATSON; VY VAN; RAY 14-56514 LARA; DANE WOOLWINE; RIKIMARU NAKAMURA; D.C. No. CHRISTOPHER WENZEL; SHANNON 2:12-cv-04884- CASILLAS; JAMES JUST; STEVE JGB- JCG RODRIGUES; ENRIQUE DEANDA, Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants, OPINION
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
348 F.Supp.2d 673 (2004) Brandie Marie BLAKELY, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN-WESTON CENTER FOR COSMETIC SURGERY L.L.C., et al., Defendants. No. 1:04CV458. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 7, 2004. *674 Kim Michele Keenan, Karen Elizabeth Evans, Jack H. Olender & Associates PC, Washington, DC,
Halt v. Gamapublic domain
OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 Robert and Lynn Halt seek special action relief from the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees entered on remand pursuant to this Court’s memorandum decision and resulting mandate in Halt v. Sunburst Farms East, Inc., 1 CA-CV 12-0376, 2014 WL 173639 (App.2014), in favor of Sunburst Farms East, Inc., Kenneth Braden, and David Haney (collectively, “Sunburst”). As rel
Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION KIRSCH, Judge. Antonio L. Vaughn was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of dealing in cocaine, 1 each as a Class A felony, and one count of maintaining a common nuisance, 2 a Class D felony, and was sentenced to an aggre
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
State v. Watsonpublic domain
449 S.E.2d 694 (1994) 338 N.C. 168 STATE of North Carolina, v. Henry WATSON. No. 359A91. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 3, 1994. *697 Michael F. Easley, Atty. Gen. by G. Lawrence Reeves, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr. by Benjamin Sendor, Asst. Appellate Defe
State v. Jeffersonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Jefferson, 2017-Ohio-7272.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-16-1182 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201601280 v. Tanelle M. Jefferson DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
State v. Watsonpublic domain
279 S.E.2d 580 (1981) STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry R. WATSON. No. 121. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 8, 1981. *581 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Attys. Gen., Norma S. Harrell and Lucien Capone, III, Raleigh, for the State. Paul F. Herzog, Asst. Public Defender, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant.
MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs The Coalition for Equity and Excellence in Maryland Higher Education and named individuals associated with the organization (collectively,
Torri L. Sanders v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-KA-01295-SCT TORRI L. SANDERS AND SHERRY SUE JOHNSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/27/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. THOMAS J. GARDNER, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ALCORN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ROBERT SNEED LAHER LOUI
Watson v. Ohio Dept. of Dev.public domain
[Cite as Watson v. Ohio Dept. of Dev., 2025-Ohio-5877.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO YVONNE WATSON Case No. 2023-00531JD Plaintiff Judge Lisa L. Sadler Magistrate Robert Van Schoyck v. DECISION OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Defenda
State v. Watsonpublic domain
214 S.E.2d 85 (1975) 287 N.C. 147 STATE of North Carolina v. Rufus Coley WATSON, Jr. No. 65. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1975. *89 Wright T. Dixon, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Raymond L. Yasser, Raleigh, for the State. <
ACCEPTED 01-15-00254-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/27/2015 7:45:02 PM
People v. Ballpublic domain
JUSTICE COATS delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The People filed an interlocutory appeal, as authorized by section 16-12-102(2), C.R.S. (2017), and C.A.R. 4.1, from an order of the district court suppressing statements made by, and contraband seized from, Ball. Although the district court found her initial stop to be supported by reasonable articula-ble suspici
Linam v. Walmart Stores, Inc.public domain
P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH, Judge. {1 Plaintiff, Brenda Linam, appeals the decision of the district court that it has no jurisdiction to "vacate" a prior dismissal with prejudice filed by her counsel. We vacate the decision of the district court, finding that the question of the court's jurisdiction has not yet been decided. 12 In September 2011, Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant, Walmart, alleging an inju