Cases

PITMAN, J. | ] Plaintiffs, 88 former employees of Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport (“LSUHSC-S”), and Defendant, the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College (“LSU”),1 appeal the judgment of the trial court finding that Plaintiffs are entitled to payment for annual leave balances in excess of 300 hours, penalties an

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Connolly v. State, 172 So.3d 893, 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (en banc) ("Use or possession of a firearm, however, is not an essential element of second degree murder, but rather, it may serve to allow for a reclassification of the second degree murder from a first degree felony

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED . Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Connolly v. State, 172 So.3d 893, 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (en banc) ("Use or possession of a firearm, however, is not an essential element of second degree murder, but rather, it may serve to allow for a reclassification of the second degree murder from a first degree felony

Per Curiam. AFFIRMED . Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

LAGOA, Associate Judge. Joseph Smith ("Smith") appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly concedes, the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury

LAGOA, Associate Judge. Joseph Smith ("Smith") appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly concedes, the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury

PER CURIAM. As Lashay Smith argues and the State concedes, the trial court's amended order of revocation of Smith's probation still deviates from the court's oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing concerning the conditions of probation that it found Smith to have violated. Accordingly, although we affirm the revocation of Smith's probation, we remand for the entry of a second amended order of revocation that fully conforms to

PER CURIAM. As Lashay Smith argues and the State concedes, the trial court's amended order of revocation of Smith's probation still deviates from the court's oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing concerning the conditions of probation that it found Smith to have violated. Accordingly, although we affirm the revocation of Smith's probation, we remand for the entry of a second amended order of revocation that fully conforms to

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-21-00216-CR ASHLEY JUDSON WHITE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 20-01780-CRF-85

NO. 12-23-00123-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BRANDON ASHLEY BACON, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

In Division In the Estate of Richard E. Smith, ) ) APRIL M. SVEC, Personal Representative of ) the Estate of Deidre A. Smith, and ) ASHLEY A. LUX, ) ) Appellants, ) No. SD37438

Cite as 2021 Ark. 89 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-11-613 Opinion Delivered: April 22, 2021 DANNY LEE ASHLEY PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST PETITIONER JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL V. COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge 11 This is an adoption case. Brooke Ashley Miller is the biological mother of B.A.M., who was approximately four years old at the time of the adoption. Kerry Coleman is purportedly the child’s biological father. 1 The adoptive parents are Jason and Manesseh Moor

827 F.Supp. 1223 (1993) ASHLEY PARK CHARLOTTE ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant, Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A. f/k/a Sovaran Bank, N.A., and Bessemer Improvement Company, Interested Parties. No. C-C-90-395-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. June 8, 1993. *12

People v Smith (2021 NY Slip Op 04887) People v Smith 2021 NY Slip Op 04887 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. ________________ No. 3D18-0991 Lower Tribunal No. 17-16780 ________________ Joseph Smith, Appellant, vs.

HUNSTEIN, Justice. Appellant John Lombard Smith was convicted of murder and related offenses in connection with the August 2005 shooting death of Betty Gaines. Smith now appeals, alleging evidentiary error and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 1 Viewed

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v