Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bryant v. Yuma County”
YUMA COUNTY WATER USERS'ASSOCIATION v. Udallpublic domain
231 F.Supp. 548 (1964) YUMA COUNTY WATER USERS' ASSOCIATION, Yuma, Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1499-64. United States District Court District of Columbia. July 22, 1964. Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Robert L. McCarty, Washington, D. C., Bryant W. Jones, Rolle, Jones & Miller, Yuma, Ariz., for plaintiff.
Bryant v. Yellenpublic domain
447 U.S. 352 (1980) BRYANT ET AL. v. YELLEN ET AL. No. 79-421. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 25, 1980. Decided June 16, 1980.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *354 Northcutt Ely and Charles W. Bender argued the cause for petitioners
Flanders v. Maricopa Countypublic domain
54 P.3d 837 (2002) 203 Ariz. 368 Jeremy FLANDERS, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, an administrative agency of Maricopa County; Joseph M. Arpaio and Ava Arpaio, husband and wife, both individually and in his capacity as chief administrative officer of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Defendants-
OPINION The following issues are presented for our consideration: (1) whether placement of the juvenile in a residential treatment program was appropriate; *Page 485 (2) whether Pinal County properly transferred the juvenile's case to Maricopa County; and, (3) whether this court must conduct an Anders review of the juvenile's record of proceedings pertaining to the delinquency petition.
118 Ariz. 171 (1977) 575 P.2d 801 HONEYWELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Department of Property Valuation, an agency of the State of Arizona, Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 3290. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. November 15, 1977.
Dach v. Homewoodpublic domain
[Cite as Dach v. Homewood, 2015-Ohio-4191.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Kristin Dach et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : v. : No. 14AP-502 (C.P.C. No. 10DR-2706 ) David A. Homewood, :
Beck v. Nevillepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STEVEN P. BECK, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. RICHARD N EVILLE, ET AL., Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-22-0134-PR Filed January 9, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable
Washington v. David Shinnpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Kadlec v. Dorseypublic domain
OPINION VÁSQUEZ, Judge. ¶ 1 In this action to enforce an easement, appellants Daniel and Sherri Dorsey appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Paul and Rachel Kadlec and Duane and Brenda Howell (collectively, Kadlec), and its denial of the Dorseys’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Dorseys argue the court erred in finding that an easement for a roadway runni
Smith v. Arizonapublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Washington v. David Shinnpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Washington v. David Shinnpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, ORDER AND Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist
Smith v. Arizonapublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 779–820 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Harrelson v. Dupnikpublic domain
ORDER FRANK R. ZAPATA, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Estrada. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Estrada recommends denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motions for summary judgment, the objection
Cowin, J. The city of Boston (city) appeals from a decision of the Labor Relations Commission (commission)2 that held that the city had committed unfair labor practices in its dealings with the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association (union), the exclusive bargaining representative for the city’s uniformed police employees.3 Specifically, the commission concluded th
The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR
State v. Rosariopublic domain
987 P.2d 226 (1999) 195 Ariz. 264 STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Edward R. ROSARIO, Petitioner. No. 1 CA-CR 96-0873 PR. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. August 31, 1999. *227 Edward R. Rosario, Florence, In Propria Persona. Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney by Geral
The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH
Parra v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.public domain
213 P.3d 361 (2009) Maria Elisa Pozo PARRA, the surviving mother of Maria Fernanda Chavez Pozo and the surviving daughter of Maria Elisa Parra Morales, on her own behalf and on behalf of Luis Chavez Reyes, the father of Maria Fernanda Chavez Pozo; Sandra Guadalupe Parra, a single woman and Eulalia Mejia Avila, a single woman; Maria Elisa Pozo Parra, as mother and next best friend for Maria Guadalupe Pozo Parran, a minor, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v.
Rio Grande International Study Center v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:19-cv-00408 (TNM) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs,