Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brooke v. Patel”
Patel v. Martinpublic domain
GANTS, C.J. **30 The primary issue on appeal is whether a party in a civil case has the right to an immediate appeal from a discovery order under the doctrine of present execution. The defendants here argue that, after the motion judge ordered the disclosure of communications that they contend
Patel v. Ricepublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Finding no error of fact or law, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limi
United States v. Patelpublic domain
370 F.3d 108 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Umesh PATEL, Defendant, Appellant. No. 02-2516. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 2, 2004. Decided May 27, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Douglas S. Brooks, with whom Thomas M. Hoopes and Kelly, Libby & Hoopes, P.C. were on b
Patel v. Patelpublic domain
[Cite as Patel v. Patel, 2014-Ohio-2150.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Aavaben K. Patel, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-976 v. : (C.P.C. No. 13DR-02-511) Bkamikkumar J. Patel, : (
Harmon v. Patelpublic domain
617 N.E.2d 183 (1993) 247 Ill. App.3d 32 186 Ill.Dec. 944 Frances HARMON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jashbhai PATEL, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-91-3329. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. May 10, 1993. *184 Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago (William C. A
Bhavanaben Dineshkumar Patel v. Pamela Bondipublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0053p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BHAVANABEN DINESHKUMAR PATEL; DINESHKUMAR │ MADHAVLAL PATEL; ILEN P
Muskegan Hotels, LLC v. Hiren Patelpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1475 MUSKEGAN HOTELS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HIREN PATEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Muskegan Hotels, LLC v. Hiren Patelpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1475 MUSKEGAN HOTELS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HIREN PATEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
State v. Patelpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Patel, 2013-Ohio-3300.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.
NO. 07-03-0357-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 7, 2004 ______________________________ NAVIN PATEL AND SE
Shriya Biman Patel v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00238-CR 4417774 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
NO. 07-03-0357-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 7, 2004 ______________________________ NAVIN PATEL AND SEJAL PATEL, APPELLANT
NO. 07-03-0357-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 7, 2004 ______________________________ NAVIN PATEL AND SEJAL PATEL, APPELLANT V.
State v. Patelpublic domain
949 A.2d 401 (2008) STATE v. Tajendra PATEL. No. 2003-341-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 20, 2008. *404 Jane McSoley, Esq., Providence, for Plaintiff. Kevin Bristow, Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. OPINION Just
In re Marriage of Patelpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court In re Marriage of Patel, 2013 IL App (1st) 112571 Appellate Court In re MARRIAGE OF SUNIL A. PATEL, Petitioner-Appellee, and AMY Caption E. SINES-PATEL, Respondent-Appellant. District & No. First District, Sixth Division Docket No. 1-11-2571 Filed
Patel v. Brookspublic domain
929 N.E.2d 166 (2006) 367 Ill. App.3d 1087 PATEL v. BROOKS. No. 1-05-3552. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District September 22, 2006. Rev'd in pt., vac. in pt.
Patel v. Statepublic domain
Thompson, Justice. Viral Patel was convicted of felony murder in connection with the shooting death of Tyree Garrett. He appeals, asserting, inter alia, the trial court erred by admitting into evidence a hearsay statement that his wife made to his brother at or near the time of the shooting.1 Finding no error, we affirm. *404
Naranjibhai Patel v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN join, dissenting: The majority opinion is wrong in two .different ways. First, it ignores the facial nature of Plaintiffs’ challenge to the ordinance and the very high bar that must be overcome for a facial challenge to succeed. Second, it fails to establish that a search of records under the ordinanc
Kothari v. Patelpublic domain
585 S.E.2d 97 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 168 KOTHARI v. PATEL. Patel et al. v. Patel. Nos. A03A0286, A03A0287. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 17, 2003. Reconsideration Denied July 8, 2003. Certiorari Denied November 10, 2003. *99 Cohen, Cooper & Estep, Steven J
Patel v. Heidelbergerpublic domain
ORDER In June 2000 Arvind Patel, an inmate at the Centraba Correctional Center, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the lawyer who represented his ex-wife in their divorce. The district court dismissed Patel’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failing to state a claim under § 1983 and because the court lacked jurisdiction to hear his state-law complaints regarding his divorce proceed