⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLC”

District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 21× · 70 F. Supp. 3d 816; 2014 WL 5088657
SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court are Defendant Firestone Polymers, LLC’s (“Firestone”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# s 59-66). Having considered the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court finds that Firestone’s motions should be granted in part and denied in part.
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-08-16 · Published · cited 13× · 317 F.R.D. 169; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 438; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108492; 2016 WL 4489936
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-01-03 · Published · cited 28× · 57 F.4th 209
Case: 21-30482 Document: 00516595769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 3, 20
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019-05-15 · Published · cited 18× · 386 F. Supp. 3d 733
SARAH S. VANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant P3 Global Personnel, LLC's motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 The Court grants the motion because plaintiffs' complaint does not allege facts that entitle them to relief. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Percy and Linda Martin bring this acti
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 8× · 167 So. 3d 992; 2014 La.App. 1 Cir. 1132; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 658; 2015 WL 1517066
CRAIN, J. Ijn this workers’ compensation proceeding, the employer, Gaten’s Adventures Unlimited, L.L.C., appeals a judgment in favor of the employee, Julia Bridges. At issue on appeal is whether the evidence sufficiently established the following: (1) Bridges was in an accident that caused injuries covered by the workers’ compensation act, (2) Bridges was temporarily totally disabled for several weeks after the accident, (
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-07-10 · Published · cited 70× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 434; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89928; 2015 WL 4187673
OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for a racially discriminatory termination of employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § Í981, are Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx’s”) motion for summary judgment (instrument #22) and Plaintiff Roddie Morgan’s (“Morgan’s”) oppose
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-06-13 · Published · cited 8× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 343
OPINION & ORDER Seibel, U.S.D.J. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 Plaintiff Melvin Davis, an African-American man, has been employed by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DO
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-10-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 Ohio 4762
[Cite as Croley v. JDM Servs., L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-4762.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jhalil Croley, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 23AP-544 (C.P.C. No. 20CV-6746) v. :
District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-09-26 · Published · cited 10× · 531 F. Supp. 2d 527; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72758; 2007 WL 2826651
531 F.Supp.2d 527 (2007) In re RHODIA. S.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All Securities Actions. MDL No. 1714. Civil Action No. 1:05 Civ. 5389(DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 26, 2007. *528 *529 Gary Steven Graifman, Kantrowitz Goldhamer & G
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007-08-23 · Published · cited 27× · 504 F. Supp. 2d 464; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62458; 2007 WL 2481422
504 F.Supp.2d 464 (2007) Heidi BROWN, and Heidi Brown as Parent and Next Friend of Trevor Rhiner, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Paul KERKHOFF; Kerkhoff Chiropractic; The Masters Circle; Dr. Larry Markson; Dr. Bob Hoffman; Dr. Dennis Perman; and John Does, Defendants. No. 4:06-cv-00342-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.</