⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bryant v. Yuma County”

District Court, District of Columbia · 1964-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 231 F. Supp. 548; 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8004
231 F.Supp. 548 (1964) YUMA COUNTY WATER USERS' ASSOCIATION, Yuma, Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1499-64. United States District Court District of Columbia. July 22, 1964. Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Robert L. McCarty, Washington, D. C., Bryant W. Jones, Rolle, Jones & Miller, Yuma, Ariz., for plaintiff.
Bryant v. Yellenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1980-08-11 · Published · cited 95× · 65 L. Ed. 2d 184; 100 S. Ct. 2232; 447 U.S. 352; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 5
447 U.S. 352 (1980) BRYANT ET AL. v. YELLEN ET AL. No. 79-421. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 25, 1980. Decided June 16, 1980.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *354 Northcutt Ely and Charles W. Bender argued the cause for petitioners
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002-09-26 · Published · cited 29× · 54 P.3d 837; 203 Ariz. 368; 383 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27; 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 153
54 P.3d 837 (2002) 203 Ariz. 368 Jeremy FLANDERS, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, an administrative agency of Maricopa County; Joseph M. Arpaio and Ava Arpaio, husband and wife, both individually and in his capacity as chief administrative officer of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Defendants-
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989-12-19 · Published · cited 35× · 788 P.2d 1235; 163 Ariz. 484; 50 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 9; 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 357
OPINION The following issues are presented for our consideration: (1) whether placement of the juvenile in a residential treatment program was appropriate; *Page 485 (2) whether Pinal County properly transferred the juvenile's case to Maricopa County; and, (3) whether this court must conduct an Anders review of the juvenile's record of proceedings pertaining to the delinquency petition.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977-11-15 · Published · cited 13× · 575 P.2d 801; 118 Ariz. 171; 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 813
118 Ariz. 171 (1977) 575 P.2d 801 HONEYWELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Department of Property Valuation, an agency of the State of Arizona, Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 3290. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. November 15, 1977.
Dach v. Homewoodpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 19× · 2015 Ohio 4191
[Cite as Dach v. Homewood, 2015-Ohio-4191.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Kristin Dach et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : v. : No. 14AP-502 (C.P.C. No. 10DR-2706 ) David A. Homewood, :
Beck v. Nevillepublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 2024-01-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STEVEN P. BECK, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. RICHARD N EVILLE, ET AL., Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-22-0134-PR Filed January 9, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Kadlec v. Dorseypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009-12-24 · Published · cited 2× · 223 P.3d 674; 223 Ariz. 330; 572 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 18; 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 789
OPINION VÁSQUEZ, Judge. ¶ 1 In this action to enforce an easement, appellants Daniel and Sherri Dorsey appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Paul and Rachel Kadlec and Duane and Brenda Howell (collectively, Kadlec), and its denial of the Dorseys’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Dorseys argue the court erred in finding that an easement for a roadway runni
Smith v. Arizonapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 129× · 602 U.S. 779
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-12-20 · Published · cited 5× · 46 F.4th 915
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, ORDER AND Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist
Smith v. Arizonapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-21 · Published · cited 88× · 602 U.S. 779
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 779–820 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Harrelson v. Dupnikpublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 2013-08-27 · Published · cited 1× · 970 F. Supp. 2d 953; 2013 WL 4525195; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121891
ORDER FRANK R. ZAPATA, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Estrada. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Estrada recommends denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motions for summary judgment, the objection
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009-03-16 · Published · cited 10× · 453 Mass. 389; 902 N.E.2d 410; 2009 Mass. LEXIS 41; 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2097
Cowin, J. The city of Boston (city) appeals from a decision of the Labor Relations Commission (commission)2 that held that the city had committed unfair labor practices in its dealings with the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association (union), the exclusive bargaining representative for the city’s uniformed police employees.3 Specifically, the commission concluded th
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR
State v. Rosariopublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999-08-31 · Published · cited 90× · 987 P.2d 226; 195 Ariz. 264; 303 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3; 1999 Ariz. App. LEXIS 155
987 P.2d 226 (1999) 195 Ariz. 264 STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Edward R. ROSARIO, Petitioner. No. 1 CA-CR 96-0873 PR. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. August 31, 1999. *227 Edward R. Rosario, Florence, In Propria Persona. Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney by Geral
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 14× · 135 F.4th 645
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009-07-28 · Published · cited 12× · 213 P.3d 361; 222 Ariz. 212; 561 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29; 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 669
213 P.3d 361 (2009) Maria Elisa Pozo PARRA, the surviving mother of Maria Fernanda Chavez Pozo and the surviving daughter of Maria Elisa Parra Morales, on her own behalf and on behalf of Luis Chavez Reyes, the father of Maria Fernanda Chavez Pozo; Sandra Guadalupe Parra, a single woman and Eulalia Mejia Avila, a single woman; Maria Elisa Pozo Parra, as mother and next best friend for Maria Guadalupe Pozo Parran, a minor, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:19-cv-00408 (TNM) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs,