Cases

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Valero Energy Corporation’s (“VEC”) Motion for Summary Judgment,1 wherein VEC requests summary judgment in its favor dismissing Plaintiff Gerold David Burnette’s (“Plaintiff’) claims against VEC on the basis that it did not own or operate the Valero refining facility in Meraux,

353 S.C. 48 (2003) 577 S.E.2d 211 Wayne C. HOOKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of South Carolina, Respondent. No. 25590. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Submitted December 5, 2002. Decided February 3, 2003. *50 Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia; for Petitioner. Atto

838 S.W.2d 643 (1992) Cassandra Yolanda HOOKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-91-00730-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. July 23, 1992. Rehearing Denied October 16, 1992. Discretionary Review Granted January 27, 1993. Edgar A. Mason, Dallas, for appellant. Sharon Batjer, Dallas, for appellee. B

662 S.E.2d 272 (2008) BURNETTE v. The STATE. No. A08A0587. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 13, 2008. *275 Kelli Alana Devaney-Jackson, for Appellant. Louie Craig Fraser, Dist. Atty., Cheryl Ann Banks, Asst. Atty. Dist., for Appellee. MIKELL, Judge. Jeanette Denise Burnette was convicted of aggravated assault

330 F.Supp.2d 1311 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. Joanna Nicole HOOKS. Criminal Action No. 2:04cr9-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 12, 2004. John M. Poti, Prattville, AL, for Defendant. John T. Harmon, Leura Garrett Canary, Matthew S. Miner, U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff.

89 F.Supp.2d 1371 (2000) James M. MAULDIN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. James BURNETTE, et al., Defendants. No. 5:98-CV-355-1 (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. March 30, 2000. *1372 *1373 Bruce Robert Millar, Lee Sexton, J. Stevens Mixon, Jonesboro, GA, for James Marshal

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 280 The state has appealed from an order of the Summit County Common Pleas Court denying its request in limine to receive into evidence excited utterances and statements to a physician made by an alleged victim of rape and gross sexual imposition. The state has argued that (1) the trial court incorrectly determined th

Davis, J.: Estella Hooks Watson appeals from an order of the trial court limiting execution on a valid judgment for child support arrearages for as long as the judgment debtor continues to make weekly payments on the judgment. We hold that the trial court did not have the power to limit execution on the judgment and reverse. Estella Hooks Watson (petitioner) and Victor Hooks (respondent) were divorced in 1975

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 8, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AARON LEON BURNETTE, JR. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 06-01-0163 J. Weber McCraw, Judge No. W2006-02092-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 28, 2007 A Hardeman County Circuit Court jury convicted the appellant, Aaron Leon

ACCEPTED 01-09-00328-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUSTICE DEVINE delivered the opinion of the Court. In this oil and gas appeal, we consider whether a mineral owner’s claims of fraud *55 and breach of contract in the leasing and pooling of his mineral interests are, as a matter of law, barred by limitations. A jury determined that

SANBORN, Circuit Judge, after stating the case as above) delivered the opinion of the court. As this is a proceeding in equity, the writ of error must be dismissed, and the case must be considered and decided upon the appeal, and it is so ordered. The real question in the case is: May a court of equity, during the term at which the confirmation is made, lawfully avoid an executed judicial s

G. L. McAdams and his wife, Jennie McAdams, instituted this suit against J. B. Hooks, H. A. Hooks, S.W. Smith, Jack Dies, L. G. Roberts and Ed Carroll, to recover 160 acres of land out of the Hatton survey of 477 acres. He also sought to recover damages for the wrongful and malicious suing out of a writ of sequestration by J. B. Hooks, in a certain suit instituted by him against plaintiff McAdams for the land, and the wrongful, malicious and oppressive dispossession of himself and his wife fr

April 4, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action was commenced on the 21st day of November 1927. Upon the call of the calendar at the March term, 1928, Court of Common Pleas for Oconee County, S.C. a motion was made by defendant-appellant to refer the issues to the master. The motion was refused, and the defendant brings this appeal from the order denying the motion to refer. Notice of intention to appeal was given in due time. The question involved is: Did the Circ

Cardwell., J., delivered the opinion of the court. Plaintiff in error, Virginia O. Burnette, was, on the 5th day of June, 1905, the owner in fee simple of a certain tract of *185land in Henrico comity, Virginia, containing 121 acres, with improvements thereon; and on that date she, at the office of M. H. Omohundro, an attorney at law, in the city of Ric

The plaintiffs seek to recover the sum of $42.50, with interest at eight per cent, from 30 March, 1880, alleged to be due by note of *Page 453 defendant made payable on that day to H.A. Kluttz, and indorsed to plaintiffs for value after maturity. The execution of the note was not denied, but the defendant relied upon the plea of payment and, as a witness in his own behalf, testified in substance that he paid the note in cotton at Kluttz's gin, which was s

The case is disclosed by the testimony, and the charge of the judge, as stated himself, was as follows: The trespass for which the action was brought was charged to have been committed between the parallel lines in the diagram B C and N Y. Hooks' 90-acre patent was ten years older than the one under which the plaintiff claimed; Hooks' 100-acre patent is seven or eight years younger than the plaintiff's. The boundaries of Hooks' 90-acre patent are delineated in the diagram, and the begi

356 S.C. 421 (2003) 590 S.E.2d 25 The STATE, Respondent/Petitioner, v. Roy Edward HOOK, Petitioner/Respondent. No. 25752. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 8, 2003. Decided November 24, 2003. Rehearing Denied January 7, 2004. Katherine Carruth Link, and South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense,

Matter of Hook v Snyder. (2021 NY Slip Op 02458) Matter of Hook v Snyder. 2021 NY Slip Op 02458 Decided on April 22, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

DAVIS, J. Appellant, Virginia M. Carnesi, appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to appellees, Ferry Pass United Methodist Church, Pensacola District United Methodist Conference, and the Alabama West Florida United Methodist Conference (“church defendants”). We affirm. Carnesi filed a complaint against the church defendants and church volunteer Chet Harrison, who served as the