⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Brown v. Frazier”

Brown v. Frazierpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 154; 190 L. Ed. 2d 112
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Ware County, denied.
Brown v. Frazierpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 852
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Brown v. Frazierpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 852
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Frazier v. Williamspublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2017-09-11 · Published · cited 5× · 2017 CO 85; 401 P.3d 541
JUSTICE EID delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Ryan Frazier sought to appear on the Republican primary ballot for United States Senate. After Secretary of State Wayne Williams determined that he had gathered insufficient signatures to appear on the ballot, Frazier challenged the Secretary’s determination under § 1-1-113, C.R.S. (2017), arguing that the Secretary improperly invalidated hundreds of signature
Frazier v. Shadypublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-08-10 · Published · cited 0× · 200 So. 3d 874; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1541; 2016 WL 4204541
LOLLEY, J. This appeal arises from the First Judicial District Court, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, wherein Ruby Frazier filed a personal injury action against Craig Shady, Jr., after an automobile accident. Frazier now appeals a judgment rendered in favor of Shady. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS Around 3:51 p.m. on June 25, 2012, an automobile a
State v. Frazierpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 134 So. 3d 1255; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 468; 2014 WL 726658
LOLLEY, J. |, Martonius Frazier was charged by bill of information in August 2012 with armed robbery, a violation of La. R.S. 14:64. He subsequently pled guilty and was sentenced to 20 years at hard labor, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. After Frazier’s motion to reconsider sentence was denied, this appeal ensued. Frazier’s appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, together with a brief
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 245 So. 3d 151
WILLIAMS, J. The plaintiff, Ellen Frazier, appeals a judgment in favor of the defendants, City of Shreveport and Art Patterson. The trial court found that the plaintiff's exclusive remedy for her personal injury was a workers' compensation claim. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS Ellen Frazier and Art Patterson were employed by the City of Shreveport in the Airfield Mainte
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2012-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 847 F. Supp. 2d 952; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27454; 2012 WL 851609
ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Nathan Every, Alan Frazier, Guy Mayer, Trevor Moody, Jeffrey Nugent, and Steven Tail-man (collectively, Director Defendants)’s Motion to Dismiss [# 19], Defendants Frazier Affiliates III, L.P., Frazier Healthcare III, L.P., and Frazier Healthcare V, L.P.
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2012-08-27 · Published · cited 1× · 889 F. Supp. 2d 893; 2012 WL 3834029; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122994
ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Nathan Every, Alan Frazier, Guy Mayer, Trevor Moody, Jeffrey Nugent, and Steven Tail-man (collectively, the Directors)’s and Defendants Frazier Affiliates III, L.P., Frazier Healthcare III, L.P., and Frazier Healthcare V, L.P. (collectively, Frazier I
People v. Frazierpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2009-04-29 · Published · cited 7× · 173 Cal. App. 4th 613; 92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 794; 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 636
173 Cal.App.4th 613 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KATHY FRAZIER, Defendant and Appellant. No. C057684. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. April 29, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *614 Donald J. Horvath, under appoint
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 682 S.E.2d 8; 384 S.C. 56; 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 235
384 S.C. 56 (2009) 682 S.E.2d 8 Eliza FRAZIER and Dorothy Anderson Brailford, Respondents, v. Simon SMALLSEED; George Holmes; Eve Green; Louisa Brown; Earnestine Smalls; Virginia Anderson; Frank Green and Luther A. Green, if living, and if deceased, their heirs at law, next of kin, distributees, devisees and any persons claiming under, by or through them, also, Jane A. Hannah and Donald Hannah; Colden R. Battey, and all ot
Brown v. Frazierpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 223 Ark. 671; 267 S.W.2d 951; 1954 Ark. LEXIS 730
Ward, J. This appeal involves the construction of Ark. Stats., § 34-1421, which is to the general effect that the trial court must, in the absence of an affidavit of tender of payment of taxes, improvements, interests, etc., dismiss the complaint in certain instances. Appellees, H. W. Wells and H. L. Cooper, filed an ejectment suit against appellant, W. Cl. Bro
People v. Frazierpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2008-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 881 N.E.2d 1194; 9 N.Y.3d 1021; 852 N.Y.S.2d 8
9 N.Y.3d 1021 (2008) 881 N.E.2d 1194 852 N.Y.S.2d 8 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HECTOR FRAZIER, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided January 15, 2008. *1022 Appellate Advocates, New York City (Lynn W.L. Fahey and Reyna E. Marder o
Frazier v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 972 So. 2d 1032; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 561
PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(A). BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-07-22 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 Ohio 3209
[Cite as State ex rel. Frazier v. Schneidner, 2014-Ohio-3209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : Kesha Frazier, : Relator, : v. No. 14AP-99
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 Ohio 3252
[Cite as State ex rel. Frazier v. Schneider, 2014-Ohio-3252.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : Kesha Frazier, : Relator, : v. No. 14AP-52
Frazier v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 165 S.W.3d 527; 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 958; 2005 WL 1511151
ORDER Warren Frazier appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 203 F. App'x 851
MEMORANDUM * Luke Frazier appeals the 60-month sentence he received after pleading guilty to *852two drug charges. The district court found that Frazier had two prior state convictions that rendered him ineligible for the “safety valve” provision contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f); accordingly, although it believed the sentence to be high, the distric
Johnson v. Frazierpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001-11-15 · Published · cited 6× · 787 A.2d 433; 2001 Pa. Super. 319; 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3436
787 A.2d 433 (2001) Judith C. JOHNSON, Appellee, v. Anthony L. FRAZIER, Sr., Anthony L. Frazier, Jr., Appellants. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 30, 2001. Filed November 15, 2001. John R. Brown, Philadelphia, for appellants. *434 Leonard P. Haberman, Philadelphia, for appellee. BEFORE EAKIN, MUSMANNO, an
Frazier v. Boylepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 206 F.R.D. 480; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5778; 2002 WL 459904
DECISION AND ORDER ADELMAN, District Judge. In this diversity case plaintiff, Thomas R. Frazier, a citizen of Roseville, Minnesota, sued defendant Gerald P. Boyle, a Milwaukee lawyer, for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty arising out of Boyle’s representation of Frazier in a lawsuit against his former employer. After a trial the jury found for Frazier on the breach of fiduciary duty claim an