Cases

MURDOCK, Justice (dissenting in appeal no. 1110698). I respectfully dissent as to this Court’s affirmance of the trial court’s judgment in case no. 1110698. I question the rejection by this Court of more than one of the arguments made by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and Certain London Marketing Insurance Companies (hereinafter “LMI”) in their appeal of this judgment. Among other things, I disagree

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff London market insurance companies (“LMI”) seek to compel defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) to re-produce two documents used by LMI as deposition exhibits that Amtrak has since “clawed back” after asserting attorney-client privilege and work-product protections. For the following reasons, LMI’s motio

Owens, J. ¶22 (concurring/dissenting) — This case involves three types of claims by American Best Food Inc. (Café Arizona)7 against its insurer, Alea London Ltd. (Alea): breach of contract; the tort of bad faith; and violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW. *415The majority holds that,

709 F.Supp.2d 517 (2010) RINCON DEL SOL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LLOYD'S OF LONDON, Steadfast Insurance Company, Essex Insurance Company, Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Crouch Insurance Consulting, Gregory Crouch, York Claims Service, Inc. d/b/a York Sla, Mike Carpenter d/b/a Carpenter Asset Management *518 Associates LLC, Michelle Whiteside, Individually, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Bank of America Corporation,

CYNTHIA BRYAN, AUBRY * NO. 2024-C-0694 BRYAN, JR., AUNYA BRYAN, AND GLENDA BRYAN * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT LOUISIANA CITIZENS * STATE OF LOUISIANA PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION AS THE * GUARANTOR OF THE INSOLVENT

This is an appeal from the trial court's order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Green Brook Contractors (Green Brook). On October 28, 1993, Green Brook filed a complaint in Jefferson County for declaratory relief. Green Brook requested that the trial court declare a lien filed by J.R. Bryan, Jr., to be a nullity and expunge the lien from the probate records. We would note that Bryan claimed that he had performed certain work for Green Brook and had not r

27 F.Supp.2d 1306 (1998) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, Subscribing to Policy No. 200/451/8505, Plaintiff, v. Etienne GIROIRE, and Associated Marine Institutes, Inc. Defendants. Etienne Giroire, Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Berg Williams Marine Insurance, and David Williams, Third Party Defendant. No. 96-7398-Civ-GOLD. United States District Court, S.D. Flor

USCA11 Case: 22-10048 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2023 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10048 ____________________ EMERGENCY RECOVERY, INC., et al.,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00493-CV ___________________________ BRYAN RIGG, Appellant V. JOSHUA HICKSON AND MACY HOLLIS, Appellees On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141-342494-23 Before Sudderth, C.J., and Kerr and Walker, JJ.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 456 {¶ 1} This appeal stems from an order requiring defendant-appellant, Craig E. Bryan, to pay plaintiff-appellee, Dina M. Bryan's, attorney fees and expenses, under R.C. 2323.51, as a sanction for filing a legally groundless motion for the reallocation of parental rights.

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00198-CR ___________________________ BRYAN ISADORE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 297th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1554206D Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

843 F.Supp. 597 (1994) SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, Plaintiff, v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, Sphere Drake Insurance PLC, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. C-93-1025 SAW. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 27, 1994. *598 *599 *60

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #009 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 6th day of March, 2026 are as follows: BY Cole, J.: 2025-C-00443 CYNTHIA BRYAN, AUBRY BRYAN, JR., AUNYA BRYAN, AND GLENDA BRYAN VS. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION AS THE GUARANTOR OF THE INSOLVENT INSURANCE COMPANY,

2020 WI 40 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP1616 COMPLETE TITLE: London Scott Barney, a minor, by David P. Lowe, his guardian ad litem and Raquel Barney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Freddie Eugene Owens, Brad Keith Sigmon, Gary DuBose Terry, and Richard Bernard Moore, Respondents-Appellants, v. Bryan P. Stirling, in his official capacity as the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; South Carolina Department of Corrections; and Henry McMaster, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina, Appellants-Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2022-001280 A

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________

OPINION OF THE COURT (January 31, 2017) Edward Pelle appeals the Superior Court’s decision to not apply the holding of a recent Virgin Islands Supreme Court case — changing the interpretation of a local statute — to a final judgment entered against him in 2007. We affirm the Superior Court’s decision and hold that this Court’s interpretation of a law does not render an earlier final judgment void even though it was

947 So.2d 1270 (2007) Dennis Markly BRYAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D05-3363. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 2, 2007. *1271 J. Peyton Quarles of Zimmet & Quarles, P.L., Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, A

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judge TATEL joins, dissenting: The presumption of mens rea embodies deeply rooted principles of law and justice that the Supreme Court has emphasized time and again. The presumption of mens rea is no mere technicality, but rather implicates “fundamental and far-reaching” issues, as this case well illustrates. Cf. Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 247,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 13, 2014 ERIC BRYAN HOWARD v. KELLY JO HALFORD Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Cumberland County No. 2012-JV-2632 Larry Michael Warner, Judge No. E2014-00002-COA-R3-JV-FILED-DECEMBER 22, 2014 This case involves the trial court’s grant of a post-judgment motion to clarify conflictin