Cases

Judgment rendered February 26, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,080-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIAN

J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jason B. Nicholas brings this civil rights action against Defendants the City of New York ("the City"), William Bratton, Stephen Davis, Eugene Whyte, and Michael DeBonis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (" Section 1983"), alleging violations of his First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (Dkt. No. 126.) Before the Court now are cross-motions for summary judgment filed b

17-2065 Edrei v. Bratton 17‐2065 Edrei v. Bratton UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: March 27, 2018 Decided: June 13, 2018) Docket No. 17‐2065

[Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. Bratton, 2024-Ohio-260.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Kimani Ware, : Relator, : No. 20AP-347 v. :

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff J.H., a Muslim woman, brought this action alleging that her rights under *405the U.S. and New York Constitutions to freely exercise her religion were violated when the New York Police Department (“NYPD”) compelled her to remove her religious headscarf during the taking o

174 Cal.App.4th 1407 (2009) HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. BRATTON et al., Defendants and Respondents; BREAK THE CYCLE et al., Interveners and Respondents. No. B209913. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. June 17, 2009. *1410 Judicial Watch, Inc., and Sterling E. Norris

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered March 18, 2011, granting respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to, inter alia, CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, which sustained certain disciplinary charges and found that respondent had just *702cause to terminate petitioner’s employment as a tenured teacher, unanimously affirmed, with

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered March 18, 2011, granting respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to, inter alia, CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, which sustained certain disciplinary charges and found that respondent had just *702cause to terminate petitioner’s employment as a tenured teacher, unanimously affirmed, with

GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] Paula Bratton and Daniel Hills Sr., individually and on behalf of their three minor children (collectively, the Brattons), appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County, Cuddy, J.) granting Halsey McDonough’s motion for judgment as a matter of law as to some of their claims and in favor of McDonough based on a jury verdict o

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In this expedited election case, we consider a challenge to George Maier’s appearance on the primary ballot for Stark County sheriff. Last year, we ousted Maier from that same office. State ex rel. Swanson v. Maier, 137 Ohio St.3d 400, 2013-Ohio-4767, 999 N.E.2d 639. After his ouster, Maier obta

654 F.Supp.2d 61 (2009) Rosezola SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of the Department of Defense, Defendants. C.A. No. 05-381 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 16, 2009. *65 Louise A. Herman, Patricia E. Andrews, Providence, RI, for Plaintiff. Ly T

498 F.Supp.2d 683 (2007) Mohammad SAIDIN, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 6974(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 27, 2007. *684 *685 Mohammad Saidin, Bronx, NY, pro se. Ivan A. Mendez, Jr., NYC Law Department, Offi

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge: Patricia Raniola was an officer in the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) for thirteen years. After receiving commendations for her early police work, the police department claims that Raniola became a frequent violator of the police disciplinary code — accumulating an extensive record of not following police procedures, failing to appear when needed in court, losing police property, not filin

243 F.3d 610 (2nd Cir. 2001) PATRICIA A. RANIOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.POLICE COMMISSIONER WILLIAM BRATTON; POLICE COMMISSIONER HOWARD SAFIR; NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RUDOLPH GIULIANI, Mayor; THE CITY OF NEW YORK; ANTHONY KISSIK, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 00-7215August Term, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: Nov

108 F.Supp.2d 167 (2000) Gary MAZZA, Plaintiff, v. William BRATTON, as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, Raymond P. Kelly, as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, Lee P. Brown, as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, The New York City Police Department and The Police Pension Fund Article II of the New York City Police Department, Defendants. No. 94 CV 50695(NG)(CLP).

OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Carmen Garcia (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action by complaint filed February 2, 2015 and amended on June 26, 2015, against defendants Edwin Quezada, Angela Arias, Rafael Pasian, Antoine Atinkpahoun, Ramon Martinez (collectively, “Individual Defendants”), and Yonkers Board of Education (‘YBOE”) (together with Individual Defendants, “

439 F.Supp.2d 1039 (2006) James C. BRATTON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. No. CV 04-7605 JVS. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 17, 2006. *1040 *1041 *1042 Sara Smith Ray, Altman & Ray, Woodland Hills, CA, for James C. Bratton.

898 F.Supp. 192 (1995) FIGHTING FINEST, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. William BRATTON, current Commissioner, New York City Police Department; Raymond KELLY, former Commissioner, New York City Police Department, Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 1060 (LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 6, 1995. *193 Kliegerman &

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge: This appeal primarily presents the issue of whether the bulletin boards of municipal police stations are limited public forums for purposes of the First Amendment. Plaintiffs-appellants Fighting Finest, Inc. (“FFI”), Carl Sehroeder, and other individuals associated with FFI appeal from the September 18, 1995, judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leona

95 F.3d 224 FIGHTING FINEST, INC.; Carl Schroeder, President; DanielO'Leary, Director; Edward Hernandez; Ray Rivera; JohnFarrell; Dave Siev; Dino Perez; Walter Doyle; DerrickHernandez; Al Valejeo; Patrick Cullen; Scott Baker;Michael Kelly; Thomas Byrne; Phil Hannah; Steve Damiani,Police Officers; John McCann; Dwight Hovington; TonyPena, Detectives, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.William BRATTON, Commission