Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As

641 F.Supp.2d 834 (2009) 3M COMPANY, and 3M Innovative Properties Company, Plaintiffs, v. MOLDEX-METRIC, INC., Defendant. Civil File No. 03-5292 (MJD/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 10, 2009. *837 Juanita R. Brooks, John C. Adkisson and Sara Cotton, Fish & Richardson P.C. and Hildy Bowbeer and Karl G. H

746 F.Supp.2d 1216 (2010) EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Solutia, Inc., and Fire Ram International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 3:09cv361/MCR/MD. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. September 29, 2010. *1217 James Martin Corrigan, James M

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1709 STATE OF MAINE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff 3M Company (“3M”) has sued Defendants Lanny J. Davis, Lanny J. Davis & Associates, PLLC, Davis-Block LLC (collectively the “Davis Defendants”), and Harvey Boulter, Porton Capital Technology Funds, Porton Capital, Inc. (collectively the “Porton Defendants”) for a number of claim

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court John A. Tibbs and Margaret B. Tibbs, Respondents, v. 3M Company; 4520 Corp., Inc.; A.O. Smith Corporation; A. W. Chesterton Company; ABB Inc.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation; AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp.; Amentum Environment & Energy, Inc.; Anchor/Darling Valve Company; Armstrong International, Inc.; Asbestos Corporation Limited ASCO, L.P.; Atlas Asbestos Co.; Atlas Turner, Inc.; AWT Air Company, Inc.; Bahnson, Inc.; Banner I

361 F.Supp.2d 958 (2005) 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY and Dyneon LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. DUPONT DOW ELASTOMERS LLC, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. No. CIV. 03-3364MJDJGL. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 8, 2005. *959 *960

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0424p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - NIC

R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the

324 F.3d 141 LEPAGE'S INCORPORATED; LePage's Management Company, L.L.C., Appellees/Cross-Appellantsv.3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY); Kroll Associates, Inc. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 00-1368. No. 00-1473. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued July 12, 2001.

SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS, C. J., SILER, BATCHELDER, GILMAN, GIBBONS, ROGERS, COOK, McKEAGUE, and GRIFFIN, JJ., joined. MARTIN, J. (pp. 459-70), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which DAUGHTREY, COLE, and CLAY, JJ., joined. *447OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Between 1987 and 2001, Nic

277 F.3d 365 (3rd Cir. 2002) LEPAGE'S INCORPORATED; LEPAGE'S MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTSv.3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY); KROLL ASSOCIATES, INC. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLANT Nos. 00-1368 and 00-1473 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued July 12, 2001January 14, 2002

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE State of New Hampshire v. Civil No. 22-cv-145-LM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 032 P 3M Company, et al. ORDER In late May 2019, the State of New Hampshire filed this parens patriae1 suit in state court against 3M Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, and T

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION JAMES BLAIR, as Administrator of ) the Estate of WALTER H. GODFREY, ) JR., deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N14C-03-079 ASB v. ) ) CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants.

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Brad Lee Herold, as Executor of the : Estate of William L. Herold : : v. : No. 998 C.D. 2021 : Argued: June 23, 2022 University of Pittsburgh - of : Commonwealth System of Higher : Education and 3M Company; Abb : Motors and Mechanical, Inc. f/k/a :

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021

TERRY, Associate Judge: This case arose from a traffic accident in which Brooks’ car collided with Atherton’s car on an icy street. Because Brooks was not insured, Atherton’s insurance carrier was obliged to reimburse Atherton for the damage to his car under an uninsured motorist clause in his policy. Atherton refused, however, to accept his carrier’s proffered payment. He then brought an action based on allegations of negli

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01005-SCT E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. GLEN STRONG AND CONNIE STRONG DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOHN G. CORLEW DEBORAH DEROCHE KUCHLER