⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Buddy Mac Holdings, LLC”

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Pa. Super. 196; 264 A.3d 782
J-E01007-21 2021 PA Super 196 ROBERT KIMBLE, ADMINISTRATOR : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF : PENNSYLVANIA THE ESTATE OF SHARON KIMBLE : AND ROBERT KIMBLE IN HIS OWN : RIGHT : : : v. : : No. 617 EDA 2019
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-11-10 · Published · cited 16× · 143 F. Supp. 3d 982; 2015 WL 6955086
ORDER RE: (1) MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS; (2) MOTION TO STRIKE COUNTERCLAIMS; AND (3) MOTION TO TRANSFER BOND MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Real Action Paintball, Inc. and its principal, K.T. Tran (collectively ‘Real Action”)1 *994filed 18 counterclaims in th
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007-04-05 · Published · cited 2× · 514 F. Supp. 2d 934; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25572
514 F.Supp.2d 934 (2007) SPECTRUM CREATIONS, L.P., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN KINDER INTERNATIONAL, LLC & The Uttermost Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-05-CV-750-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. April 5, 2007. *935 Mark L. Greenwald, The Law Offices of Mark Louis Greenwald, Robert Loye M
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2024-11-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2023 Session TERRY CASE v. WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 20-0144 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor ___________________________________ No. E2021-00
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2024-11-14 · Published · cited 0×
11/14/2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2023 Session TERRY CASE v. WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 20-0144 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancell
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm and Opinion Filed June 16, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00536-CV JIMMY E. WHITED, Appellant V. OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-12-18 · Published · cited 16× · 776 F.3d 200; 2015 WL 151610
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS joined. Judge MOTZ wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment. AGEE, Circuit Judge: Collin Hawkins was indicted on separate counts related to a carjacking and a subsequent arrest as a felon in possession of a firearm. Prior to trial, Hawkins timely moved the court to sever the carjacking
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-12-18 · Published · cited 13× · 589 F.3d 694; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27835; 2009 WL 4906678
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS joined. Judge MOTZ wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION AGEE, Circuit Judge: Collin Hawkins was indicted on separate counts related to a carjacking and a subsequent arrest as a felon in possession of a firearm. Prior to trial, Hawkins timely moved the cou
Clark v. Clarkpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 58 So. 3d 1276; 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 287; 2010 WL 3937938
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1278 Sherri Clark ("the wife") appeals from a judgment of the Houston Circuit Court divorcing her from William T. Clark ("the husband") to the extent that the judgment divided the parties' property and declined to award her alimony or to reserve the right to award her alimony in the future. We affirm in part and
Buchanan v. Metzpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 132 F. Supp. 3d 922; 2015 WL 5335062; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121835
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION This civil rights litigation arises out of Plaintiff John C. Buchanan, Jr.’s involvement in attempting to redevelop a manufacturing plant into a film studio and claim a credit under Michigan’s Film and Digital Media Tax Credit program. When the
Katz v. Chevaldinapublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015-08-17 · Published · cited 24× · 127 F. Supp. 3d 1285; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118728; 2015 WL 5255429
ORDER GRANTING IN PART BILL OF COSTS AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ May 6, 2015 Report and Recommendation (the “R & R on Costs”) (DE 198), which recommends granting in part Defendant’s Bill of Costs (DE 170), and Magistrate Judge Torres’ May 6, 2015 Rep
Lafferty v. Jonespublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020-07-23 · Published · cited 4× · 336 Conn. 332
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016-08-22 · Published · cited 2× · 202 F. Supp. 3d 918; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115152; 2016 WL 4473015
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL JUDGMENT BASED THEREON SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE This matter is before the Court for decision on the issues of validity, enforceability, and infringement of three patents owned by Plaintiff Acrux DDS PTY Ltd. (“Acrux”). Plaintiff Eli Lilly Export S.A. is the exclusive worldwide licensee of the patents at issue in this litigation and has licensed its rights
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 4× · 301 F.R.D. 53; 2014 WL 2980256
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: On March 12, 2013, a jury convicted Defendant Gilberto Valle of conspiracy to commit kidnapping (Count One), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(e), and of conducting a computer search of a federal database that exceeded his authorized access (Count Two), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(B). (Verdict Form (Dkt. No. 126)) Valle ha
in Re: Bryan Rowespublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01533-CV 05-15-01533-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/17/2015 10:17:26 AM
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2