Cases

OPINION LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Claimant Ronald Miller seeks review of a denial of his application for Social Security benefits. On remand from the Appeals Council, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Miller was' not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and therefore did not qualify for benefits. Miller appealed the decision

PER CURIAM: Thomas Scott Henry appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Henry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by (1) refusing to give pr

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy C

238 F.Supp.2d 521 (2002) G-I HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BARON & BUDD; Frederick Baron; Russell Budd; Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole; Ronald Motley; Joseph Rice; Weitz & Luxenberg; Perry Weitz and Robert Gordon, Defendants. No. 01 Civ. 0216(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 17, 2002. *522<

179 F.Supp.2d 233 (2001) G-I HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BARON & BUDD; Frederick Baron; Russell Budd; Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole; Ronald Motley; Joseph Rice; Weitz & Luxenberg; Perry Weitz and Robert Gordon, Defendants. No. 01 CIV. 0216(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 11, 2001. *

410 Mich. 231 (1981) 301 N.W.2d 285 SMITH v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION DOERR v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING DIVISION, HOUDAILLE INDUSTRIES, INC Docket Nos. 62991, 63372. (Calendar Nos. 4, 5). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued March 4, 1980. Decided February 3, 1981. *232 Roth

737 F.2d 187 SECURITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT COUNCIL 82,AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPALEMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, by its Treasurer William CLAY, RichardBischert, William Lothrop, Robert Morse, George Frees,Thomas F. Lynch, Richard J. Schrade, David L. Bowser,Charles E. Gordon, Jr., Melvin L. Bullock, Benjamin Whaleyand Squire Simpson, individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert Carter, Judge, entered January 31, 1983, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive and. monetary relief for alleged deprivations of rights, privileges and immunities guaranteed by the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution

169 F.2d 571 (1948) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. EDWARD G. BUDD MFG. CO. No. 10259. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. August 16, 1948. *572 *573 W. R. Consedine, of Washington D. C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel and A. Norman Somers, both of Washington, D. C., Joseph B. Robison, of New York

The main question upon this record is, whether the legislation fixing the maximum charge for elevating grain, contained in the act, chapter 581 of the Laws of 1888, is valid and constitutional. The act, in its first section, fixes the maximum charge for receiving, weighing and discharging grain by means of floating and stationary elevators and warehouses in this state, at five-eighths of one cent a bushel, and for trimming and shoveling to the leg of the elevator in the process of handling gr

346 Mich. 544 (1956) 78 N.W.2d 273 MELIA v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 46,705. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided September 4, 1956. *547 Zwerdling, Zwerdling, Keith & Livingston (A.L. Zwerdling, of counsel), for plaintiff. Thomas M. Kavanagh,

Feely, S. From the agreed state of fact submitted herein, it appears that this testator, without disclosing to a public hospital, upon such threshold inquiry as it made, that he was worth over $400,000, somehow availed himself of the more distinctly charity service of the hospital, which, finally, in passing him from its out-patient department to its in-patient service, as such charity patient, exercised its exc

ORDER John E. Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 18), recommending that the Commissioner’s final decision denying Timothy Mc.Gleary’s application for benefits be affirmed and the appeal be denied, and, after an independent review of the record, and noting that the Plaintiff filed object

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AMY JO HICKS (17-5206); LINDA BLACKBURN (17- ┐ 5211); WILLIE OUSLEY, on behalf of the Estate of │ Patricia L. Ousley (17-5212); CHERRIE JUSTICE (17- │ 5213); LEAH ANN J

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT BHARATHAN JEEVANANDAM vs. VANIKALA BHARATHAN; DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, thirdparty defendant Docket: SJC-13687 Dates: March 5, 2025 - May 28, 202

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13495 COMMONWEALTH vs. QUASIM HASTINGS & another.1 Berkshire.

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ANNE WEISS[1] vs. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (and eleven consolidated cases[2]) Docket: SJC-13688 Dates: February 10, 2025 – October 6, 2025

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. PHILIP J. MARQUIS Docket: SJC-13562 Dates: September 9, 2024 – March 11, 2025 Present:

GAZIANO, J. *1149 **666 A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree, as a joint venturer, in the shooting death of Quintin Koehler on July 7, 2012, at his grand

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-11674 COMMONWEALTH vs. EARL T. FULGIAM (and thirteen companion