Cases

GREENLEE, J., FOR THE GOURT: ¶ 1. Davarrius Brown appeals pro se to this Court arguing that the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) incorrectly computed the date of his parole eligibility following sentencing for his fifth and sixth felony convictions. Finding no error, we. affirm. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

2008 MT 94N RICK BROWN, RICHARD (LARRY) ROBERTS and RANDY HILL, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DERAETHA MADISON, a.k.a. DERAETHA BROWN, Defendant and Appellee. No. DA 06-0845 Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: January 4, 2008 Decided: March 18, 2008 For Appellant: S. Charles Sprinkle, Sprinkle Law Firm, Libby, Montana. For Appellee

484 F.Supp.2d 938 (2007) Ernest A. BAGIENSKI, Plaintiff, v. MADISON COUNTY, INDIANA, John Richwine, In his official capacity, and Patricia Dillion, in her official capacity, Defendants. No. 1:05-cv-1578-SEB-JMS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 30, 2007. *939 *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-01044-COA PAUL KEENUM APPELLANT v. THE CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI AND APPELLEES FRANKIE BROWN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/18/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DALE HARKEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPEL

COLEMAN, JUSTICE, CONCURRING IN PART AND IN RESULT: ¶ 38. I concur with the majority’s analysis of today’s case with the exception that I am of the opinion that our standard of review when interpreting an existing zoning ordinance should be de novo. However, even under a de novo standard of review, I agree with the result reached by the majority, that is, that the ordinance in question doe

822 So.2d 306 (2002) Lars MADISON, Appellant, v. DeSOTO COUNTY, Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2000-CP-01155-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. February 12, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 16, 2002. Certiorari Denied August 8, 2002. *307 Lars Madison, Pro Se. James Arden Barnett Jr., Tupelo, L

517 F.3d 292 (2008) Joan ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF MADISON COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-60902. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 11, 2008. *294 Suzanne Griggins Keys (argued), Byrd & Associates, Jackson, MS, for Anderson. Holmes S. Adams (argued), John Simeon Hooks, A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2004-CA-02352-SCT TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, TOWN OF TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI, AND TUNICA COUNTY AIRPORT COMMISSION v. ANN M ATTHEWS, TRUSTEE AND JOHN PRITCHARD, JR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/30/2004 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LARRY O. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: TUNICA COUNTY SPECIAL COURT OF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CP-00059-COA ALISSIA WASHINGTON APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. STEVE S. RATCLIFF III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00588-COA TYLER CULBERSON APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. BRADLEY MILLS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APP

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CP-00538-COA FORGARY SMITH APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. BRADLEY MILLS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FO

MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen H. Davidson, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court are the following: (1) a motion to dismiss [8] filed by Defendants State of Mississippi, Mississippi Gaming Commission, Mississippi Department of Public Safety, and Robert Sharp in his official capacity (the “State Defendants”); and (2) a motion for judgment on the pleadings [17] filed by Defendant Robert Sharp (“De

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-01017-SCT JATAVIS WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/26/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES T. KITCHENS, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: AMANDA HOPE MEADOWS BENJAMIN DAVID LANG SCOTT WINSTON COLOM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

793 So.2d 601 (2001) Willie ALEXANDER and Carla Veal Alexander v. Lynell BROWN and Pamela Brown. No. 1998-CT-01727-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. August 30, 2001. *602 Wes W. Peters, Jackson, for Appellants. Davey L. Tucker, Jackson, for Appellees. EN BANC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI MI

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Madison County Mississippi Mote Co., Inc. (Madison) appeals from the jury ver-diet entered in favor of Charles Harrell, arguing that the district court erred in instructing the jury. Because we conclude that the instructions- did not fairly and adequately submit the case to the jury, we reverse and remand for new trial. Harrell was

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00460-COA BILLY RAY HARRIS APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KM-00848-SCT LEE MADISON PALMER, JR. v. CITY OF OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4/22/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANDREW K. HOWORTH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETTE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID G. HILL ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-AN-00733-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE ENLARGING, EXTENDING AND DEFINING THE CORPORATE LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF CANTON, MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GLUCKSTADT, MISSISSIPPI: PECO FOODS, INC., KINGSTON PLACE, LLC, KINGSTON PLACE II, LLC, RCT, LLC, LULA B. COVINGTON, LP, AND LLM, INC. v. CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI AND RON HUTCHINSON v. GLUCKSTADT IN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-00243-SCT WENDY RYALS AND RONALD PERRY v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/18/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAVID H. STRONG, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: ALFRED L. FELDER ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: WAYNE DO

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom BEA, Circuit Judge joins, dissenting: I dissent from the majority’s opinion because the challenged laws do not survive any form of heightened scrutiny — strict or intermediate scrutiny. See D.C. v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 629 n. 27, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008) (explaining that “rational-basis scrutiny” is inappropriate for reviewing