⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “CAPERS v. FEDEX CORPORATION”

District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010-12-13 · Published · cited 8× · 758 F. Supp. 2d 638; 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 129; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134959; 2010 WL 5094230
758 F.Supp.2d 638 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Cases. Cause Nos. 3:05-MD-527 RM, MDL-1700. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. December 13, 2010. *653 OPINION and ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Distri
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005-08-10 · Published · cited 2× · 381 F. Supp. 2d 1380; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16584; 2005 WL 1959110
381 F.Supp.2d 1380 (2005) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION (NO. II) No. 1700. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. August 10, 2005. Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ,[*] ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005-04-20 · Published · cited 1× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 1381; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7100; 2005 WL 949154
366 F.Supp.2d 1381 (2005) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION No. 1679. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. April 20, 2005. Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel. ORDER DENYING T
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025-02-12 · Published · cited 11× · 128 F.4th 387
22-1481 (L) United States v. Kelly UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: March 18, 2024 Decided: February 12, 2025) Docket Nos. 22-1481 (L), 22-1982 (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 23-11114 Document: 71-1 Date Filed: 07/11/2025 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11114 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 198 Wash. App. 206
*211 Verellen, C.J. ¶1 Brandon Afoa was severely injured working for Evergreen Aviation Ground Logistics Enterprises Inc. (EAGLE), providing ground services at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), which is owned and operated by the Port of Seattle (Port). Afoa sued the Port, alleging it failed to
District Court, W.D. New York · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 24× · 236 F. Supp. 3d 735; 2017 WL 713660
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Those who are entrusted with details about an individual’s health care should guard against even the inadvertent disclosure of that confidential information. Those duties were allegedly breached in this case when hackers secured access to confidential health care information through a cyberattack. Noneth
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-07-27 · Published · cited 21× · 880 F. Supp. 2d 220; 2012 WL 3059377; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104486
*225MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE’S MOTION TO DISMISS STEARNS, District Judge. In March of 2009, the United States Department of the Treasury announced the details of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), a component of the optimistically styled “Making Home Affordable Program.” Under the provisions of HAMP, mortgage loan
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri