Cases

740 A.2d 198 (1999) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Kelly O'DONNELL, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 20, 1997. Decided October 28, 1999. *201 Robert Brett Dunham, Philadelphia, for K. O'Donnell. Catherine Marshall, Karen A. Brancheau, Philadelphia, for the Com. Robert A. Graci, Ha

117 N.J. 210 (1989) 564 A.2d 1202 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES O'DONNELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued September 12, 1989. Decided October 25, 1989. *212 Catherine A. Foddai, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter N.

728 P.2d 1132 (1986) James Vernon BRYANT, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Brent HORNBUCKLE, Appellee (Defendant), Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland corporation, (Defendant). No. 86-99. Supreme Court of Wyoming. December 10, 1986. *1134 Robert C. Wilson, Casper, for appellant. John E. Brooks and John I. Henley of Vlastos, Brooks

Opinion by Justice CLEO E. POWELL. We consider these two appeals together because they present similar assignments of error regarding the wounding or bodily injury element necessary to prove the crime of strangulation in violation of Code § 18.2-51.6. In each case, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in its findings regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to prove bodily in

Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment only. {¶ 25} Respectfully, I concur in the majority’s judgment but not fully in its reasoning. I agree with the majority that it is unnecessary in resolving this case to address whether R.C. 2152.18(B) is unconstitutional as applied to appellant, D.S. I disagree, however, with the majority’s decision to resolve the issue of statutory interpretation that D.S. raises — wh

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a claim under the Massachusetts wage and hour laws. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff Michael Napert worked as an adjuster for defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”). He alleges that GEICO intentionally failed to pay him his earned hourly wages as requir

08/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 21, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY WAYNE PONDER Appeal from the Criminal Court for DeKalb County No. 2017-CR-4 Gary McKenzie, Judge ___________________________________

O’Donnell, J. {¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether the trial court violated Darius Clark’s constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him when it admitted a hearsay statement that three-and-a-half-year-old L.P. made to his preschool teacher, Debra Jones, in response to questions asked about injuries to his eye and marks on his face observed upon his arrival at a p

Whiteiiouse, J. The question involved in this case will appear from the following statement of facts. The defendant, Kingsbury Donnell, owned certain real estate with buildings thereon, and was indebted to the plaintiff. September 4, 1891, the plaintiff brought suit on his debt and attached Kingsbury Donnell’s real estate. October 28, 1891, Kingsbury Donnell procured two policies of insurance on his buildings

573 F.Supp.2d 677 (2008) Lisa ASP & Paulette Mertes, Plaintiffs, v. MILARDO PHOTOGRAPHY, INC., Snapshot Photography, LLC, Theodore Milardo, Elizabeth Milardo, Defendants. No. 3:04 CV 1016(DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 28, 2008. *679 Anthony J. Pantuso, III, Richard Eugene Hayber, Hayber & Pant

OPINION Justice TODD. In this capital case, Rasheed Simpson appeals the order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas dismissing without a hearing his petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-46. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings as directed. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY <

165 P.3d 674 (2007) Hal OWENS, a married man dealing with his sole and separate property, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Appellee, v. M.E. SCHEPP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona partnership, Defendant/Counterclaimant, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 06-0162. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. August 23, 2007. *675 Perkins

107 P.3d 651 (2005) 198 Or. App. 110 Ronald H. CHECKLEY, individually, Appellant, and Ronald H. Checkley, as Guardian Ad Litem for Shad Alan Wagner; and Lon A. Bryant, as Guardian Ad Litem for Shad Alan Wagner, Plaintiffs, v. James Timothy BOYD, personal representative of the Estate of Charles Boyd, deceased; Bimla Boyd; and Keizer Congregation Of Jehovah'S Witnesses, Salem, Oregon, an Oregon not for profit corporation

04/10/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 6, 2024 Session RICHARD BROCK HILL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission No. T20202222-1 James A. Haltom, Commissioner ___________________________________

17 A.3d 873 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. James Melvin SMITH, Appellant. No. 591 CAP. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted July 1, 2010. Decided March 29, 2011. *879 Cristi A. Charpentier, Billy Horatio Nolas, Defender Association of Philadelphia, *880 M

60 P.3d 1158 (2003) 185 Or.App. 525 Bobbie STROME, Respondent, and Garth STROME, Appellant, and Suzanne E. Strome, Respondent-below. 99-CV-0259-MA; A111369. Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted April 30, 2002. Resubmitted October 15, 2002. Decided January 8, 2003. Russell Lipetzky argued

958 F.Supp. 359 (1997) Perry MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. Carl WALKER and Robert Grace, Defendants. No. 96 C 6695. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 27, 1997. *360 *361 Michael W. Fleming, Terry O'Donnell, O'Donnell, Grady & Manchen, P.C., Elmhurst, IL, for

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 24, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER BRYAN HANCOCK Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 09-CR-013 John F. Dugger, Jr., Judge No. E2011-00111-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 24, 2012 A Hamblen County Criminal Court Jury convicted the appellant, Christopher Bryan

Nebraska Advance Sheets 400 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS and is therefore vacated. We remand the cause for resen- tencing by the district court as to Taylor’s conviction for a Class IA felony. Taylor’s sentence for use of a deadly weapon to commit a felony is affirmed and is to be consecutive to the sentence imposed by the district court on the mur- der conviction. Affirmed in part, sentence vacated in part, and cause remanded for resentencing. Connolly and McCormack, JJ., p

[Cite as Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. White, 122 Ohio St.3d 562, 2009-Ohio-3718.] SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLANT, v. WHITE ET AL.; FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. White, 122 Ohio St.3d 562, 2009-Ohio-3718.] When a liability insurance policy defines an “occurrence” as an “accident,” a negligent act committed by an insured that is predicated on the commission of an intentional tort by another person,