⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Burbach v. Modern Woman Inc”

District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 1364
MARK H. COHEN, United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendant AMEC Foster Wheeler Programs, Inc.'s ("AMEC") Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7]. For the reasons explained below, AMEC's motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND In June 2015, the United States Army Corps of Engineers issued a solicitation for a construction project in Poland (the "Project").
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Michigan Supreme Court · 1991-08-02 · Published · cited 169× · 473 N.W.2d 268; 437 Mich. 627; 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1185; 1991 Mich. LEXIS 1810
Levin, J. (dissenting). i The lead and concurring opinions misstate the issue, and proceed on the basis of a mistaken assumption._ *677A The mistaken assumption concerns a fundamental point of law. It is assumed that statements made to Mary Rowe, corro
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Van Orden v. Perrypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-06-27 · Published · cited 343× · 162 L. Ed. 2d 607; 125 S. Ct. 2854; 545 U.S. 677; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5215; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 494
545 U.S. 677 (2005) VAN ORDEN v. PERRY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF TEXAS AND CHAIRMAN, STATE PRESERVATION BOARD, ET AL. No. 03-1500. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 2, 2005. Decided June 27, 2005. *679 Erwin Chemerinsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were
Michigan Supreme Court · 1992-06-09 · Published · cited 89× · 487 N.W.2d 166; 439 Mich. 650
Levin, J. (concurring). Jane and Nancy Doe concede, for the purposes of this lawsuit, that 1987 PA 59, adding § 109a of the Social Welfare Act,1 insofar as it proscribes the use of public funds to pay for an elective abortion, is in the main constitutional — possibly ninety to ninety-nine percent constitutional. Doe and her
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS