Cases

146 P.3d 864 (2006) 2006 OK CIV APP 132 Leann HOPKINS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Amanda BYRD, Defendant/Appellant. No. 101,887. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. September 26, 2006. Holly Hefton Holly Hefton, P.C. Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellee. T.J. Shelton Lawson, King & Shelton, P.L.L.C. Oklahoma City,

Conley Byrd, Justice. Appellant, the City of DeWitt, on December 2, 1965, passed an ordinance requiring all utility companies doing business within the city to maintain a business office in the city. On December 18, appellee General Telephone Company of the Southwest filed its complaint with the Public Service Commission pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 73-208(d) (Repl. 1957), alleging that the ordinance was

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Earl Hayes (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against the County of Sullivan (“County”), the Sullivan County Sheriffs Department (“Sheriffs Department”) (collectively, “County Defendants”), and individual Defendants Detective Jason Gorr (“Detective Gorr” or “Gorr”), Detective Don Starner (“Detective Starner” or “Starner”), Deputy Patrolman Richa

665 S.E.2d 103 (2008) CITY OF ASHEVILLE, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, v. Wake County STATE of North Carolina, and County of Buncombe, et al., Defendants. No. COA07-516. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 19, 2008. *109 Robert W. Oast, Jr., City Attorney for the City of Asheville, and Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, by

N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,

By Judge Charles E. Poston Today the Court holds that its order of January 13, 1995, appointing a receiver for Virginia Beach Holding Corporation, should be vacated because it was procured by the fraud of the defendants Edwin B. Lindsley, Jr., and Nala Corporation and that the deed given by the receiver thereby appointed should be declared null and void. The Court also holds that none of the defendants owns or has any interest

547 S.W.2d 94 (1977) CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Arkansas, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. S & H, INC., a corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 76-82. Supreme Court of Arkansas, In Banc. February 28, 1977. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1977. James N. McCord, II, City Atty., Fayetteville, for appellant. Ball & Mourton by E. J. Ball, Fayett

372 F.2d 836 UNITED STATES of America and Linda Stout, by her father andnext friend, Blevin Stout, Appellants,v.JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF FAIRFIELD et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF BESSEMER et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Once again the Court is called upon to review school desegregation plans to determine whether the plans meet constitutional standards. The distinctive feature of these cases, consolidated on appeal, is that they also require us to reexamine school desgregation standards in the light of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Guidelines of the United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Educat

978 F.2d 1334 CATAWBA INDIAN TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, also known as theCatawba Nation of South America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Richard Riley, as Governor of theState of South Carolina; County of Lancaster, and itscounty council consisting of Francis L. Bell, as Chairman,Fred E. Plyler, Eldridge Emory, Robert L. Mobley, Barry L.Mobley, L. Eugene Hudson, Lindsay Pettus, City of Rock Hill,J. Emm

This suit was an eminent domain proceeding for the purpose of widening Church Street in the City of Nashville, in accordance with an ordinance of the city under the terms of its charter, which charter adopted the procedure outlined in Shannon's Code, sections 1981 to 1984. This condemnation proceeding resulted in the destruction of Mason's leasehold interest in three rooms in the second story of a building owned by the Luck heirs and used by him for a photograph gallery. The case was t

524 S.E.2d 587 (2000) Richard BROWN and Pauline Brown, individually, and Richard Brown in his capacity as the Guardian ad Litem for Tiffany C. Brown, Plaintiffs, v. Loressa G. LIFFORD, Roy Slade, and Henry Leon Watkins d/b/a "Town Clown Ice Cream," Defendants. No. COA99-99. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 18, 2000. Donaldson & Black, P.A., by Jeffrey

Bucci v. Burns, 2020 NCBC 50. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 16 CVS 15478 MARCY BUCCI; RICK BUCCI; EUGENE N. BUCCI; EUGENE M. BUCCI; DAVID LUBIN; KARL SCHULER; and LAUREL MANDERBACH, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v.

997 S.W.2d 140 (1998) Bob T. SOUDER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. October 26, 1998. *141 William H. West; Stokes & Bartholomew of Nashville, William H. Shackelford of Jackson, for App

Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA

158 S.W.3d 663 (2005) Silverio ZUNIGA and Refugia Zuniga, Appellants, v. NAVARRO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and Rashay A. Koster Chapa, Individually, Appellees. No. 13-01-00852-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. March 10, 2005. Rehearing Overruled April 7, 2005. *665 Randall P. Crane, Law Office

NUMBER 13-01-00852-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF T

MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case, ostensibly seeking damages for copyright infringement under federal law and misappropriation of trade secrets under state law, is in reality an effort to wage a state-based domestic relations battle in federal court. The decision to dismiss the case, given that the case should never have been pursued outside the domestic .litiga

237 Ga. 876 (1976) 230 S.E.2d 307 DORSEY v. THE STATE. 30983. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued April 13, 1976. Decided November 3, 1976. Rehearing Denied November 23, 1976. DeWitt R. Dent, for appellant. H. Reginald Thompson, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd,