Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Brunson v. Taylor”
Brunson v. Taylorpublic domain
Petitioner’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Denied 03/10/2017
Brunson v. Taylorpublic domain
Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 10th of March 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby *788certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of March 2017."
Brunson v. Taylorpublic domain
Petitioner’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus • Denied 02/15/2017
Brunson v. Taylorpublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Brunson v. Taylorpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ivory Brunson v. Statepublic domain
DAMOORGIAN, C.J. Ivory Brunson pled no contest to possession of cocaine but reserved the right to appeal the trial court’s dispositive ruling1 on his motion to suppress. He argues that the search of his person lead*141ing to the discovery of the cocaine was illegal because it was tainted by the illegal search of a hotel room. We agree and
Brunson v. Statepublic domain
McFadden, Judge. After a jury trial, Elijah Brunson was convicted of sexual battery of his 15-year-old granddaughter. Brunson appeals, claiming that the state was improperly allowed to use a prior statement to attempt to impeach him and that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the attempted impeachment. Because there was no objection to the state’s use of the prior statement, that issue was not preserve
Brunson v. N.C. Dept. of Pub. Safety's Superintendent Felix Taylor of Pasquotank Corr. Inst.public domain
Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 6th of February 2017 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of February 2017."
Brunson v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking post-conviction relief on the issue of *848his sentence as a habitual violent felony offender. GUNTHER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Brunson v. Crown Brake, LLCpublic domain
George Carnal Gaiennie, III, Gaiennie Law Firm, L.L.C., 201 Johnston Street - Suite 101 B, Alexandria, LA 71301, Telephone: (318) 704-5784, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Crown Brake, LLC Cliffe Edward Laborde, III, Mahtook & LaFleur, 1000 Chase Tower, 600 Jefferson Street, Lafayette, LA 70501, Telephone: (337) 266-2189, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Crown Brake, LLC Stacy Christopher Auzenne, Auzenne Law Firm, L.L.
Brunson v. Crown Brake, LLCpublic domain
George Carnal Gaiennie, III, Gaiennie Law Firm, L.L.C., 201 Johnston Street - Suite 101 B, Alexandria, LA 71301, Telephone: (318) 704-5784, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Crown Brake, LLC Cliffe Edward Laborde, III, Mahtook & LaFleur, 1000 Chase Tower, 600 Jefferson Street, Lafayette, LA 70501, Telephone: (337) 266-2189, COUNSEL FOR: Defendant/Appellee - Crown Brake, LLC Stacy Christopher Auzenne, Auzenne Law Firm, L.L.
James Brunson v. Scott Murraypublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge, Plaintiff James Brunson owns a package liquor store in Bridgeport, Illinois. He asserts that city officials violated his constitutional rights by refusing to renew his liquor license and orchestrating a campaign of harassment and outright violence. *701 Brunson has offered e
In re Brunsonpublic domain
*761 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA J. HOUSER, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the court are fifteen objections to proofs of unsecured claim filed by Roland Kim Brunson and Charlene Brunson (the “Debtors”). The district court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334, and this court has constitutional author
Molly A. Brunson v. Adrienne Ashley, individuallypublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Nos. 1D16-4972 1D17-3532 _____________________________ MOLLY A. BRUNSON, Appellant, v. ADRIENNE ASHLEY, individually and CATHY ASHLEY LANE, her parent and natural guardian during her minority, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Oka
Commonwealth v. Brunsonpublic domain
OPINION BY STEVENS, J.: ¶ 1 This is an appeal nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following Appellant’s conviction on the charges of robbery, attempted theft, possessing an instrument of crime, making terroristic threats, simple assault, and recklessly endangering another person. On appeal, Appellant contends the evidence was insu
People v. Taylorpublic domain
People v Taylor (2022 NY Slip Op 00774) People v Taylor 2022 NY Slip Op 00774 Decided on February 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Brunson v. Bayer Corp.public domain
237 F.Supp.2d 192 (2002) BRUNSON v. BAYER CORP. No. 3:01CV353(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 27, 2002. *193 *194 *195 W. Martyn Philpot, Jr., Laura Lee A. Dorflinger, Law Offices of W. Martyn Philpot, Jr., LLC, New Haven, CT, f
Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit Unionpublic domain
972 A.2d 1112 (2009) 199 N.J. 381 Howard D. BRUNSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AFFINITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a corporation, doing business in the State of New Jersey and Jim Wilcox, individually and as agent/employee of Affinity Federal Credit Union, Defendants-Appellants. A-60 September Term 2008 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 10, 2009.
Gordon v. Brunsonpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 537 This is an appeal by the guardian ad litem from a final decree of the Probate Court of Mobile County rendered after hearing on a petition for final settlement of a guardianship estate of three minors on the occasion of the resignation of the guardian. The facts necessary to an understanding of this case are
Shelton v. Brunsonpublic domain
335 F.Supp. 186 (1971) Michael J. SHELTON, Petitioner. v. Carl L. BRUNSON, Col. U. S. Air Force, Commander 3500th Pilot Training Wing, Reese Air Force Base, Texas, et al., Respondents. Civ. A. No. 5-980. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Lubbock Division. December 10, 1971. *187 John J. C. O'Shea, Lubbock, Tex., for peti