Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ January 09, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A18D0222. SABRINA MCCAULEY v. PRESIDING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR MAGISTRATE CASE NUMBER 17D19384 et al. Applicant Sabrina McCauley has filed a motion to withdraw this application for discretionary appeal. The motion is hereby GRANTED, and the application i

Wyrick, J.: ¶1 This Court has said before that "without some judgment or judicial decree that has changed the relationship between the parties so that defendant is judicially required to do something, i.e., some enforceable judgment, plaintiffs cannot be said to be the successful or prevailing parties entitled to an award of attorney fees."

Reif, J.: ¶1 This appeal arises from an expungement proceeding brought by J.M.L. (Petitioner) in the District Court of Tulsa County. Petitioner sought, inter alia , to expunge the record of a 1992 conviction in the Municipal Criminal Court of Record for the City of Tulsa. The City of Tulsa objected, despite agreeing that Petitioner was eligible to have this conviction expunged. The City maintained the proper forum for this

OSCN Found Document:RICHARDSON v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

KAUGER, J., ¶1 The only question presented is whether, under the facts of this cause, the bondsman is entitled to remittance of the posted bond pursuant to 59 O.S. Supp. 2014 § 1332. 1 We hold that he is. FACTS ¶2 The appellant, John Burks, (Burks/bondsman) is a bon

¶10 Wyrick, J., not participating.

Larry Joplin, Judge: ¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Michael Schauf, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Daniel Lee Boling, III (Plaintiff), seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendant/Appellee The GEO Group, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Lawton Correctional Facility (Defendant), in Plaintiff's action to recover for personal injuries sustained by Daniel Lee Boling, III, while he was incarcerated at th

WILLIAM R. LUCERO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE *860In May 2011, David Eugene Bath ("Respondent") was hired to represent a client in a personal injury matter. Respondent knew that his client had a medical lien for the treatment of her injuries. During the litigation, Respondent advanced his client over $19,000.00 for her living expenses. He eve

WILLIAM R. LUCERO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE William Kevin Goode ("Respondent") was convicted of twenty-eight felony counts of cruelty to animals, based on the pain and suffering he inflicted on twenty dogs and eight cats in his care. He never reported his conviction to disciplinary authorities and declined to participate in this proceeding. Respondent's misconduct warrants a suspension of two years. I.

Wyrick, J. ¶1 When describing an insurer’s subrogation claim, we say that the subrogated insurer “steps into the shoes of the plaintiff.” 1 Here, the original plaintiff, Tori Ukpaka, brought a timely lawsuit against the Defendant/Appellee, Nicholas Payne, for injuries arising out of an áutomobile

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION ¶ 1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court’s recent decision in Gibby v, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2017 OK 78, 404 P.3d 44 (2017), disposes of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides: “In any case in which it appears that a prior controllin

¶1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S. Ct. Rule 1.201. ¶2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recen

REIF, J.: ¶ 1 This case concerns a dispute between Green Meadow Realty Co. (Realtor) and Roger and Mary Gillock (Owners) over Realtor's right to a commission. The trial court and Court of Civil Appeals resolved this dispute in favor of Realtor on the basis of the summary judgment record presented by the parties. Both courts found Owners were bound by an addendum to the listing agreement

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION ¶ 1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court’s recent decision in Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2017 OK 78, 404 P.3d 44 (2017), disposes of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides: “In any case in which it appears that a prior controllin

WILLIAM R. LUCERO PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE *845In the course of two domestic relations cases, Leah Rae Bishop ("Respondent") abdicated her duties to her clients, the courts, and the legal profession. She failed to diligently represent her clients, ignored court orders, refused to timely return files and funds owed to her clients, knowingly

ROBERT D. BELL, JUDGE ¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Shirley L., Jones, Barbara Petty and Lawrence Merl Schmoe, brought this action against Defendants/Ap-pellees, Garyanna Stalick, Lila Browning and Debra Hazelett, to recover mineral interests and punitive damages. Plaintiffs alleged the theories of constructive trust, slander of title, fraud, deceit and consp

COLBERT, J. ¶ 1 This appeal determines the constitutionality of section 57 of the Administrative Worker’s Compensation Act (AWCA), found at title 85A of the Oklahoma Statutes. Following a review of the record on appeal, the transcripts of the proceedings below, and the briefs of the parties and amici, this Court holds the forfeiture provision found at section 57 of title 85A violates the adequa

Larry Joplin, Judge: ¶1 Plaintiff/Appellant Harold Koppitz (Plaintiff) seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Appellees Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., As Successor By Merger to Chesapeake *321Exploration, L.P. (Defendants) on Plaintiff's claims to damages for the

DEBORAH B. BARNES, PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 The Oldahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) seeks review of the trial court’s order granting the motion to expunge certain criminal records of Daniel Lee Shade, Jr. Based on our review, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND

Wyrick, J., concurring in the judgment: ¶ 1 I agree with the Court that Ms. Wiggins lacks the “previous adjudication of disability” necessary to qualify her as a “physi-caliy impaired person” under 85 O.S.2011 402(A)(4). As such, I also agree with the Court’s decision to vacate the award in this case because, without a “physically impaired person” before it, the Wo