⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Burlington No RR Co v. City of The Colony”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-05-24 · Published · cited 134× · 862 F. Supp. 2d 226; 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1557; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72641; 2012 WL 1889780
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction..............................................................234 II. Facts....................................................................235 A. Parties..............................................................235 B. Sotomayor’s Initial Employment
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950-02-08 · Published · cited 3× · 71 A.2d 220; 6 N.J. Super. 333; 1950 N.J. Super. LEXIS 866
6 N.J. Super. 333 (1950) 71 A.2d 220 HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 23, 1950. Decided February 8, 1950. *335 Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW. Mr. John Warren<
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 OK 51
OSCN Found Document:NYE v. BNSF RAILWAY CO. NYE v. BNSF RAILWAY CO.2018 OK 51Case Number: 113142Decided: 06/19/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 51, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-09-17 · Published · cited 437× · 621 F.3d 111; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19382
Judge LEVAL concurs only in the judgment of the Court dismissing the complaint and files a separate opinion. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Once again we consider a ease brought under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. § 1350,1 a jurisdictional provision unlike any other in American law and of a kind apparently unknown to any other legal system in the world. Passed by
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-10-25 · Published · cited 2× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 1052
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Evidence, filed August 17, 2018 (Doc. 236)("MIL 1"). The Court held a hearing on September 14, 2018. The primary issue is whether evidence of land use by other than Plaintiff Pueblo of Jemez after 1848 -- the year when the Pueblo Indians can under United States jurisdiction -- is
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994-12-20 · Published · cited 10× · 891 P.2d 1219; 1994 OK 150; 65 O.B.A.J. 4201; 1994 Okla. LEXIS 173; 1994 WL 706218
891 P.2d 1219 (1994) WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Williams Pipe Line Company and Williams Telecom Group, Petitioners, v. The STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION and the Oklahoma Tax Commission, Respondents. No. 84097. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. December 20, 1994. Rehearing Denied March 7, 1995. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson by Graydon
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2015-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
2nd Court of Appeals Docket Sheet Case Number: 02-14-00143-CV Date Filed: 05/07/2014 9:14AM Style: Appellant Harry Bizios v.Appellee Town of Lakewood Village, Texas
United States Tax Court · 1980-12-31 · Published · cited 3× · 75 T.C. 497; 1980 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 1
CONTENTS Page Headnote . 499 Opinion (Introduction) . 505 General Findings of Fact . 506 I. Issue (i): Rapid Amortization of Freight Cars Findings of Fact Opinion . 1Í5 ^ H H CO LO lO lO II. Issues (hh) and (9): Recovery Upon Merger of Previously Deducted Amounts . 548 Findings of Fact . 549 Opinion . 557 Is
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00255-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 10/26/2015 5:42:50 PM
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 87 F. Supp. 2d 373; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21647; 1999 WL 1491620
87 F.Supp.2d 373 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jerome LIGHTMAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 92-4710 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 30, 1999. *374 Robert A. Gladstone, Nan Bernardo, Shanley & Fisher, P.C., Morristown, NJ, for Joint Defense Group. Eric S. Aronson, Donna
United States Tax Court · 1995-01-11 · Published · cited 52× · 104 T.C. 13; 1995 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 2; 104 T.C. No. 2
Parr, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioners’ Federal corporate income taxes, net of offsets for credits or refunds of overassessments of taxes to which respondent agrees petitioners are entitled:1 Net Year deficiency 1981. $8,274,876
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004-07-16 · Published · cited 45× · 268 Neb. 360; 685 N.W.2d 335; 2004 Neb. LEXIS 126
268 Neb. 360 TERLE SLANSKY, APPELLANT, v. NEBRASKA STATE PATROL, APPELLEE. No. S-03-747. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 16, 2004. Bradley D. Holbrook, of Jacobsen, Orr, Nelson, Wright & Lindstrom, P.C., for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Mark D. Starr for appellee. HENDRY, C.J., CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLE
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999-01-27 · Published · cited 64× · 723 A.2d 440; 352 Md. 530; 1999 Md. LEXIS 33
723 A.2d 440 (1999) 352 Md. 530 BUCKTAIL, LLC v. The COUNTY COUNCIL OF TALBOT COUNTY et al. No. 38, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 27, 1999. Richard A. DeTar (Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.), on brief, Easton, for appellant. *441 Michael L. Pullen, David R. Thompson (Brynja M
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00255-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/10/2015 4:39:08 PM
Waldorf v. Shutapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990-02-07 · Published · cited 96× · 896 F.2d 723; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527
OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. This case presents an appeal and cross-appeals from an $8,400,000 jury verdict awarded a plaintiff who was rendered quadriplegic in a motor vehicle accident. Defendants the Borough of Kenilworth, New Jersey, and one of its police officers, Joseph Rego, appeal several issues of liability and damages.1 The plaintiff,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201