⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brook Ann Worsham”

Worsham v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017-12-13 · Published · cited 9× · 537 S.W.3d 789; 2017 Ark. App. 702
WAYMOND M'. BROWN, Judge | Appellant appeals from his conviction by jury trial of maintaining a drug premises.1 On appeal, appellant argues that (1) the circuit court erred in failing to grant his motion for a mistrial when appellee shifted the burden of proof during questioning of a witness and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for maintaining
Worsham v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019-02-06 · Published · cited 3× · 572 S.W.3d 1; 2019 Ark. App. 65
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge Appellant Landan Worsham appeals the entry of a conditional guilty plea against him on one count of sexual indecency with a child pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-14-110(a)(1) (Repl. 2013). He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss, which argued that section 5-14-110(a)(1), as applied, was overbroad and impermissibly infringed on and burdened his fundamental right t
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-10-12 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS LAURI ANN LABREE, § No. 08-16-00325-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990-03-14 · Published · cited 2× · 785 S.W.2d 249; 30 Ark. App. 251; 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 168
785 S.W.2d 249 (1990) 30 Ark.App. 251 Robert THRELKELD and Sammy Grisham d/b/a T & G Cattle Company, Appellants, v. Don WORSHAM and Mike Statler, Appellees. No. CA 89-185. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. March 14, 1990. Larry Dean Kissee, Ash Flat, W. Swain Perkins, Thayer, for appellants. J. Scott Davidson, H. David Blai
District Court, D. Arizona · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 2× · 327 F. Supp. 2d 1092; 54 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 853; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254; 2004 WL 1592651
327 F.Supp.2d 1092 (2004) Kjell HAUGLAND, Plaintiff, v. WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, et al., Defendants. No. CV 03-1418PHXMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 8, 2004. *1093 Marshall Meyers, Krohn & Moss Ltd, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff. Kerry Matthew Griggs, Patrick Gerard Rowe, Cavanagh Law Firm PA, Negatu Moll
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017-11-15 · Published · cited 2× · 2017 Ark. App. 619; 535 S.W.3d 651; 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 700
DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge 11 This is an adoption case. Brooke Ashley Miller is the biological mother of B.A.M., who was approximately four years old at the time of the adoption. Kerry Coleman is purportedly the child’s biological father. 1 The adoptive parents are Jason and Manesseh Moor
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-09-24 · Published · cited 0×
09/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2018 200 LINDEN AVENUE PROPERTIES, G.P., ET AL. v. CHEYENNE JOHNSON, SHELBY COUNTY ASSESSOR OF PROPERTY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-001737-14 Jerry Stokes, Judge
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2019-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00010-CR PEDRO WALTER GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-04804-2 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00039-CR James FERNANDEZ, Appellant v. The The STATE of Texa
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 640 S.W.3d 704; 2022 Ark. App. 59
Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 59 2023.08.22 11:21:09 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS -05'00' DIVISION I 2023.003.2026 No. CV-19-686 9 ELAINE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTOR, Opinion Delivered February 9, 2022 INC., AND QINGDAO XIYINGMEN DOUBLE CAMEL TYRE CO., LTD. APPELLANTS/CROSS
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-03-08 · Published · cited 101× · 634 F.3d 1296; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4596; 2011 WL 780684
634 F.3d 1296 (2011) Linda WOLICKI-GABLES, Robert Gables, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC., Codman & Shurtleff, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Greg Nelson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-14342. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 8, 2011. *1297 T. Patton Youngblood, Jr., T. Patt
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
01/31/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 15, 2019 Session HUTTON TEAM, LLC v. INGLES MARKETS, INCORPORATED ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Greene County No. 2017-CV-251 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor ___________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2014-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 18, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00627-CR DEON REESE EVANS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Cour
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002-10-09 · Published · cited 15× · 572 S.E.2d 342; 257 Ga. App. 787; 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3022; 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1325
572 S.E.2d 342 (2002) 257 Ga. App. 787 CLARK v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Simpson et al. v. Clark. Nos. A02A1014, A02A1015. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 9, 2002. Certiorari Denied January 27, 2003. *344 Kent, Sigman & Bogle, A. Martin Kent, Eugene C. Brooks IV, S
Frison v. Mathispublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009-10-01 · Published · cited 8× · 981 A.2d 57; 188 Md. App. 97; 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 159
981 A.2d 57 (2009) 188 Md. App. 97 E. Scott FRISON, Jr. v. Jerry J. MATHIS. No. 2967, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 1, 2009. E. Scott Frison, Jr., Bowie, for Appellant. Timothy F. Maloney (Koushik Bhattacharya, Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA, on brief), Greenbelt, for Appellee. Panel: HOL
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2021-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-19-00268-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOANNA GUIJARRO, Appellant, v. CHARLES P. JOHNSON, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHARLES JOHNSON FINANCE; CHARLES JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY; MARILYN JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY; AND LOANTEC SOFTWARE, INC.,
Skelton v. Camppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-12-12 · Published · cited 37× · 234 F.3d 292; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31516; 2000 WL 1741662
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Certain municipal officials appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment in this action brought for alleged violations of statutory and constitutional rights. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. I. Paul Skelton was elected mayor of
Fernandez, Jamespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-03-02 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0123-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/2/2015 11:47:52 AM Accepted 3/2/2015 2:26:18 PM
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995-02-15 · Published · cited 102× · 901 S.W.2d 382; 1995 Tenn. App. LEXIS 92
OPINION CANTRELL, Judge. The Chancery Court of Coffee County granted summary judgment to the City of Tullahoma, its Industrial Development Board, and its Board of Public Utilities declaring void the appellant’s “allodium title” laying claim to the Tullahoma Industrial Park. In addition the court enjoined the appellant from asserting any further claim to the property and assessed fees and costs
Texas Supreme Court · 2008-10-17 · Published · cited 152× · 269 S.W.3d 588; 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 29; 2008 Tex. LEXIS 975; 2008 WL 4605951
Justice WALDROP1 delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice HECHT, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, and Justice WILLETT joined. This case involves a claim for specific performance of a real estate purchase contract. After a trial in which the jury found that the seller breached the contract, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the