Cases

LYNN, J. This case arises out of the interim suspension of the respondent, John F. Gallant, from the practice of law. A Judicial Referee ( Duggan , J.) recommended that the suspension remain in effect. We agree with the referee's recommendation. I The respondent's interim suspension stems from his August 2017 indictment for

354 B.R. 583 (2006) In re Thomas NEAL and Peggy A. Neal, Debtors. Thomas Neal and Peggy A. Neal, Plaintiffs v. New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance Foundation, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-13400-MWV, Adversary No. 05-1183-MWV. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire. November 28, 2006. *584

251 B.R. 446 (2000) In re Amos E. COX, Debtor. No. 99-23397. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York. August 7, 2000. Kenneth Gallant, Rochester, NY, for debtor. Brian B. Kumiega, Marvin R. Baum, P.C., Buffalo, NY, for secured creditor. DECISION & ORDER JOHN C. NINFO, II, Chief Judge. BACKGROUND On Nove

523 F.Supp.2d 602 (2007) Freddie WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Kenneth Burnley, Lavonne Sheffield, and John Does I and II, Defendants. Nos. 04-71064, 04-71841. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 30, 2007. *603 *604 Benjamin Whitfi

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The defendant insurance company, Admiral, issued a liability insurance policy that provided a $1 million ceiling on coverage for a single occurrence (that is, an event that would trigger coverage). While the policy was in effect, Brian Budrik, a worker at a construction site managed by Wegman Construction Company, was injured in a fall and sued Wegman (an “additional insured” on the policy, which had b

206 B.R. 8 (1997) In re WILD BILLS, INC., Debtor. Richard BELFORD, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. UNION TRUST COMPANY, Brian Goldwitz and David Goldwitz, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-50725, Adv. Pro. No. 94-5099. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. March 4, 1997. *9 *10 John R. Scanlo

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00109-CV ___________________________ JULIETTE GALLANT, Appellant V. CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, KELLER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DISTRICT, TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT,

On January 30, 2017, the plaintiff, Brian Lewis, filed a complaint alleging that, nearly three years earlier, he slipped and fell on ice that had accumulated in a parking lot owned by the defendant, Rocco Realty Trust (trust). Lewis claimed that the trust caused the fall because it negligently failed to inspect and maintain the property. The trust filed an answer asserting, among other defenses, that the complaint should be dismissed because Lewis failed to

35 F.Supp.2d 378 (1998) Paul GALLANT, Wrebbit Toys and Games Mfrs. Inc. and 2798140 Canada, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TELEBRANDS CORP., Telebrands Advertising Corp. and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 94-452(AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 22, 1998. *379 *

CLIFFORD, J. [¶ 1] Francoise G. Gallant appeals from a judgment of conviction for murder, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) (1983 & Supp.2002),1 entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Delahanty, J.) following a jury trial. Gallant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that because he was heavily intoxicated and was suffering from an abnormal condition of the min

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) CDM Constructors, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 60454, 60455, 60669 ) Under Contract No. W9 l 2PL- l 2-C-0022 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Bret S. Wacker, Esq. Jeffrey M. Gallant, Esq.

OPINION COMPTON, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Soon after their daughter Catherine’s divorce, Carl and Betty Clark1 took legal custody of Catherine’s two sons because of her drug addiction. That was three years ago. Roberto B., the boys’ father, now wants custody. He appeals the superior court’s denial without a hearing of his motion to modif

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Nena Rodriguez, the claimant, appeals from summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services affirming the Secretary’s denial of Rodriguez’ application for Supplemental Security Income. We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) & 1383(c)(3). We reverse the decision of the district court and award benefits, because the Secr

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John S. Stritzinger seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to reopen his ease. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 4, 2023 Decided March 1, 2024 No. 22-5300 JASON LEOPOLD AND BUZZFEED, INC., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:19-c

581 F.3d 1350 (2009) 1ST HOME LIQUIDATING TRUST, Roger P. Kavanagh, Jr., Everette E. Mills, III, and William E. Stone, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, and Joseph M. Bryan, Jr., George E. Carr, Jr., Joann Davis, Gene Dematteo, Jr., Ms. Allan C. Hollan, Estate of Joan S. Hilson (c/o Sonhil Associates, c/o John S. Pyne), James B. Millikan, Thomas G. Nisbet, Jr., Jule C. Spach, Louis C. Stephens, Jr., Mary Adams Stephens, M. Willard Tucker, Sit Investment A

Rubin, J. The plaintiff, James T. Lichoulas, Jr. (plaintiff), commenced this action in the Land Court challenging the validity of the city of Lowell’s eminent domain taking of the plaintiff’s dormant hydroelectric power plant. The Land Court dismissed the complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff has appealed. 1. Background. In 1986, the plaintiff was licensed by the Federal En

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Urban Health Care Coalition and fifteen hospitals, medical centers, and health systems (referred to collectively as “the Hospitals”) have sued the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services 1 seeking to enj

MEMORANDUM ** Roy Nelson’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act was denied at all levels of the administrative process and by the district court. We affirm the denial. In evaluating the medical evidence, the ALJ was not required to discuss every treatment note. Vincent v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1393, 1394-95 (9th Cir.1984).

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) CDM Constructors Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62026, 62088, 62089 ) Under Contract No. W912PL-12-C-0022 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Bret S. Wacker, Esq. Emily J. Baldwin, Esq.