Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RODNEY CARSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1641 (RWR) ) WILLIAM SIM et al., ) ) Defendants. )

778 F.Supp.2d 85 (2011) Rodney CARSON, Plaintiff, v. William SIM et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1641 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 22, 2011. *89 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Connie Nora Bertram, Cooley, LLP, Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RODNEY CARSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1641 (RWR) ) WILLIAM SIM et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

61 F.Supp.2d 607 (1999) Joseph CARSON, v. MAERSK, LTD. Civil Action No. G-98-525. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. August 19, 1999. *608 Ronald L White, Brown Sims Wise & White, Houston, TX, for Ron White. Richard Lee Melancon, Melancon and Hogue, Friendswood, TX, for Joseph Carson.

HOOPER, Chief Justice (dissenting). I must respectfully dissent. The arbitration provision is not limited to “[a]ny dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to any benefits or coverage hereunder or the breach thereof .” The entire arbitration provision signed by Ethel Carson reads as follows: “PRE-DISPUTE BINDING ARBITRATION AGREEMENT

[Cite as State v. Carson, 2021-Ohio-209.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109592 v. : D’ERISE MARCEL CARSON, :

FARMER, Judge. Appellant, Roy L. Lackey, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12.02(6) T.R.C.P. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff is an inmate in a state penal institution as a result of having entered into a plea bargain involving a charge of sexual offense against the defendant’s daughter. The defendant is Pl

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Megan K. Cavanagh Brian K. Zahra

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION February 15, 2024 Plaintiff-Appellee,

Dissenting Opinion by Justice Burgess I agree that Carson has not waived his right of appeal under Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that the trial court erred in relying on the Rule 404(b) notices in the clerk’s file in deciding the sentence in this case. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s error was structural, con

BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge Section 8 of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 serves two statutory purposes: (1) "aiding low-income families in obtaining a decent place to live" and (2) "promoting economically mixed housing." 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(a). This case is not about what is good housing policy, however. This case is about the rule of law-whether an agency effectively may suspend a duly promulgated regulation without observing the proce

OPINION VAIDIK, Chief Judge. Case Summary In 2009 Eve Carson posted a video to YouTube.com criticizing the investigation of her sister-in-law’s murder that occurred about a quarter-century before in Boston. Stacy Palombo, known by a username at the time, commented on Eve’s video, and Eve filed a complaint against Stacy for defama

JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Our courts have consistently prohibited a defendant from simultaneously claiming self-defense and asserting a misidentification defense. We now disavow that approach. We hold that if some evidence supports a finding of self-defense, the prosecution must prove its absence, and the trial court must give a requested self-defense jury instruction, e

582 F.3d 827 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy A. CARSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-3625. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 6, 2009. Decided October 6, 2009. *829 Gayle Helart, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Pl

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-3625 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T RACY A. C ARSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:08-cr-022-01—La

741 A.2d 686 (1999) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Samuel CARSON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 1, 1997. Decided November 18, 1999. *691 Jack McMahon, Philadelphia, for S. Carson. Catherine Marshall, Lawrence J. Goode, Philadelphia, Robert A. Graci, Harrisburg, for Com. Before FLAH

187 F.Supp.2d 462 (2002) Gregory CARSON, et al., Plaintiffs v. GIANT FOOD, INC., et al., Defendants No. CIV.A. JFM-96-2882. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 20, 2002. *463 *464 *465 *466

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KOPF, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NECivR 72.3, all parties have filed objections (filings 93 & 96) from the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (filing 90), which recommends, among other things, that I deny Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel (filing 11) and grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (filing 70)

72 F.Supp.2d 725 (1999) Paula Givens CARSON, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. Civ.A.SA98CA0469EP. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. October 20, 1999. *726 Rebecca C. Lucas, Attorney at Law, Ft. Worth, TX, Bill D. Blanton, Law Offices of Wayne Wright, P.C., San Antonio

SIMS, Justice. Armstrong Carson was tried for the willful -murder of Noah Hollon. He was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for 15 years. Three grounds are assigned by him for reversal of the judgment: 1. The verdict is flagrantly against the evidence; 2. incompetent evidence was admitted over defendant’s objection; 3. competent evidence offered by defendant was ex