Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLC”
Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCpublic domain
SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court are Defendant Firestone Polymers, LLC’s (“Firestone”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# s 59-66). Having considered the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court finds that Firestone’s motions should be granted in part and denied in part.
Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Wallace v. Performance Contractorspublic domain
Case: 21-30482 Document: 00516595769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 3, 20
Martin v. Am. Midstream Partners, LPpublic domain
SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant P3 Global Personnel, LLC's motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 The Court grants the motion because plaintiffs' complaint does not allege facts that entitle them to relief. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Percy and Linda Martin bring this acti
Bridges v. Gaten's Adventures Unlimited, L.L.C.public domain
CRAIN, J. Ijn this workers’ compensation proceeding, the employer, Gaten’s Adventures Unlimited, L.L.C., appeals a judgment in favor of the employee, Julia Bridges. At issue on appeal is whether the evidence sufficiently established the following: (1) Bridges was in an accident that caused injuries covered by the workers’ compensation act, (2) Bridges was temporarily totally disabled for several weeks after the accident, (
Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for a racially discriminatory termination of employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § Í981, are Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx’s”) motion for summary judgment (instrument #22) and Plaintiff Roddie Morgan’s (“Morgan’s”) oppose
Davis v. State of New York Department of Correctionspublic domain
OPINION & ORDER Seibel, U.S.D.J. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 Plaintiff Melvin Davis, an African-American man, has been employed by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DO
Croley v. JDM Servs., L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Croley v. JDM Servs., L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-4762.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jhalil Croley, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-544 (C.P.C. No. 20CV-6746) v. :
In Re Rhodia S.A. Securities Litigationpublic domain
531 F.Supp.2d 527 (2007) In re RHODIA. S.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Securities Actions. MDL No. 1714. Civil Action No. 1:05 Civ. 5389(DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 26, 2007. *528 *529 Gary Steven Graifman, Kantrowitz Goldhamer & G
Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. Kerkhoffpublic domain
504 F.Supp.2d 464 (2007) Heidi BROWN, and Heidi Brown as Parent and Next Friend of Trevor Rhiner, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Paul KERKHOFF; Kerkhoff Chiropractic; The Masters Circle; Dr. Larry Markson; Dr. Bob Hoffman; Dr. Dennis Perman; and John Does, Defendants. No. 4:06-cv-00342-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.</
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS