Cases

ORDER DENYING FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge On August 9, 2016, Facebook filed a motion to dismiss Brickman’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). ECF No. 50. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1, Facebook also filed a Notice of Constitutional Question to the Attorney General of the United States. ECF No. 51. And pursuant to Fed. R. Ci

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS Re: ECF No. 36 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Face-book, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procédure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 36. Plaintiff Christine Holt has filed an opposition. ECF No. 39. The Court will grant the motion in part an

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COLIN R. BRICKMAN, individually No. 21-16785 and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, D.C. No. 3:16- cv-00751-WHO Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellee, META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant-App

I. INTRODUCTION On July 6, 2017, plaintiff Steve Gallion filed this putative class action against defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Spectrum Management Holding Company, LLC, and Does 1-10 alleging violations of the Telephone and Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Dkt. 1 ("Compl."). Pl

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiffs Robert Herskowitz (“Herskowitz”) and Phoebe Juel (“Juel”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action lawsuit against Apple Inc. (“Apple”), alleging that Apple routinely and unlawfully charges its “e-Store” customers more than once for the same products and services in violation of the consumer agreements governing

ORDER Leigh Martin May, United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Stay [22]. After due consideration, the Court enters the following Order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Grace Sessions alleges that Defendant used an automatic telephone dialing system without th

Alan B. Johnson, United States District Judge The parties brought this matter before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Victory Processing, LLC and Dave Dishaw (collectively referred *1266to as Victory Processing) filed Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56(a) (Victory Processing's

[Cite as State v. Ray, 2025-Ohio-2023.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee :

22-1726-cv Soliman v. Subway Franchisee Advert. Fund Tr., Ltd. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Submitted: October 24, 2023 Decided: May 10, 2024) Docket No. 22-1726-cv MARINA SOLIMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge On May 12, 2016, the American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., the Democratic Party of Oregon, Inc., Public Policy Polling, LLC, the Tea Party Forward PAC, and the Washington State Democratic Central Committee (collectively, "plaintiffs") sued United States Attorney General Loretta Lynch in her official capacity and the Federal Communications Commission ("the FCC") (c

CHARLES C. LOVELL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. Having examined the entire record, the Court is prepared to rule. I. BACKGROUND This is a declaratory judgment action claiming violation of Plaintiffs' civil rights, 42 U

[Cite as State v. Woodard, 2022-Ohio-3081.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 29110 : v.

*1135ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge Plaintiff David Greenley commenced this class action1 lawsuit against Defendant Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA) seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Telepho

ORDER & MEMORANDUM FINDING BILLBOARD ACT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL, CONTENT-BASED REGULATION OF SPEECH JON P. McCALLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE This action concerns alleged First Amendment violations that occurred when agents of the State of Tennessee (“the State”) sought to remove Plaintiff William H. Thomas’s noncommercial billboard pursuant to the Billboard Regulation and Control Act of 1972 (“