Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A1294, A25A1361. CASTLEBERRY v. THE STATE (two cases). Following a jury trial, Demitra Castleberry was convicted of violating a family violence order on June 15, 2022. She filed a timely pro se motion for new trial, and the trial court subsequently appointed Bethany Lavigno to represent Castleberry, who is indigent. La

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ May 29, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A1294, A25A1361. CASTLEBERRY v. THE STATE (two cases). Following a jury trial, Demitra Castleberry was convicted of violating a family violence order on June 15, 2022. She filed a timely pro se motion for new trial, and the trial court subsequently appointe

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-1682 _____________________________ DARRELL LAMAR CASTLEBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge. August 13, 2024 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. OSTERHA

Affirmed.

Affirmed.

Denied.

Affirmed.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00599-CR Timothy Colt Castleberry, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 71051, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JEFFREY CASTLEBERRY, DOC# 475665, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 23, 2015 NO. 03-14-00599-CR Timothy Colt Castleberry, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00289-CR Nicholas CASTLEBERRY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

12 So.3d 227 (2009) CASTLEBERRY v. STATE. No. 2D08-1785. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 3, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DELMAR CASTLEBERRY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

15 So.3d 585 (2009) CASTLEBERRY v. STATE. No. 2D09-909. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 14, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

619 S.E.2d 747 (2005) 275 Ga. App. 37 CASTLEBERRY v. The STATE. No. A05A1532. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 9, 2005. *748 Graham McKinnon, IV, Fox, Chandler, Homans, Hicks & McKinnon, Gainesville, for Appellant. Jason Deal, District Attorney, James Branch, Norris S. Lewis, Jr., Assistant D

3 So.3d 1251 (2009) CASTLEBERRY v. STATE. No. 2D09-587. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 12, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Mand.denied.

OPINION JANE BLAND, Justice. The State issued an indictment charging Darren Ray Castleberry with four felony offenses, two involving sexual assault of a child under seventeen years of age and the other two involving sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. After the trial court denied Castleberry’s pretrial motion to suppress, he pleaded guilt

WHATLEY, Judge. Phillip Castleberry seeks review of the summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court erroneously denied Castleber-ry’s motion as untimely, we reverse and remand. Rule 3.850 requires that a motion for postconviction relief be filed within two years after the judgment and sentence become final. If a

100 S.W.3d 400 (2002) Steven Todd CASTLEBERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-02-00293-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 24, 2002. *402 Scott H. Pawgan, Attorney At Law, Huntsville, for Appellant. Scott W. Rosekrans, Crim. Dist. Atty., Phil Nichols, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Coldspring

Fletcher, Chief Justice, concurring specially. I would hold that a defendant is entitled to cross-examine his co-indictee about the co-indictee’s plea of guilty. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with Division 2 of the majority opinion. 1. The exclusion of testimony about a co-indictee’s guilty plea runs afoul of a defendant’s right of confrontation. This Court is