Cases

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child. The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Miguel HH., 285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

ROGER A. PAGE, JUSTICE The primary issue in this appeal is whether a surviving spouse maintains priority to file a wrongful death action when the decedent's child has also filed a wrongful death action in which the child alleges that the surviving spouse negligently caused the decedent's death. The trial court dismissed the daughter's wrongful death complaint, but the Court of Appeals

[J-31-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 813 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Order entered on : December 29, 2

M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, United States District Court Judge *1237THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Environmental Restoration, LLC's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Doc. 1] and Motion to Strike [Doc. 32], pertaining to the Complaint filed by the State of New Mexico; and Defendant Environmental Restoration, LLC's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Do

MARY GEIGER LEWIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *868I. INTRODUCTION This is a wrongful death case. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending before the Court are Defenda

Colleen Dolan, Judge I. Introduction Paul Corrington Fike (Husband) and Susan Fike (Wife) appeal the trial court’s second amended judgment dissolving their marriage. Husband argues the court erred and abused its discretion in determining the value of certain marital property, dividing the marital property inequitably, over-calculating his income for purp

ORDER Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) to which Plaintiff has responded in opposition (Doc. 45), and the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Facts (Doc. 51). The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and being fully advised in the premises, will now GRANT the Motion.

KIMI SEYMOUR, * NO. 2020-CA-0297 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED * DAUGHTER, BRITTANY COURT OF APPEAL SEYMOUR * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA HOUSE OF BLUES NEW ******* ORLEANS RESTAURANT CORPORATION D/B/A THE HOUSE OF BLUES NEW

10/05/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 3, 2020 IN RE LIJAH D. ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Bradley County No. V-18-181 Lawrence Howard Puckett, Judge ___

Judgment rendered May 21, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,287-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CHESAPEAKE LOUISIANA, Plainti

VAUGHN, Justice: I. INTRODUCTION The State of Delaware appeals from an order of the Superior Court that affirmed a determination by the Industrial Accident Board (the Board) that Nicholas Gates was working within the course and scope of his employment when he was injured in a motor vehicle collision. At the time of the collision, Gates was empl

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-0445 GENE C. CLAYTON JAMES, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATE

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In this matter, initiated on October 18, 2011, the Plaintiff, Serfin Amos, has alleged violations by the Defendants, McNairy County, Tennessee (the “County”) and the McNairy County Sheriffs Department (the “Sheriffs Department”),

Crew III, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dawson, J.), entered February 27, 2002 in Essex County, which, inter alia, partially granted petitioner’s application pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to file a late notice of claim. In August 2000, petitioner’s then nine-year-old daughter, Brittany G., confided that she had been touched sexually by her half brother, Anthony. In Septem

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, Employer-Below/Appellant, : C.A. N0. K18A-04-002 JJC In and for Kent County v. NICHOLAS GATES, Claimant-BeloW/Appellee. Submitted: September 17, 2018 Decided: November 16, 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Consideration of Appellant’s Appealf’om Decision of Industrial Accident Board - AFFIRMED Walt F. Schmittinger, Esquire, Schmittinger and Rodriquez, Dover, Delaware for Claimant BeloW/Appellee. John J. Klusman, Jr., Esq

Brown, Judge. *104 A jury convicted Janay Marques Brown of armed robbery, two counts of aggravated assault, two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and criminal attempt to commit armed robbery. 1 She

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2020-Ohio-4008.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-10-075 : OPINION - vs -

—Crew III, J. Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), entered November 5, 1997, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate the children of respondent David B. to be abused and/or neglected children. Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, respondent David B. (hereinafter respondent) is the biological fathe

—Crew III, J. Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), entered November 5, 1997, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate the children of respondent David B. to be abused and/or neglected children. Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, respondent David B. (hereinafter respondent) is the biological fathe

Opinion issued July 30, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00395-CR ——————————— JOSHUA WILLIAMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee