Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brenda Lee Paige”
Jones v. Autrypublic domain
105 F.Supp.2d 559 (2000) Brenda JONES, Plaintiff, v. Janet AUTRY and Rack Room Shoes, Inc. and John Does A and B, Defendants. No. 3:99CV898LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. June 7, 2000. David C. Dunbar, Michael Todd Bartley, Harris, Geno & Dunbar, P.S., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff. Mitzi Dease Paige, U.S. Atty's Office,
Jones v. Autrypublic domain
105 F.Supp.2d 553 (2000) Brenda JONES Plaintiff v. Janet AUTRY and Rack Room Shoes, Inc. and John Does A and B Defendants No. 3:99CV898LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. April 25, 2000. *554 David C. Dunbar, Michael Todd Bartley, Harris, Geno & Dunbar, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff. <
BARKETT, Circuit Judge: Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) appeals a final judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of Brenda Toole for injuries she suffered as a result of breast implants manufactured by Heyer-Schulte Corporation, Baxter’s predecessor corporation. In 1987, several years after receiving the implants, Ms. Toole began to experience
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM
Ardley v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. DENIED. See State v. Brigham, 694 So.2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Houser v. Churchpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGGIE B-. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), see 5 U.S.O. § 552, against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), a component of the United States Department of the Treasury.1 This matter is before the Court on Defendants
GARRETT, J. |/The defendants, Milton Crow Limited Partnership and Livingstone, LLC (collectively, “C-L”), appeal from a trial court judgment granting the plaintiff, Phillips Energy Partners, LLC (“PEP”), a right of passage across their estates and denying the defendants’ motion for new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Colleton County Council v. McConnellpublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 618 (2002) COLLETON COUNTY COUNCIL; Steven Murdaugh, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of Colleton County Council; Dr. Joseph Flowers, individually and in his official capacity as a member of Colleton County Council; Janice H. Alexander, Andrew F. Calcutt, Joseph Hamilton, Hazel Harrelson, Jas. P. Harrelson, William K. Padgett, Daisy F. Rizer, I.N. Rizer, David M. Smalls, A.L. Smoak, Jr., Kathleen V. Steedly, Wendell M.
Unzueta v. Steelepublic domain
291 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2003) Luz E. UNZUETA, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Alan Unzueta; and James S. Phillips, Jr., as Limited Conservator for Alan Jelinek, a minor child, Plaintiffs, v. Dennis STEELE; Michael H. Tudor; Philip A. Schreiber; and Bethany Smith, Defendants. No. 99-4162-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 29, 2003.
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Ducksworth v. Statepublic domain
942 P.2d 157 (1997) Ronald DUCKSWORTH, Jr. and Carl Lee Martin, Appellants, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 25415. Supreme Court of Nevada. July 15, 1997. *158 Gensler & Kuehn, Las Vegas, for Appellant Ducksworth. Sgro & Perry, Las Vegas, for Appellant Martin. *159
Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.public domain
Opinion CALLAHAN, C. J. The principal questions in this case, which comes to us upon our grant of certification1 from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (District Court); Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc., Docket No. 3:95CV958 (PCD) (D. Conn. March 31,1998); are whether, in the circumstances presented, the doctrine of parental imm
Atteberry v. Maumelle Companypublic domain
60 F.3d 415 Charles E. ATTEBERRY; Janice Atteberry; Jack L. Avery;Neta Avery; Robert W. Balentine; Pamela Kay Balentine;Glenn E. Banks; Estate of John F. Barnard, Jr., deceased;Betty Jo Barnard; John M. Bates; Susan K. Bates; SydneyF. Baustian; Lovelle Baustian; Patricia J. Beck; CloviaJ. Beck; Richard D. Berry; Joyce A. Berry; Jeff D.Blakely; Dorothy R. Blakely; Hubert H. Blanchard; JaniveS. Blanchard;
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
Household Bank v. JFS GROUPpublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiffs Michael Devine, Mark Fichtner, Siddarth Hariharan, Brandon Marshall, and Daniel Stover (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a class of all those similarly situated, allege antitrust claims against their former employers, Adobe Systems Inc. (“Adobe”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”), G
Freddie McNeill, Jr. v. Margaret Bagleypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0189p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ FREDDIE MCNEILL, JR., │ Petitioner-Appellant,
Kennedy v. St. Francis Hospitalpublic domain
225 F.Supp.2d 128 (2002) KENNEDY v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, et al. No. 3:00 CV 604(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 22, 2002. *129 *130 Francis A. Miniter, Brian D. Smith, Christine E. Corriveau, Miniter & Associates, Hartford, CT, Paul Mpande Ngobeni, E. Hartford,
Atteberry v. Maumelle Co.public domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment and dismissing a claim brought under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (the Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-20 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), and also dismissing the plaintiffs’ supplemental state law claims. We affirm. *418
Fuller v. Statepublic domain
OPINION BENAVIDES, Judge. This is a direct appeal in a capital murder ease. Late one evening in March of 1989 Appellant forced his way into the apartment of Loretta Stephens, an elderly Lame-sa woman, stole money from her bedroom while she slept, beat her with his fists, suffocated her with a pillow, and raped her dying body. He then placed Stephens’ corpse in the trunk of her own automobile, drove out of