⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brian Kent Lewis”

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2020-10-28 · Published · cited 2× · 394 Wis. 2d 784; 951 N.W.2d 605; 2020 WI App 72
2020 WI App 72 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP2448 Complete Title of Case: BRIAN NELSON AND STACY NELSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, PAUL R. ROSENTHAL, ELENA J. ROSENTHAL, MICHAEL M. EASTON AND KARA N. EASTON, INVOLUNTARY-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 27, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 148176
Michigan Supreme Court · 2014-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 24, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 148847
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 701 F. App'x 275
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Lewis Dontars Meeks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appeal
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 10× · 79 F. Supp. 3d 394; 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1872; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1642; 2015 WL 106057
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. This is an action by Plaintiff Jane Lewis alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., by her employer, Defendant Boeh-ringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BI”). Ms. Lewis filed her
Michigan Supreme Court · 2012-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 25, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michigan Supreme Court · 2012-03-05 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 5, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143821
Michigan Supreme Court · 2013-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 1, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 146320
Michigan Supreme Court · 2014-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 24, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michigan Supreme Court · 2012-03-05 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 5, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 144049
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 28, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143664
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 28, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 142165
Michigan Supreme Court · 2012-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 20, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 145502
Washington Supreme Court · 2008-10-02 · Published · cited 22× · 193 P.3d 110
193 P.3d 110 (2008) Leo C. BRUTSCHE, Petitioner, v. CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation; and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondents. No. 79252-6. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 17, 2008. Decided October 2, 2008. *112 John Rolfing Muenster, M
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2008-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court is a motion for a preliminary injunction by plaintiff, Aza Realty Trust, Inc., against defendant, Jonathan Lewis. Aza requests a preliminary injunction preventing Lewis from trespassing on property owned by Aza and from removing vegetation from the property. For the reasons set forth in this decision, Aza's motion for a preliminary injunction is granted.
Roberts v. Doylepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2010-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 43 So. 3d 654; 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 473; 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1450; 2010 WL 3398811
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 656 Secretary of State Dawn K. Roberts appealed a judgment of the Second Circuit Court to the First District Court of Appeal, which certified to this Court that the judgment is of great public importance and requires immediate resolution by this *Page 657 Court. We have juri
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018-05-07 · Published · cited 7× · 312 F. Supp. 3d 289
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: *291Plaintiff Samantha Jansson, M.D., an anesthesiologist, commenced this civil rights action against a number of defendants, including Stamford Health, Inc. d/b/a Stamford Hospital ("Stamford Hospital") and Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C. ("SAS"). The litigation was generated by a notice of termination of
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002-12-11 · Published · cited 1× · 834 So. 2d 1180; 2002 WL 31831512
834 So.2d 1180 (2002) Denise LEWIS, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Bryan Joseph Lewis; Joanna Jones, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Brinton Jones, and Britney Jones; Avona Dorsey, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, et al. v. TRANSOCEAN TERMINAL OPERATORS, INC. No. 2002-CA-0152. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. Decem
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 24× · 392 F. Supp. 3d 1074
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Diva Limousine ("Diva"), a licensed provider of livery services in California, brings this putative class action on behalf of providers of pre-arranged ground transportation services against Uber Technologies and its subsidiaries ("Uber"). Diva alleges that Uber secures unlawful cost savings by misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. In doing
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00005CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 10:02:33 AM