Cases

711 F.Supp.2d 340 (2010) Harold DICE, Audrey Dice, and Dianne Dice, Plaintiffs, v. Carl JOHNSON, Brenda Marinkov, Jerry Fisch, Gregory Seltzer, and LIbby Williams, Defendants. Civil No. 1:CV-08-0956. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 3, 2010. *347 Don A. Bailey, Harrisburg, PA, Geoffrey S. McInroy, Matthew Lee

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

LCOOKS, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Brenda Dianne Morgan had a new metal roof installed on her home in June 2000. In December 2000, she noticed mold damage in her attic. She notified her homeowner’s insurance carrier, Auto Club Family Insurance Company (Auto Club). Auto Club sent an investigator to inspect the damage. In a March 24, 2003 report, the investigator concluded the mold growth was the result of

15 So.3d 465 (2009) APAC MISSISSIPPI, INC. and Jose A. Ortega, Appellants, v. Brenda K. Brown JOHNSON, Appellee. No. 2007-CA-01009-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. March 10, 2009. *468 Jennifer Miller Bermel, William O. Luckett, attorneys for appellants. David L. Merideth, Ridgeland, Philip Mansour, Greenville, attorn

YELVERTON, Judge. Brenda Tarver, a licensed real estate salesperson, sued Dianne Landers, a real estate broker, for her alleged share of the real estate commission that had been paid Landers as a result of the completed sale of a house. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Tarver, Landers appealed. We affirm. Some basic facts are undisputed. Lan-ders’ brokerage agency contracts with various licensed rea

JOHNSON, Judge. Plaintiffs in the present action are successors in interest to certain real property whose conveyance is recorded in Book 466, Page 70, Carteret County Registry. Their predecessors in interest, as well as defendants’ predecessors in interest, were involved in a similar controversy over the same tract in 1964. At that trial two issues were presented to the jury which are as follows: (1) “Are the petitioners [p

OPINION ANDERSON, Judge. Mother appeals Chancellor’s judgment terminating her parental rights. Kathy and Jason Drinnon were removed from the custody of their natural parents, Loretta Drinnon Brown and William Edward Drinnon, on April 11, 1984, because of a finding by the Hawkins County Juvenile Court that the children were “dependent and neglected.” Kathy Drinnon was placed by the Departme

PER CURIAM: * Brenda McElroy appeals a summary judgment on her claims against PHM Corporation (“PHM”) for employment discrimination under Title VII and willful violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”). Reviewing the issues de novo, we agree with the district court that McElroy failed to make out a prima facie case, so we affirm. I.

NUMBER 13-11-00331-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. ANTHONY TOBER, Appellee. On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

249 Wis.2d 706 (2002) 2002 WI 13 639 N.W.2d 537 Scott R. JENSEN, personally and as Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly and Mary E. Panzer, personally and as Minority Leader of the Wisconsin Senate, Petitioners, v. WISCONSIN ELECTIONS BOARD, an independent agency of the State of Wisconsin, Jeralyn Wendelberger, its chairman, and each of its members in his or her official capacity, David Halbrooks, R.J.

974 F.Supp. 1127 (1997) Gregory David BRYANT-BRUCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3-96-0153. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. July 3, 1997. *1128 *1129 Alfred Russell Willis, William R. Willis, Jr., Jeffrey G. Rappu

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. *1355Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in an action (Christopher) pending in the Middle District of Louisiana moves to centralize this litigation in the District of South Carolina. The litigation encompasses the 56 actions listed on Sched

821 F.Supp. 441 (1993) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Sidney E. NIBLO, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 1:92-CV-107-C, 1:92-CV-110-C and 1:92-CV-128-C. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Abilene Division. May 6, 1993. *442 *443 *444

418 F.Supp. 1169 (1976) Brenda M. MIETH and Dianne K. Rawlinson, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. E. C. DOTHARD, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Public Safety, his agents, servants, assigns, and successors in office, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 75-433-N. United States District Court, M. D. Alabama, N. D.</

120 Wn.2d 394 (1992) 842 P.2d 938 SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT NO. 7, Petitioner, v. THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, ET AL, Respondents. No. 57625-4. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. December 24, 1992. As amended by order February 4, 1993. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Richard M. Montecucco,

447 F.Supp.2d 1376 (2006) In re SEROQUEL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. MDL-1769. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. July 6, 2006. *1377 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel. <

*95ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. hPER CURIAM.* This disciplinary matter stems from two sets of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Raphael P. Poirrier, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but who is currently ineligible to practice.1

JjMICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The relator, the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans (SWBNO), seeks review of an order granting the plaintiffs’ motions to transfer twenty-eight individual actions from various divisions of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans (CDC) to Division C for consolidation with the instant case, Erin Boh v. James Industrial Contractors,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I