Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of No. 22-15815 himself and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 06269-PJH v. OPINION SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the U

267 F.Supp. 600 (1967) Sam BRISKIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Louis J. GLICKMAN et al., Defendants. No. 66 Civ. 4301. United States District Court S. D. New York. April 12, 1967. *601 Schwartz & Frank, New York City, for plaintiffs; George H. Schwartz, Harvey M. Sklaver, Paul E. Gelbard, and Frederick Schwartzman, New York City,

RIMM, J.T.C. This is a local property tax assessment matter involving a condominium unit in the Warwick, located at Raleigh Avenue and the Boardwalk. The subject property is unit 334 and is designated as Block BCX20, Lot 80 in defendant’s tax records. For the tax year 1982 the property was assessed as follows: Land $ 22,200 Improvements 22,200

MEMORANDUM PAPPERT, District Judge. In April of 1986 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), holding that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits prosecutors from challenging potential jurors based on their race. Id. at 89, 106 S.Ct. 1712. Prior to Batson, the Court’s opinion

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: A group of former shareholders of a closely held furniture company (Sloane) 1 sued officers and agents of Beck Industries, Inc., and Beck’s accounting firm, for damages arising out of losses sustained by Sloane shareholders following the acquisition

398 F.Supp. 997 (1975) Judith Wilder BRISKIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. ERNST & ERNST, a Co-Partnership, Defendants. Judith Wilder BRISKIN et al., as listed above in Case No. 73-1345-AAH, Plaintiffs, v. Newton GLEKEL et al., Defendants. Newton GLEKEL et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant. Nos. 73-1345-AAH, 73-1346-AAH.

CRABTREE, J.T.C. This is a consolidated group of local property tax cases wherein 72 condominium owners seek review of judgments of the Passaic County Board of Taxation affirming the 1982 assessments on their units located in a high-rise complex known as Presidential Towers, 180 Lafayette Ave., Passaic, New Jersey. *410At issue are the true value of

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE McCORMICK delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from an order entered by the Circuit Court of Cook County on June 25, 1965, dismissing plaintiffs’ class actions. Defendants have filed a cross-appeal from an order overruling their motion to dismiss the individual complaints. Two separate actions were brought by plaintiffs in their own beha

EVERS, J.T.C. The issues presented in this real property tax matter are voluminous but all stem from the claim of Berkley Arms Apartment Corp., a cooperative corporation, (hereafter taxpayer) that its mid-rise apartment structure was over-assessed in 1982 by the City of Hackensack, (hereafter city). Also raised were issues concerning discrimination in the assessment, taxpayer’s rights of equal protection, the constitutionali

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

CRABTREE, J.T.C. This is a local property tax case wherein plaintiff seeks review of judgments of the Essex County Board of Taxation affirming the 1985 assessments on plaintiff’s property located on the southeast corner of Ridge Road and Bradford Avenue in defendant municipality. The subject of this proceeding is 16 separately assessed condominium units acquired by plaintiff on or about March 22,1985. Of the 16 units so purcha

701 F.2d 948 226 U.S.App.D.C. 212 John DOE, et al.v.DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants. No. 80-2171. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 23, 1981.Opinion Jan. 11, 1983.Separate Statements Jan. 28, 1983. Appeal from the United State

507 F.Supp. 1128 (1980) Michael R. WOOD, individually, and dba National Photo Services, Plaintiff, v. SANTA BARBARA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC. et al., Defendants. Civ. No. LV 79-1 RDF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. December 15, 1980. *1129 *1130 *1131

727 F.2d 873 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,707Peter MOSESIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., et al., Defendants-Appellees,Charles L. FLETCHER and Milton Fredman, as Co-Trustees ofRoyal Inns of America, Inc., a Californiacorporation, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., a partnership, and EarlGagosian, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 83-5638, 8

359 F.2d 859 Application of Hans HILMER, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter Aumuller. Patent Appeal No. 7482. United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. April 28, 1966. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1966. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Eugene O. Retter, John Kekich, Kalamazoo, Mich., George E. Frost, Chicago,

315 F.2d 210 In the Matter of GIBRALTOR AMUSEMENTS LTD., Bankrupt.National Bank of Westchester, White Plains, Appellant,The Wurlitzer Company, Wurlitzer Acceptance Corporation and M. Hallsted Christ, Appellees. No. 210. Docket 27820. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued January 17, 1963. Decided March

727 F.Supp. 98 (1989) David H. GELFAND, as executor of the estate of Sidney Gelfand, and Wallace Musoff, Plaintiffs, v. Andrew L. STONE, Defendant. No. 88 Civ. 5790(PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 17, 1989. *99 Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City (Blair Axel, Mitchell B. Briskin, of cou

Kirby v Lett (2022 NY Slip Op 05159) Kirby v Lett 2022 NY Slip Op 05159 Decided on September 14, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

*225KEETON, Justice. Respondent, J. E. Tarr, Jr., plaintiff in the trial court, will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff. Appellants will be hereinafter referred to as defendants. After a trial on issues joined, by a decree dated November 19, 1951, the Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, Divisio

NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v 70 Orchard LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 09004) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v 70 Orchard LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 09004 <