Cases

444 F.Supp.2d 909 (2006) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, Petitioners, v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 04 C 5852. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 11, 2006. Willis Rollin Tribler, H. Wesley Sunu, Tribler Orpett and Meyer, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Respondent. Robert Anthony Badgley, Susan Patricia Jorda

891 S.W.2d 689 (1994) Kassie Renee BYRD, Appellant, v. Katherine WOODRUFF, the Law Firm of Beggs & Woodruff, Jay Downs, and the Law Firm of Spears, Busch & Downs, Appellees. No. 05-93-00020-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 31, 1994. *695 Ben C. Martin, Joe Hill Jones, Dallas, for appellant. Charles T.

251 S.W.3d 31 (2008) TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Paula LEDBETTER, Representative of the Estate of Charles Wade Ledbetter, Individually and as Next Friend of Dustin Wade Ledbetter, a Minor, and Tonja Ledbetter and Jamie Ledbetter, Individually, Respondents. No. 06-0814. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 15, 2007. Opinion Delivered April

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00345-CV __________________ KIMBERLY LEVY COSTANZO, EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATES OF JOY LEVY AND SCOTT LEVY, Appellant V. TEXAS ADVANTAGE COMMUNITY BANK N.A., Appellee ____________

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

JANE BLAND, Justice, dissenting. A lender obtains a mortgage insurance policy to protect itself when its borrower fails to secure his own insurance coverage for mortgaged property, placing the lender’s collateral at risk. The borrower in this case did not secure his own homeowner’s coverage. The borrower now sues the lender’s insurance carrier directly for coverage for roof damage to his home. With no indicia o

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 2, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00120-CV 1001 WEST LOOP LP, GALLERIA LOOP NOTE HOLDER, LLC, 1001 WL GP, LLC, AND 1001 WL, LLC, Appellants V. BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Majority Opinion and Concurring and Dissenting Opinion filed October 17, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00467-CV ROBERT KELTON ROSENBERGER, Appellant V. HARVEY LEMASTER D/B/A INSURANCE OFFICE OF MONTGOMERY, Appellee On Appeal from the 405th District Cou

Opinion issued August 29, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00520-CV ——————————— NEXGEN BROADBAND, LLC, Appellant V. QUANTA TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00120-CV __________________ DENMAX ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND BATTLE RIVER HOLDINGS, INC., Appellants/Cross-Appellees V. LIGHTPOINT ENGINEERING, LLC, Appellee/Cro

Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 10, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01184-CV WILLIAM E. ROBINSON, JR., Appellant V. BORAL WINDOWS LLC F/K/A HEADWATERS WINDOWS, LLC, HEADWATERS WINDOWS, LLC N/K/A BORAL WINDOWS LLC, AND HEADWATERS INCORPORATED, Appellees

256 S.W.3d 660 (2008) EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ATOFINA PETROCHEMICALS, INC., Respondent. No. 03-0647. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued April 13, 2005. June 13, 2008. Opinion Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part February 15, 2008. *661 Henry S. Platts, Jeffery T. Nobles, Marcy

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 29, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00663-CV ROY JORDAN, JR., Appellant V. CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court

Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, Remanded, and Majority and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed August 30, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00295-CV ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. MARTA DIAZ, Appellee/Cross-Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSU

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's ("Evantson") Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. 66). Also before the Court is Evanston's Objections and Motion to Strike Evidence in Support of Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment.1 (Dkt. 92). Having considered the parties' briefs, the evidence, and the relevant law, the Court issues the

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00057-CV __________________ ZARKASHA ENTERPRISE, INC., Appellant V. OLD REPUBLIC TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CONROE AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIO

MEMORANDUM OPINION Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants.1 ECF No. 68. Plaintiff has filed a response. ECF No.-73. Defendants have filed a.reply. ECF No. 7,6. Plaintiff has filed a sur-reply, and Defendants have filed a response to the sur-reply. ECF Nos. 81-1 and 84-1. The matter is ripe for the

Case Number: 04-08-00839-CV 11/02/2011 Case stored in record room 08/24/2011 Mandate issued 07/01/2011 Opinion issued judgment of ct/appeals reversed judg. rendered 07/01/2011 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record Document issued by the Supreme Court 01/19/2011 Post submission brief 01/19/2011 Phone call from Clerk's Office 01/11/2011 Post submission brief 01/04/2011 Oral argument 01/04/2011 Exhibits in case/cause filed 12/20/2010 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT FILED BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS AND DISMISSING ALL THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS; (2) DENYING MOTION FOR JOINDER FILED BY THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS; AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the following Motions to Dismiss filed by Third-party Defendants pursuant to Federal Ru

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOS ANGELES LAKERS, INC., a No. 15-55777 California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-07743- v. DMG-SH FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, OPINION Defendan