Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brantley County Development Partners, LLC v. Brantley County, Georgia”
Board of Commissioners of Brantley County, Georgia v. Brantley County Development Partners, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 04, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0008. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BRANTLEY COUNTY, GEORGIA v. BRANTLEY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC et al. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order
Board of Commissioners of Brantley County, Georgia v. Brantley County Development Partners, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 04, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0009. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BRANTLEY COUNTY, GEORGIA v. BRANTLEY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC ET AL . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this orde
Justin Hammett v. Paulding County, Georgiapublic domain
BLACK, Circuit Judge: On October 17, 2012, police officers'Joey Horsley, Nathalie Whitener, and Joseph Mayfield, defendants-appellees in this ease, executed a search warrant at a private residence in Hiram, Georgia, intending to seize methamphetamines suspected to be in the possession of Brenda Van Cleve. During the execution of the warrant, a confrontation ensued. Each of the officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00189-CV The City of Austin, Appellant v. GHI Investments, LLC f/k/a GHI Partners, LLC, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-11-002658, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour
ACCEPTED 15-00014-cv SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 5/6/2015 4:16:29 PM Viv
On Second Application for Rehearing PER CURIAM. This Court’s no-opinion order of affir-mance of April 19, 2013, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Target Media Partners Operating Company, LLC (“Target Media”), and Specialty Marketing Corporation d/b/a Truck Market News (“Specialty Marketing”), both publishers of magazines directed to long-haul truck dri
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules August 15, 2024 In th
Stonecrest Land, LLC v. Res-Ga Scl, LLCpublic domain
Branch, Judge. In this suit on a loan agreement, including a promissory note and associated personal guaranties, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the creditor, RES-GA SCL, LLC. The debtor and a guarantor appeal; RES-GA cross-appeals. For the reasons stated below, we affirm summary judgment in favor of RES-GA but reverse the trial court’s decision not to award attorney fees in favor of RES-GA against one of
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules January 2
Fair v. CV Underground, LLCpublic domain
Branch, Judge. After Mychal Fair was shot and killed on the premises of the Underground Atlanta shopping and entertainment district, his parents Michael Fair and Elizabeth Flynn (“appellants”) brought this wrongful death action in the Superior Court of Fulton County against CV Underground, LLC, and Underground Management, LLC (collectively, “Underground”), as the occupier of the property, and IPC International Corporation, w
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
McMILLIAN, Judge. This case arises out of a boundary dispute involving a 60.85-acre tract of land (the “Tract”) with alleged boundaries once marked by hog *18wire fencing. This is the third appearance of this case in this Court, and the facts underlying the dispute are fully summarized in this Court’s opinion in the first appeal. Wright v. VIF/Valentine Farms Bldg. O
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Office of Attorney General : : v. : No. 904 C.D. 2023 : The Baroness Consulting and : Argued: April 8, 2025 Mediation, LLC and Juliane : Von Schmeling,
Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. On January 1, 2002, the Public Utilities Regulatory Act (PURA) implemented a competitive retail market for electricity in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). 1 Each incumbent, vertically integrated electric utility within the ma
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC
Opinion issued November 21, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00956-CV ——————————— STEAMBOAT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC AND JAY A. JOHNSTON, Appellants V. R.K. LOWRY, JR., L-FALLING CREEK LL
Opinion issued August 30, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00604-CV ——————————— D&R CONSTRUCTORS, INC., MICHAEL RUSHING, STEPHANIE RUSHING, PENN RUSHING, AND FLORENCE RUSHING, Appellants V. TEXAS GULF ENERGY,
ACCEPTED 14-14-00855-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/18/2015 12:34:30 PM
ACCEPTED 14-15-00295-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/3/2015 11:45:08 AM