Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brown v. Woods”
Antonacci-Brown v. Woodspublic domain
Antonacci-Brown v Woods (2019 NY Slip Op 01896) Antonacci-Brown v Woods 2019 NY Slip Op 01896 Decided on March 15, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Brown v. Woods-Skipperpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to adjudicate Petitioner’s pending filing within 90 days. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pl
Brown v. Woodspublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Lori Currier Woods, a Judge of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 12, 2010, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application to reinstate his pistol permit. Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR
Woods v. Brownpublic domain
7ermont Superior Court Filed 01/09/25 Rutland nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT Ky CIVIL DIVISION Rutland Unit
Brown v. Woodspublic domain
Ct. App. Ga. Certio-rari denied.
Wofford v. Woodspublic domain
LAURIE J. MICHELSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant a unanimous verdict. That means when there is reason to think that 11 jurors are convinced of the defendant's guilt but one is steadfastly not, the judge should either instruct the jury to continue deliberations or declare the jury hung. What the judge cannot do is remove a competent juror who is simply unpersuaded by the prosecution's
Woods v. Colvinpublic domain
*205DECISION & ORDER HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Timothy Woods (“Plaintiff’) brings this action to challenge the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) .under Title II of
WOODS v. the STATE.public domain
Brown, Judge. *158 *323 Rodney Woods appeals from his convictions of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, and possession of drug related
Woods v. Woodspublic domain
987 So.2d 339 (2008) James Madison WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Janis Lynn Thompson WOODS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 43,182-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 11, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 7, 2008. *340 James Madison Woods, In Proper Person. Franklin H. Spruiell, Jr., for Appellee.</
First National Bank v. Woods (In Re Woods)public domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Appellant First National Bank of Duran-go (“First National Bank”) appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP’s”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s confirmation of the Chapter 12 bankruptcy plan of Appellees Reson and Shaun Woods (“Debtors”). Although First National Bank raises several issues on appeal, we only reach the first: whether De
United States v. Woodspublic domain
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. James Woods and several others were indicted for participating in. a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. At trial, the government called Woods’s coconspirators. During direct and cross examination, they testified they had pleaded guilty to the conspiracy and entered a plea agreement with the government. They then went on to describe their involvem
Brown v. Woodspublic domain
300 S.W.2d 364 (1957) William Howard BROWN et ux., Appellants, v. O. D. WOODS et al., Appellees. No. 3427. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco. March 14, 1957. *365 Walker, Baker & Altaras, James & Mahanay, R. A. Kilpatrick, Cleburne, for appellants. Gean B. Turner, Cleburne, for appellees. HALE, Justice.<
JOHNSON v. BROWNpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:JOHNSON v. BROWN Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Anthony Woods v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. Indicted with two separate felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) charges, Anthony Woods entered pleas of guilty. 1 See *399 Tex. Penal Code Ann.
People v. Woodspublic domain
Opinion TURNER, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant, Vincent Woods, appeals from his convictions for cocaine possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor marijuana possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (b)). In the published portion of this opinion, we address the issue of whether, when a defendant is placed on probation pursuant to Penal Code section 1
Woods v. Google, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Re: Docket No. 73) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendant Google Ine.’s (“Google”) Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiff Rick Woods (“Woods”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. See Docket No. 73. Woods filed written oppos
W L Harper Co. v. Woodspublic domain
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 431 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-16-150 THE W L HARPER COMPANY Opinion Delivered: September 21, 2016 AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANTS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
Woods v. Statepublic domain
306 S.W.3d 905 (2010) Tarsha Delavette WOODS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 09-08-00259-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted December 29, 2009. Decided February 17, 2010. *906 Tom Brown, Livingston, for appellant. William Lee Hon, Crim. Dist. Atty., Kaycee Jones, Asst. Crim.
Woods v. Hortonpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 660 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 661 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
People v. Woodspublic domain
74 Cal.Rptr.3d 786 (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1045 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kendricks R. WOODS, Defendant and Appellant. No. A116399. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One. April 7, 2008. As Modified April 14, 2008. *787 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney Gene