Cases

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED LINDA M. JENKINS, November 1, 2023 Appellants Below, Petitioner EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

Cassel, J. I. INTRODUCTION In consolidated appeals, one of which involved the death penalty, Nikko A. Jenkins challenges his competency to represent himself, enter no contest pleas, proceed to sentencing, and receive the death penalty. He also makes several challenges to the death penalty. Finding no abuse of discretion by the district court and no constitutio

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2005 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 27, 2005. In The Fou

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 23, 2012 Session BRIAN DALE, single; BRIAN LAWHORN and wife, PAMELA LAWHORN; and WILLIAM JENKINS and wife, ELAINE JENKINS v. B & J ENTERPRISES, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 175314-2 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor No. E2011-01790-COA-R9-CV-FILED-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Oral Argument RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, George Melv

SUMMARY ORDER Brian Jenkins, who pleaded guilty to a one-count information charging him with the substantive crime of mail fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1341, appeals from a judgment of conviction sentencing him to 30-months’ incarceration. Jenkins challenges the calculation of his guideline range, submitting that the district court erred in refusing to reduce his base offense level as provided by Application Note 13 to U.S.S.G. § 2

ORDER George Jenkins sued two police officers and the City of Chicago under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various Illinois statutes, alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, denial of medical care, and conspiracy. After Jenkins missed a status hearing and twice refused to sit for a deposition, despite warnings that he must, the district court dismissed the suit for failure to prosecute. Jenkins appeals, contending that

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.E, Stein, Garry, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without cos

BARTLETT, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Village of Rayland ("Appellant" or "the Village"), appeals the judgment entry of the Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for summary judgment. Appellant contends that it is immune from suit on the counterclaim filed by Appellees, Gordon M. Jenkins and Andrea Jenkins, on the basis of sovereign immunity. For the following reasons, the j

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.E, Stein, Garry, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without cos

PER CURIAM: In this appeal, Henry C. Jenkins, defendant below (hereinafter “Petitioner”), challenges a June 28, 2010, order of the Circuit Court of Fayette County convicting him of “felony murder” and “child neglect resulting in death,” and sentencing him to life with mercy for the felony-murder conviction, and a consecutive sentence of three to fifteen years for “child neglect resulting in death.” Herein, Petitioner alleges t

Majority: CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ. Dissent: LEVY, and SILVER, JJ. CLIFFORD, J. [¶ 1] Brian Addy appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Jenkins, Inc. entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) on Addy’s negligence complaint in connection with injuries he sustained when he fell at Jenkins’s construction site.1 Cont

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with a number of prison disciplinary rule violations after he refused a correction officer’s directive to turn over a state-issued shirt that had

661 S.E.2d 617 (2008) JENKINS v. The STATE. No. A08A0634. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 17, 2008. Catherine M. Smith, James C. Bonner Jr., Athens, for appellant. J. David Miller, District Attorney, Brian A. McDaniel, April M. Senn, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. RUFFIN, Presiding Judge. Following a jury trial, Lonnie Jenkins wa

PER CURIAM. |,Not considered; not timely filed. See La.S.Ct. Rule X, § 5(a). Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legisla

248 F.Supp.2d 117 (2003) Brian JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. AREA COOPERATIVE EDUCATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:99CV2371(CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 10, 2003. *119 John R. Williams, Dawne Westbrook, David G. Toro, Williams & Pattis, New Haven, CT, for plaintiff. James M. Sconzo,

683 F.Supp.2d 626 (2010) Sharon JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey MARVEL, M.D., Marvel Clinic, P.C., the Center for Day Surgery, Inc., Penn Plastic Surgery of Tullahoma, P.C., Vertrue, Inc., and Acquisition Partners, Inc., f/k/a MY Choice Medical, Inc. d/b/a DoctorsSayYes.net and/or DoctorsSayYes.com, a subsidiary of Vertrue, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 4:08-cv-75. United States District Court, E.D. Tennes

ORDER OF FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, AUTHORIZING SERVICE AWARDS, AND GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES DANIEL P. JORDAN III, District Judge. On January 28, 2014, Plaintiff Leroy Jenkins and Class Counsel filed their Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement, Application for Service Awards, and Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (“Motion”), seeking Final Appro

941 A.2d 517 (2008) 178 Md. App. 156 STATE of Maryland v. Demetrius Sylvester JENKINS. No. 1315 Sept.Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 6, 2008. *518 Brian S. Kleinbord (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Juan P. Reyes (Nancy S. Forst

34 So.3d 867 (2009) JENKINS BUILDING SUPPLY, INC. v. Wanda J. McClain THIGPEN and Lionel K. Thigpen. No. 2009 CA 0903. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 23, 2009. *868 Sondra A. Cheek, Bogalusa, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee, Jenkins Building Supply, Inc. Rykert O. Toledano, Jr., Brian G. Meissner, Covingt